
Fifth District Election: Kendra Horn and backers advance mainstream themes, challenger Stephanie Bice wants incumbent to back paycheck protection effort
Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK
![]()
Oklahoma City – One year ago this month, in a story for The Oklahoman, reporter Ben Felder pointed to U.S. Rep. Kendra Horn’s efforts “to defend [the] suburban map” in her reelection campaign. This hinted at Horn’s strength in the urban core, while noting her efforts to garner broader support.
In August 2019, Amber Phillips, writing for The Washington Post, predicted the Fifth Congressional District race would almost certainly be one of the top 10 U.S. House races of 2020.
A lot of things have changed in the last year, but it’s safe to say both news stories were largely on-target. Horn easily prevailed in her June 30 primary race, while Republicans chose a two-term state legislator in hopes of returning the seat to the GOP column.
Last week, state Senator Stephanie Bice, R-Oklahoma City, called on incumbent Democratic Rep. Kendra Horn to join an effort in Congress to force Nancy Pelosi to bring legislation to the floor to immediately utilize $134 billion in Paycheck Protection Program funds that remain unused.
In a press release sent to The City Sentinel and other news organizations, Bice called on “Rep. Horn to put aside partisanship and put Oklahomans and Americans back to work. Nancy Pelosi has refused to allow a vote on any legislation that would give small businesses access to the loans that have helped keep our economy afloat, but Kendra Horn can help put an end to the political gamesmanship and she should.”
Bice’s campaign pointed to legislation from Congresswoman Jamie Herrera Beutler, R-Washington), that would compel the Speaker of the House “to bring legislation to the floor to extend the Paycheck Protection Program. Herrera Beutler’s procedure, known as a discharge petition, calls for a vote on legislation that would distribute funds intended for use as part of the Paycheck Protection Program, but that were not distributed by the August 8 program deadline.”
Bice said, “These forgivable loans helped keep thousands of Oklahomans employed, but some businesses continue to face challenges and others were not approved for loans by the deadline. Kendra Horn should put the American people ahead of her political alliance with Nancy Pelosi and join the effort to bring this legislation to the floor immediately.”
Bice has been active in the U.S. mail, text messaging and emailed communications, to be sure, but the incumbent is putting communications into the hands of likely and possible voters at least once a day, and often more frequently.
The Oklahoma Democratic Party has sent a few colorful email flyers since Bice won the Republican nod on August 25. One four-fold touted “hundreds of meetings and dozens of town halls” Rep. Horn has held since her 2018 election, asserting she is accessible to constituents. State Democrats also financed at least mailers aiming at households with Republican voters and featuring a city-area mayor asserting Horn has tackled ‘the debt and wasteful spending” in order to protect retiree programs.
Center Forward, in an independent expenditure, had a recent mailer looking back at the initial round of national tax-financed programs to assist businesses, saying Horn “fought to ensure small businesses had access to emergency PPP loans so their employees could stay on payroll.” Another mailer from the New Jersey group said Horn “stepped up with Republicans and Democrats alike” to back legislation helping businesses to pay employees. That mailer encouraged recipients to “thank Kendra Horn and ask her to keep fighting for the CARES Act.”
In recent weeks, a leading national liberal group known as End Citizens United has been sending mailers to call explicitly for support of the incumbent. End Citizens United wants seeks U.S. Supreme Court reversal of a decision that allowed the proliferation of independent expenditures in candidate races.
Apparently aiming to offset some of that activity, the Congressional Leadership Fund has declared, in a mailer, that “Two-Faced Kendra Horn needs to look at herself in the mirror” – saying Horn “is telling us one thing .. but her actions reflect a failed liberal agenda.”
The City Sentinel newspaper supported each woman in her respective party primary.
The runoff endorsement for the eventual Republican nominee asserted: “State Sen. Stephanie Bice, an experienced public servant with a solid conservative record, is the candidate best positioned to make the case for a change. Senator Bice is pro-life, a defender of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, an energetic campaigner and a proven candidate.”
The newspaper’s appeal to Republican readers was explicit, saying the key question Republicans should answer – concerning the two conservative women then competing – was “Can she win in November?”
In the Democratic primary, the newspaper reflected, “Since taking the oath, [Kendra Horn] has developed into a serious member of Congress. Her work with other members of the Oklahoma delegation (all Republicans) have been notable. She has a serious and substantive style and a record on which to stand before voters in November, to say: ‘I’d like another two years.’
“Republicans will have to work hard and smart if they want to deny her that second term. She voted to impeach President Trump, which endeared her to the Democratic base but infuriated many Republicans. To be scrupulously fair, she approached that serious vote with a professional demeanor and respect for those who disagreed. In this day and age, that is notable in and of itself.”
Each candidate has begun to inundate television with their messaging.
In early voting and on Election Day itself (November 3), voters in central Oklahoma will make the call.
UPDATE: CNN.com and other news organizations reported that after weeks of stalled negotiations, Speaker Pelosi and U.S. Treasurer Steven Mnuchin have begun new discussions overs a new stimulus package. Under consideration is a new round of PPP revenue.
Fifth District Election: Kendra Horn and backers advance mainstream themes, challenger Stephanie Bice wants incumbent to back paycheck protection effort Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK
0 Comments
Reflections from an Editor who supports Barrett Advocates for Jones and ponders House District 889/28/2020 ![]()
Oklahoma City – From an editor’s reflections and notes on recent events, some comments.
President Donald Trump’s selection of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the best decision of his often-troubled presidency.
She is a high-caliber nominee in the tradition of Antonin Scalia, and a person with life experiences which have forged both her character and her approach to legal interpretation.
If she falls short of confirmation, the result will stand as another searing indictment – documentation of the collapse of serious discourse in the U. S. Senate.
If she is confirmed – particularly if the process unites Republicans and draws Democratic support in the upper chamber of Congress – the path toward a better and more intelligent approach to serious issues of policy and procedure will be laid.
Trump has done a lot of erode civility and comity in public life. To be fair, he has operated within the context of the late Ted Kennedy’s dreadful speech shortly after the late, great Robert Bork’s nomination (by the late, great Ronald Reagan) in 1987 and everything since.
The Bork battle remains the most significant domestic policy confrontation of my lifetime. The Barrett nomination is a close second.
*
After a difficult summer, the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board is crafting what the new legal counsel says will be a reduced work load.
It is both my prayer and my reasoned hope that the work of the P&P Board in the years ahead will lead to commutations or releases for imprisoned persons who are actually innocent or who have served serious time for their underlying offenses.
As I have written previously, the death penalty is constitutional and, in fact, explicitly contemplated in the text of the U.S. Constitution.
However, the practice of executions for capital crimes across the United States is so laced with systemic problems that its use in contemporary circumstances is ill-advised. Even one unjust execution is an indictment of the American system in practice, if not in theory. The significant number of exonerations and subsequent releases from incarceration (including from state death rows) should lead to a careful and methodical retreat from executions, as a prelude to a permanent moratorium.
The Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission’s 2017 report on the actual use of the death penalty documented issues so grave and substantive that a former Oklahoma governor commented there is no doubt some innocent persons have been executed.
For several years, I have highlighted the murder conviction of Julius Jones of Edmond. The police investigation of his case was flawed from the git-go. His original legal counsel was (by the lawyer’s admission) ineffectual. His family provided a believable alibi. The local prosecutor promised to allow Jones’ capable federal attorneys to examine undisclosed investigatory files – and then reneged on that commitment.
Finality of judgment is a laudable goal. In law and in procedure, there are no compelling reasons to retain the presumption of finality in the face of strong evidence of innocence.
The sentence of Julius Jones should be commuted to time served. The governor should consider the case for exoneration. Oklahoma should shift away from the use of capital punishment. The P&P Board should help lead the way.
It is time to end our state’s use of the deeply flawed and dysfunctional Ultimate Sanction.
*
In 2014, The City Sentinel newspaper endorsed Paula Sophia for state representative in House District 88. Sophia, who no longer lives here, served in Desert Storm, and is a respected retiree from the Oklahoma City Police department.
The challenging course of Paula’s life had, at the time of the endorsement, been covered in this newspaper and other publications. A crowded field of four candidates sought the job that year. Sophia finished second in the runoff.
In a year where representation was determined in the Democratic runoff, Sophia was narrowly defeated (in a low-turnout election) by Jason Dunnington. Dunnington established a clearly liberal record in the Oklahoma Legislature, as a serious advocate for liberal policies who was often able and willing to work with the majority party.
In this year’s primary, The City Sentinel endorsed Dunnington. Dunnington’s defeat was a loss for the district, our city, and the state.
He lost the nomination to Mauree Turner, a self-described Progressive and a community organizer with no experience in public office.
For the first time since 2012, Republicans have a candidate. Unlike Turner, Kelly Barlean has meaningful experience in elective office – including service as vice-chairman of the Appropriations Committee in the Washington state Legislature.
Stay tuned.
NOTE: This reflection is edited and expanded from an “Editor’s Notebook” in the October 2020 print edition of The City Sentinel newspaper, and adapted slightly from the version previously posted at City-Sentinel.com . The founder of CapitolBeatOK.com, an online news service, and publisher of The City Sentinel newspaper in Oklahoma City, Patrick B. McGuigan is the author (with Dawn M. Weyrich) of ‘Ninth Justice: The Fight for Bork,’ and editor of ‘Crime and Punishment in Modern America’.
Reflections from an Editor who supports Barrett, Advocates for Jones, and ponders House District 88 Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]()
By Greg Forster, Ph.D. Yale University
Theme: Universal choice is the principled — and pragmatic — education policy. Every Oklahoma family that wants choice should have it — now.
The school choice movement is at a crossroads. Decades of success have positioned the movement to aim higher—for the still-unrealized dream of universal school choice. And a few high-profile challenges have also made it clear that the movement will not be secure until it makes a firm commitment to universal choice. As the pandemic forces states to rethink education policy in the coming years, now is the time to put universal choice at the forefront.
School choice programs allow families to use public funds devoted to their student to attend the school of their choice, public or private. That puts parents in charge of education, as they should be. The best-designed programs, which are known as Education Savings Accounts, give the funds to families in the form of a dedicated account that can be spent on any educational expenses — not just tuition, but also supplemental services.
However, existing choice programs are limited. Sometimes they’re limited to serving specific student populations, like low-income students — or, what amounts to much the same thing, students assigned to low-performing schools in the government school monopoly. Sometimes they’re just limited in total size. Sometimes they’re limited in what private-school parents are allowed to choose — for example, parents can only choose schools that maintain specific kinds of admission policies. Imposing a lot of unnecessary process requirements on schools, which rarely contribute to actual transparency, is another way of limiting school access.
Universal choice would mean getting rid of all those limits. It would mean every family with a pre-K–12 student that wants choice can have it — no arbitrary restrictions based on demographics or program size or anything else. And any private school that meets ordinary health and safety requirements should be eligible. If a school satisfies the attendance laws, it should be an available choice.
It’s important to come back to first principles on a regular basis. Life is always tearing us away from our most important commitments. There is never a lack of short-term opportunities to bag a quick gain for the cause, if only we’re willing to settle for “the cause” being something less than its full, real self.
It isn’t even always wrong to make reasonable compromises. But it’s imperative not to lose your way as you do so. You can get a short-term gain by compromising, yes — but what counts as a “gain”? What is your purpose, the goal toward which you are seeking gains? It’s nefariously easy to get so busy compromising away the big vision that we lose track of what we’re supposed to be gaining.
Hence the importance of a regular return to first principles. The choice movement has gained a great deal. A supermajority of U.S. states — 30 of them — have school choice programs, plus two territories as well (the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico). Eighteen states, including Oklahoma, have two or more programs! As a result, over half a million students attend private schools using public funds. That’s a long way from the tiny voucher program in Milwaukee that launched the modern school choice movement in 1990.
The question is, what is the choice movement going to do with that success? Keep racking up programs that are limited in the number of students they can serve, and in the schools those students are allowed to choose? Or think about what it would mean to take things to the next level? There are almost 51 million K-12 students in public schools; while I have no doubt that a lot of them are in the right place, and wouldn’t exercise choice if they had it, it seems like the time has come to aim higher.
There are two reasons to aim higher. Pragmatically, it’s politically expedient to move toward universal school choice. And on principle, universal choice is the right thing to do.
One of the great ironies of life is that the least pragmatic thing to be is a pure pragmatist. “Forget about high ideals and just do what works” may get you by in the short run. In the long run, however, the only thing that actually “works” is high ideals. Without them, cynicism and distrust erode social cooperation, and there is no basis on which to settle disputes about what is permitted.
We see that principle illustrated in the history of the modern choice movement. The more we’ve compromised the ideal of universal choice, the more headaches we’ve ended up with. Bigger and broader programs are more stable and thrive better.
Earlier programs, like Milwaukee’s, were created with especially strict limits. That was a concession to the political reality at the time, and it was probably necessary. But it also saddled those programs with permanent political weaknesses. Because few people could benefit from these programs, few were invested in defending them. Meanwhile, programs created later, when the movement was stronger, have fewer limitations and are thus able to mobilize a larger power base to defend the program politically.
Some of the early programs, like Milwaukee’s, have survived in spite of their limitations. You know how they’ve done that? By keeping the larger goal of universal choice in view, and gradually working to remove the limitations and/or create new programs to serve those who aren’t served by the older ones! By broadening access to choice, they broaden the choice coalition.
This, by the way, is the answer to the old saw about how school choice will inevitably lead to government meddling in private-school curricula. Most choice programs are now over a decade old, yet none of them has produced even the first stages of the kind of meddling critics darkly warn against. You know why? Thousands of people march on state capitals when the programs are under threat.
Think about how hard it is to introduce even small reforms to Social Security or Medicare. These programs are universal, which makes them politically self-supporting. By contrast, while reforming, say, welfare programs is not always a cake walk, it’s something you can do. Most voters don’t feel that their own interests are at stake in the program.
Universal choice is expedient in another way as well. It makes the programs work better. Choice improves education by taking coercion out of the educational relationship, allowing parents and schools to match up and collaborate in a genuinely voluntary way. So the less choice is available, the less effectively the programs improve education—and that affects their political fortunes.
One of the high-profile challenges that points the movement toward universal choice is the debacle in Louisiana. It’s the only choice program that actually harmed educational outcomes. The state imposed so many arbitrary controls on the program, schools that actually wanted to spend their time educating students chose not to participate in it. While the nation’s other choice programs have performed well, that one bad apple put a good deal of egg on the movement’s collective face.
But universal choice isn’t just politically expedient. It’s right. Limited choice comes from an assumption of paternalism and control — comfortable elites who think ordinary parents, and especially poor and minority parents, can’t be trusted with the education of their own children. That’s better than the more extreme paternalism of the government school monopoly, but not enough better. A firm commitment to the American ideals of equality and freedom points directly to universal school choice.
Here, too, a high-profile challenge to the movement points toward the desirability of universal choice. In the 1990s and 2000s, there was a coherent “education reform movement” that simultaneously embraced accountability reforms for public schools and the expansion of private school choice. But the people in the movement who prioritized accountability became more and more extremely paternalistic and controlling in the 2010s. This culminated in the federal Common Core debacle and other developments that drove a wedge between “accountability” reformers, obsessed with endless standardized testing to the exclusion of well-rounded education, and “choice” reformers whose ultimate goal is to put parents in charge.
For decades, choice advocates toned down their commitment to full equality and freedom in education, in order to make nice with the technocratic testers. Now that the technocrats have gone their own way, not by our choice but by theirs, and have dramatically crashed and burned, why not embrace our principles and stand on them? Let the past suffice for finding “middle ways” between systems that control people and systems that liberate them.
The pandemic will force all 50 states to reevaluate education policy in the coming years. Even now, we are starting to see the first shifts from the necessarily frantic “emergency mode” to a more long-term rethinking of policy for the new reality.
What will the school choice movement have to say in this important moment? It should unapologetically embrace universal choice as the pragmatic and principled education policy, not just for families struggling to find school solutions during a pandemic, but for all times.
NOTE: This commentary first appeared at the website of The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs (OCPA) https://ift.tt/3j5RSvd, and is reposted here with permission. Greg Forster (Ph.D., Yale University) is a Friedman Fellow with EdChoice. He has conducted numerous empirical studies on education issues, including school choice, accountability testing, graduation rates, student demographics, and special education. The author of nine books and the co-editor of six books, Dr. Forster has also written numerous articles in peer-reviewed academic journals, as well as in popular publications such as The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and the Chronicle of Higher Education. His latest book is ‘Economics: A Student’s Guide’ (Crossway, 2019).
Aiming for Universal School Choice: A Commentary Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]() A resurrection in “Skyfall” – James Bond, better than ever Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]()
Oklahoma City – Sen. Paul Rosino, Senate chair of the Legislative Veterans Caucus, said an independent investigation into social media posts alleging abuse and neglect at the Lawton Veterans Center – completed by the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (OKDHS) Advocate General -- showed no substantiated findings.
“I felt it was critical for the veterans center and the Department of Veterans Affairs that the investigation be independently conducted. I requested the investigation be conducted by the Oklahoma Department of Human Services Advocate General,” said Rosino, R-Oklahoma City. “The safety and wellbeing of our veterans is my top priority.”
In his statement -- released early this month soon after the report was submitted -- Rosino also stated that while long-term care facilities as a whole have been stressed with workforce issues prior to COVID-19, those issues have been exacerbated by the pandemic.
The Oklahoman comments
An editorial in The Oklahoman this month noted investigators did not substantiate the assertions of poor care of veterans living in the centers, lack of hygiene and other issues.
However, the editorial staff at the state’s largest newspaper expressed concern that the full report was not made public. (https://ift.tt/33Qzm3u)
“Families are missing quality interactions that are vital to the mental and physical health of seniors in these facilities,” Rosino commented in a press release sent to CapitolBeatOK.com and other news organizations. “I am grateful to the Advocate General and his team for digging into these allegations thoroughly and in a timely manner to give us a clear picture regarding the operations of the Lawton center.”
State Officials comment
“This was a large-scale investigation into numerous allegations,” said Joe Dewey, Advocate General at OKDHS. “I am proud of the quality of work our team undertook in a few short weeks and that we were able to provide a final report for the families and residents of the Lawton Veterans Center.”
“Sen. Rosino is a strong advocate for veterans who cares about their health and welfare, especially those in Oklahoma’s veterans’ centers,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Greg Treat. “I appreciate his innovative leadership in getting state agencies to work together to facilitate an independent review of these serious complaints.”
“Because our highest priority at ODVA is caring for Oklahoma veterans, when allegations surfaced on social media or local media, we determined that a comprehensive, external investigation should be conducted,” said Joel Kintsel, Executive Director, Oklahoma Department of Veterans Affairs. “We are so grateful that the Department of Human Services answered the call and conducted this very thorough and important, external investigation.”
Genesis of Independent Investigation
An investigation of the facility was ordered by the V.A. director after reporter Nolan Clay’s story chronicling the complaints of some families, asserted care, hygiene, and other problems at the center had grown during the months-long stretch when family members of residents have not been able to visit the facility.
(https://ift.tt/3mDW7QX)
When the issue emerged in August, several legislators supported the state V.A. for “taking action to investigate and remedy the situation.”
Joining in a statement this summer were Sen. John Michael Montgomery, R-Lawton; Sen. Chris Kidd, R-Waurika; Rep. Trey Caldwell, R-Lawton; Rep. Toni Hasenbeck, R-Elgin; Rep. Daniel Pae, R-Lawton; and Rep. Rande Worthen, R-Lawton,
The legislators encouraged an executive order “relating to long-term care visitation to consider solutions to enable families to safely check upon the treatment of their loved ones in state facilities and other elder care facilities.”
At most state-run V.A. facilities, visitation remains on hold due to the ongoing pandemic.
The state government is preparing protocols to reopen centers for visitors. The Oklahoma Department of Veteran Affairs runs the centers in Ardmore, Claremore, Clinton, Lawton, Norman, Sallisaw, Sulphur and Talilhina.
Note: Publisher Pat McGuigan contributed to this report.
Veteran’s Caucus Chair, Pro Tempore comment on independent investigation of Lawton Veterans Center, which did not substantiate allegations of abuse and neglect Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]()
NOTE: This essay is adapted from a post that appeared the evening of Constitution Day (September 17) on the facebook pages for CapitolBeatOK and The City Sentinel newspaper.
Oklahoma City – Should one or another of the Facebook pages with which I am affiliated go “missing in action,” I have no intention of changing my approach to my chosen profession -- journalism as the first draft of history. Same with the ‘twittersphere,’ where many frequent readers reside.
Check out the websites CapitolBeatOK.com and City-Sentinel.com if we are not in other, more familiar places, in the days ahead. In Oklahoma City, the newspaper of which I am publisher (The City Sentinel) is available around the city in a wide range of racks and available for purchase at a few convenience stores or book sellers.
My first journalism writing award, for sports news, came when I was in high school at Bishop McGuinness in Oklahoma City. I wrote for The O’Collegian during my college years in Stillwater, and had essays printed in every corner of the United States and in foreign newspapers during my tenure in Washington, D.C. 1980-1990. That pattern continued during my twelve years at The Oklahoman, 1990-2002.
In the last 18 years, while devoting much of my professional time to teaching and during a brief stint in state government, I continued to write for a variety of publications, including Tulsa Today, Watchdog.org, The City Sentinel newspaper and CapitolBeatOK.com. I am grateful to Sooner Politics, which regularly posts CapitolBeatOK’s stories and other reports.
A perhaps allegorical or even legendary story is that the Mandarin symbol for “crisis” is also the symbol for “opportunity.”
And Oscar Wilde allegedly proclaimed there was an ancient Chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times.”
Crisis. Opportunity. Interesting Times.
Sounds like we’re there, regardless of who gets credit for the sequence of events or the original source of the wisdom.
Reliable readers and certain friends: I won’t go away, and I hope you don’t either.
Believing in the pursuit of excellence, as did the Olympic sprinter Harold Abrahams, I remain –
Your humble servant,
– Patrick B. McGuigan
Heads Up: If my posts go ‘missing in action” during these interesting times Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]() Parental demand may change school choice landscape Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK Census Sprint to the Finish event to boost Census response set for Friday at State Capitol9/16/2020 ![]()
OKLAHOMA CITY – With the approaching end of the US Census just two weeks away, the Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy (OICA) and the state Department of Commerce’s “OK, Let’s Count!” initiative are partnering to boost Census response among state and nonprofit employees.
Joining them in the effort are the Oklahoma Press Association, Oklahoma Municipal League, Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits, and other members of the “OK, Let’s Count!” coalition.
Together, the organizations will sponsor the nonprofits’ “Census Sprint to the Finish” event scheduled for Friday, September 18, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the south parking lot of the Oklahoma State Capitol.
Officials from the U.S. Census Bureau and Oklahoma state officials will be in attendance, along with “Rumble,” mascot of the Oklahoma City Thunder NBA team.
Less than 60 percent of Oklahoma households had completed their Census forms through a few days.
According to the press release, a low response puts at risk hundreds of millions of federal tax dollars Oklahomans will have paid to Washington. An inadequate count will send Oklahomans’ tax dollars to more populous states, including Texas.
“The purpose of the event to encourage every state employee and nonprofit employee, volunteer, or service recipient to respond to the U.S. Census,” said Joe Dorman, Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy Chief Executive Officer. “It is critical we do this now as the Census Bureau has been directed to stop counting on Sept. 30. Our time is simply running out.”
Services that will improve the lives of Oklahoma’s children are among those that will lose essential funding with an incomplete Census count, according to Dorman.
“The event at the Capitol will be a great place to respond, consistent with social distancing and COVID-19 precautions,” he added. “People will be able to drive up and respond on a sanitized computer pad and have their Census data count immediately.”
There will be hot dogs and drinks available, and a raffle for one lucky winner who responds to the Census at the Capitol on that day.
There is no cost except to commit to promoting the Census and encouraging others to respond to the Census before Sept. 30.
To sign up for the Friday event, organizations and agencies can click here: https://ift.tt/3c3izhr .
Nonprofit organizations and state agencies – like the Oklahoma Educational Television Authority (OETA), which registered for the event, are encouraged to sign up – reflecting their commitments to a full count for Oklahoma in the Census.
As part of its commitment, OETA TV has aired thousands of dollars’ worth of promotions in support of Census response.
“This is our one crack at setting our population for a decade,” Dorman said. “If we fail to count every Oklahoman, we will throw away almost three-quarters-of-a-billion dollars – money we as Oklahomans worked hard to earn.”
The amount comes from the fact that for every person not counted, the state loses approximately $1,700 each year.
If the Census misses one-out-of-every hundred Oklahomans, that will add up to $72 million per year – or $720 million over the 10 years between Census counts, Dorman notes.
“The Friday event is a tremendous opportunity to ensure those who serve are counted,” Dorman said. “We want to ensure every Oklahoman is counted. That way, we do not lose vital resources and allow other states which did better in Census response to get Oklahomans’ tax dollars.”
The Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy was established in 1983 by citizens seeking to create a strong advocacy network that would provide a voice for the needs of children and youth in Oklahoma, particularly those in the state’s care and those growing up amid poverty, violence, abuse and neglect, disparities, or other situations that put their lives and future at risk.
OICA’s mission statement reads: “Creating awareness, taking action and changing policy to improve the health, safety, and well-being of Oklahoma’s children.”
For more information, visit oica.org.
NOTE: The City Sentinel newspaper is a member of the Oklahoma Press Association (OPA), a sponsor of Friday’s event at the State Capitol.
www.City-Sentinel.com
‘Census Sprint to the Finish’ event to boost Census response set for Friday at State Capitol Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]()
Redistricting is done every ten years. It involves redrawing Congressional district lines to insure all 435 representatives have approximately the same amount of constituents. Federal redistricting is done by the state Legislature. Members of the House and Senate also draw their own legislative district lines.
There are 101 state house districts and 48 state senate districts in Oklahoma. Redistricting is always a controversial process.
Earlier this year, a group called "People Not Politicians" filed an initiative petition to get redistricting on the November ballot. They proposed having a group of appointees oversee the redistricting process to cut out gerrymandering. Seven ‘blue’ states have it in their constitution.
Before the Oklahoma group started gaining signatures, the language of the petition was challenged. The state Supreme Court struck down the petition. The group changed the language but ultimately pulled the petition in July.
“Between the unnecessary lawsuits by politicians and delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are unable to make the ballot this year, and have thus withdrawn S.Q. 810," People Not Politicians Executive Director Andy Moore said.
Three observations about redistricting:
First, elections have consequences. The Party in power gets to wield that power and that includes drawing lines in redistricting. That is the way it has always been and the way it should be.
Elected officials are accountable to voters – appointees to their appointer. The Democrats controlled Oklahoma government for almost a century. There was no complaint about redistricting being unfair during those years.
What changed? Clearly it was when Republicans gained control of state government. The redistricting process is not broken in Oklahoma. It does not need to be changed.
Second, redistricting is a national Democrat priority. Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is Chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC). Their stated purpose is to ‘execute a comprehensive redistricting strategy that shifts the redistricting power in a way that it creates fair districts where Democrats can compete.’
Fair meaning drawn where Democrats win, not just compete. NDRC has targeted 13 states with the objective of flipping the state legislature to Democrat so they control redistricting.
Two of those states -- Texas and Kansas – border Oklahoma. This organization cares little about fairness -- they want to win elections. It is partisanship packaged as impartiality.
Third, Republicans had their own redistricting initiative. Ten years ago, the GOP flipped 20 state legislative chambers nationally, seizing control of district map making in many states after the decennial census. Oklahoma had flipped in 2008. The emphasis on redistricting cemented Republican dominance at the state and congressional levels for most of the last decade.
To not take the Democrat strategy seriously is a mistake, because it worked for the GOP.
Redistricting can be a difficult task, even for the Party in power. Districts have to be contiguous – which means ‘touching.’ They have to have a certain number of people. Incumbents are involved and seldom are two incumbents drawn into a district. Both the state senate and house appoint committees to put together a proposal for redistricting to present to the whole chamber.
Communities lobby to keep a lawmaker who has been an effective voice for their cause. The word ‘gerrymandering’ is continually heard from the Party not in power.
Not everyone will be pleased with redistricting, but under Oklahoma’s current system, voters can hold those who draw the lines accountable.
Steve Fair is Chairman of the Republican Party in Oklahoma’s Fourth Congressional District. His commentaries appear often on the CapitolBeatOK.com website. He can be reached by email at [email protected]. His blog is stevefair.blogspot.com.
Democrats focus on redistricting: A Commentary Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK ![]()
Gross Receipts to the Treasury slipped by almost five percent in August with oil and gas production taxes the primary driver, Oklahoma state Treasurer Randy McDaniel announced on Friday (September 4).
August receipts from all sources total $979.5 million and are below collections from August 2019 by $47.3 million, or 4.6 percent. It marks the fifth time since February, the start of the national recession, that total receipts have been less than those of the prior year.
Collections from the gross production tax, the state’s severance tax on oil and natural gas, fell by 46.3 percent, generating $40.7 million, or $35.1 million less than a year ago.
Monthly gross production receipts have been less than the same month of the prior year for 12 consecutive months.
“The gross receipts report provides evidence of the challenges facing Oklahoma’s anchor industry,” Treasurer McDaniel said. “Oil and gas tax receipts have dropped by more than $430 million during the past year. We will likely see a growing ripple effect into other sectors of the economy.”
August oil and gas receipts reflect production activity during June, when West Texas Intermediate crude oil averaged $38.11 per barrel. Prices rose to $42.34 in August, but drilling activity and energy-related employment have continued to drop. July reports show 34,100 oil field employees in Oklahoma, down by 14,400 over the year. Rigs counts were set at 11 in August, a sharp reduction from 80 rigs last August.
In addition to gross production collections, receipts from sales tax and motor vehicle taxes were below those of August 2019 by 4.4 percent and 8.2 percent respectively. Gross income tax receipts rose by 4.8 percent and use taxes paid on out-of-state purchases increased by 2 percent in August compared to the prior year.
Cumulative gross receipts from the past 12 months total $13.27 billion, down by $455.8 million, or 3.3 percent, from the trailing 12-month period. All major revenue sources except for corporate income tax and use tax are less than those of the previous 12 months.
Other economic indicators
The Oklahoma Business Conditions Index in August remained above growth neutral for a third month, following three months of numbers indicating economic contraction. The August index was set at 61.8, down from 69 in July. Numbers above 50 indicate economic expansion is expected during the next three to six months.
The unemployment rate in Oklahoma was reported as 7.1 percent in July, up from 6.4 percent in June. The seasonally adjusted number of Oklahomans listed as jobless was reported as 128,087, according to figures released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The U.S. unemployment rate was listed at 10.2 percent in July.
August collections
Compared to gross receipts from August 2019, collections in August 2020 showed:
• Total August 2020 gross collections are $979.5 million, down $47.3 million, or 4.6 percent.
• Gross income tax collections, a combination of individual and corporate income taxes, generated $278.8 million, an increase of $12.9 million, or 4.8 percent.
• Individual income tax collections are $261.1 million, up by $2 million, or 0.8 percent.
• Corporate collections are $17.7 million, an increase of $10.9 million, or 160.7 percent.
• Combined sales and use tax collections, including remittances on behalf of cities and counties, total $466.4 million – a reduction of $17.2 million, or 3.6 percent.
• Sales tax collections total $401 million, a decrease of $18.5 million, or 4.4 percent.
• Use tax receipts, collected on out-of-state purchases including online sales, generated $65.4 million, an increase of $1.3 million, or 2 percent.
• Gross production taxes on oil and natural gas total $40.7 million, a decrease of $35.1 million, or 46.3 percent.
• Motor vehicle taxes produced $64.2 million, down by $5.7 million, or 8.2 percent.
• Other collections composed of some 60 different sources including taxes on fuel, tobacco, medical marijuana, and alcoholic beverages, produced $129.3 million – down by $2.2 million, or 1.7 percent.
Twelve-month collections
Combined gross receipts for the past 12 months (September 2019 through August 2020) compared to the prior 12 months showed:
• Gross revenue totals $13.27 billion. That is $455.8 million, or 3.3 percent, below collections from the previous 12-month period.
• Gross income taxes generated $4.75 billion, reflecting an increase of $119.7 million, or 2.6 percent.
• Individual income tax collections total $4.1 billion, down by $16.1 million, or 0.4 percent.
• Corporate collections are $651.9 million, an increase of $135.8 million, or 26.3 percent.
• Combined sales and use taxes generated $5.47 billion, a drop of $139.2 million, or 2.5 percent.
• Gross sales tax receipts total $4.71 billion, down by $182.7 million, or 3.7 percent.
• Use tax collections generated $752 million, an increase of $43.5 million, or 6.1 percent.
• Oil and gas gross production tax collections generated $736.3 million, down by $432.8 million, or 37 percent.
• Motor vehicle collections total $777.9 million. This is a decrease of $10.5 million, or 1.3 percent.
• Other sources generated $1.54 billion, up by $7 million, or 0.5 percent.
About Gross Receipts to the Treasury: The monthly Gross Receipts to the Treasury report, developed by the state treasurer’s office, provides a timely and broad view of the state’s economy.
It is released in conjunction with the General Revenue Fund report from the Office of Management and Enterprise Services, which provides information to state agencies for budgetary planning purposes.
The General Revenue Fund, the state’s main operating account, receives less than half of the state’s gross receipts with the remainder paid in rebates and refunds, remitted to cities and counties, and apportioned to other state funds.
Energy Sector Pullback pushes Oklahoma gross receipts lower, Treasurer reports Click on the headline to read the full article at CapitolBeatOK |
Pat McGuiganThe dean of all Oklahoma Journalism, Mr Patrick McGuigan; has a rich history of service in many aspects of both covering the news and producing the information that the public needs to know. Archives
September 2021
Categories |