Sooner Politics.org
  • Front Page
  • Oklahoma News
  • Editorial
    • Satire >
      • Dubiosity
      • Steeple Chasers
  • Sooner Issues
  • State Groups
  • Sooner Analysts
  • Election 2018
  • Lawmaker's Journal
  • Nation
    • National Commentary >
      • The Media
  • magazine
  • World
  • Cut The Crap
  • Facebook

Judge Or Judge Not? The Retention Endorsements

10/15/2016

Comments

 
Picture
  Seven judges are seeking another term on our statewide oversight courts. A couple of them are worth keeping. Far more are needing to go. Perhaps the finest judge is retiring.
  Steven Taylor has shown a strong and independent library of case opinions. He has sometimes dissented alone. Even then he has boldly declared his clear intellect and respect for the state's constitutional language.
  The editorial review being published here, is a work subject to further consideration. Comments are especially welcome. But we have gathered enough data to begin the discussion and tip our hand as to which judges we do and do not support for a whole new term.
​
Oklahoma Supreme Court:
  As we mentioned above, Steven Taylor is retiring and we call upon the appointed committees to find a set of candidates worthy to sit in his seat.
  We did not use the Ten Commandments ruling in this review. It is our opinion that the constitution is clearly flawed in the so-called "Blaine Amendment" section. The justices were duty-bound to maintain a strict-constructionist ruling on this case. The correct remedy is to change the constitution (which we are doing with state question 790). A failure to pass this reform could result in the Oklahoma National Guard to go without chaplain care during deployment in war.


​For Retention
: None


Against Retention: Winchester & Combs
  James Winchester has consistently disappointing the legislature and been a foot dragging the process of reforming Oklahoma law. His continued selective use of the "One subject" argument is unacceptable. Winchester also ignored the plain language of the constitution 2 years ago when he voted to allow a legislator to run for District Attorney, even though the language of the constitution barred him from being elected until after his legislative term had expired. (Justice Taylor scolded the majority for this ruling)
  Douglas Combs is a clear case of 'lame duck' abuse of power.  Three days after Republican, Ma Fallin defeated Jeri Askin to succeed Brad Henry as Oklahoma Governor; Henry decided his fellow Shawnee Democrat should get this last-minute appointment. Henry has stacked the high court more successfully than any other governor since 1908. Five of the 9 justices are Brad Henry's appointees. If Combs wants to continues serving he should be removed by the voters and then seek a new appointment untainted by lame duck shenanigans.

Judge Retain? Dist. Appt. Gov. Law School Birthplace
Chief Justice John Reif   1st 2007 Brad Henry University of Tulsa Skiatook, Oklahoma
Steven Taylor (retiring) 2nd 2004 Brad Henry University of Oklahoma Henryetta, Oklahoma
Noma Gurich   3rd 2011 Brad Henry University of Oklahoma South Bend, Indiana
Yvonne Kauger   4th 1984 George Nigh Oklahoma City University Colony, Oklahoma
James Winchester NO 5th 2000 Frank Keating Oklahoma City University Clinton, Oklahoma
Tom Colbert   6th 2004 Brad Henry University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
James Edmondson   7th 2003 Brad Henry Georgetown University Kansas City, Missouri
Vice-Chief Douglas L. Combs NO 8th 2010 Brad Henry Oklahoma City University Shawnee, Oklahoma
Joseph Watt   9th 1992 David Walters University of Texas Austin, Texas
PictureAl Gerhart, Overcame a blackmail conviction.
Court of Criminal Appeals
For Retention: Hudson
When it comes to constitutional freedoms and civic participation, Robert Hudson became a hero of the grassroots activist. Activist, Al Gerhart, has been a blunt and aggressive voice in state government. He is the leader of the Sooner Tea Party. When Senator Branan used his dictatorial powers (granted by the corrupting senate rules), Gerhart sought all legal persuasions to get the popular bill a hearing and vote.
The majority of the Appeal Court agreed the blackmail charge was improperly applied to Gerhart with Judge Lumpkin writing that "Gerhart’s email did not urge or compel the senator to violate the law or commit an unlawful act."
  Since the email was sent as a political ploy, the majority of judges could not validate the state’s claim that Branan was coerced to do anything against his will.

  “The record indicates that Appellant was somewhat of an irritant to Oklahoma lawmakers. However, the Constitution protects the rights of the political irritant to contact his elected representative and voice his concerns as much as it protects any citizen’s right to do so,”  expressed Hudson and his majority members
  “Further, the circumstances surrounding the communication indicate the email was sent with the intent to persuade the senator to change his mind about a proposed piece of legislation for which he had not previously voiced support. This is pure political advocacy available to every citizen,” the majority opinion states. “..vehement, caustic and unpleasantly sharp political speech is protected by the First Amendment.”
  “This case presents an issue that goes to the foundation of our Republic, i.e., individual freedom and the protection of the individual’s freedom of expression. The political process places those who seek to serve as legislators in the crosshairs of the divergent views of the public they seek to serve. To preserve the Republic we must continually preserve the right of the citizen to dissent and their desires,” 

The majority also wrote that "a communication is a felony under the state’s blackmail statute based on what the speaker threatens to do".

“Here, Appellant did not threaten to do any act prohibited by the statute. The blackmail charge in this case was premature,”
the judge wrote.

Judges David Lewis and Robert Hudson concurred with Lumpkin. Judges Clancy Smith and Arlene Johnson dissented.

Against Retention: Smith
Clancy Smith completely disregarded clear consttutional rights to redress of grievance and free political speech. No illegal or tort cause was committed by Gerhart; yet Smith said;
“Gerhart may or may not have been an irritant to Oklahoma lawmakers. However, in this communication he explicitly threatened one lawmaker, promising to investigate him and his family and expose him to ridicule, if the lawmaker did not ensure a bill was heard and passed. This conduct crosses the line from ‘irritant’ to criminal conduct,” Smith wrote
Judge Retain? District Appointed Governor Law School Hometown
David B. Lewis (Presiding)   5th 2005 Brad Henry University of Oklahoma Ardmore, OK
Clancy Smith (Vice) NO 1st 2010 Brad Henry University of Tulsa Tulsa, OK
Robert L. Hudson YES 2nd 2015 Mary Fallin University of Oklahoma Guthrie, OK
Arlene Johnson   4th 2005 Brad Henry University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City, OK
Gary L. Lumpkin   3rd 1988 Henry Bellmon University of Oklahoma Sentinel, OK
Court of Civil Appeals
This court reviews all civil suits and has the power to adjust or reverse the decisions of lower courts. The Oklahoma Chamber and other large corporate interests have greatly stepped up their interest in this court. One pro-business group of the Oklahoma Chamber, Oklahoma Civil Justice Council; hasreviewed the decisions of the judges and scored their "pro business" dispositions.  While there have been abuses of the courts for ridiculous judgments based upon frivolous  "damages", There have also been scores of folks who are further damaged by a legal system stacked against the people of limited means or other severe impediments. 

For Retention
: Thomas Thornbrugh
 Thornbrugh scored a moderate rating with a slight edge away from the pro-business group's preference. He is the brother of a former Tulsa legislator and from a historically active Republican family. His previous district court legacy is also a stellar one.

Against Retention: Larry Joplin
Joplin has been rated a vastly pro big business. His extreme legacy is worth a recall. His appointment was also a lame duck abuse by David Walters. Joplin had been a political appointee in the Walters administration and the court appointment was just another of Walters legacy of burdening the Keating administration with an inability to exercise the full duties of the governor's office.

Not decided: John Fischer

Fischer's low score in the pro big business scorecard puts him near Thornbrugh, but we are still seeking more info before making an initial judgment on him.
Justice Retain? Birthplace Appt. Appointing Governor Law School
E. Bay Mitchell, III
 
Enid, Oklahoma
2002
Frank Keating
University of Oklahoma
Jane Wiseman
 
Tulsa, Oklahoma
2005
Brad Henry
University of Tulsa
Deborah B. Barnes (chief judge)
 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
2008
Brad Henry
Oklahoma City University
Robert D. Bell
 
Norman, Oklahoma
2005
Brad Henry
University of Tulsa
Kenneth L. Buettner
 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1996
Frank Keating
Southern Methodist University
John Fischer

?

Rush Springs, Oklahoma
2007
Brad Henry
University of Oklahoma
Brian Jack Goree
     
Mary Fallin
University of Oklahoma
Jerry Goodman
 
Mangum, Oklahoma
1994
David Walters
Georgetown University
Thomas Thornbrugh

YES

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

2011

Mary Fallin
Oklahoma City University
William C. Hetherington (vice-chief judge)
 
Norman, Oklahoma
2009
Brad Henry
Oklahoma City University
Larry E. Joplin

NO

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
1994
David Walters
University of Oklahoma
W. Keith Rapp
 
Wheelersburg, Ohio
1984
George Nigh
University of Tulsa
Comments
    Opinion of the Editor

    ​Section I

    Picture

    Subscribe to SoonerPolitics daily email news bulletin.
    Enter your email address:




    Archives

    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    August 2015
    January 2015


    Subscribe in a reader
    ​We recently moved our blog. Our archives are still partially stored at our old site. 

    Author

    David Van Risseghem  is the Director of Sooner Politics.org. The resource is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform.  This endeavor seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement...

✕