Constitutional Grounds

Photos from Constitutional Grounds's post

8/7/2020

The NY Attorney General wants to harm the donors to the NRA rather than prosecute supposed criminals. She accused a number of NRA leaders of various crimes, but has not charged them, rather wishes to dissolve the NRA organization instead. Is this how government shuts down or controls the behavior of those who oppose their political philosophies? If there is harm done to the supporters, they may sue. If there was crime, then charge the criminals. The government does not have any cause or authority to end an organization. On a side note, the choice of how to use funds is wholly subjective and not a matter for an AG. See the link to the article here, https://ift.tt/30AKQIe Video of press conference (video starts at 6:45), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQXqr9ynoOw Let us know your thoughts.

(Feed generated with FetchRSS)

Read all of the articles from Constitutional Grounds, at their site.

0 Comments

Constitutional Grounds

David Oldham is a constitutional scholar and political leader. His service to Oklahoma and the nation is highly respected by his peers.
Lori provides strategic and logistical mobilization guidance for civic engagement, She's known for empowering individuals to bring synergy through cooperative alliances for common outcomes.
Her corporate consulting skills have given her decades of experience in maximizing impact in communities, public policy, and marketplace success.

918 . 928 . 7776

SoonerPolitics.org is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform & restored liberty. We seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement... Content of the diverse columns are solely at the discretion of the dozens of websites who create the content. David Van Risseghem is the founder of this platform.
Sooner Politics News is a platform, not a media site. All our bloggers get their feeds promoted regardless of content. As soon as We suppress or delete even one posting, we become an endorser of whatever We didn't censor..The publisher doesn't (and could not) logically agree with all the content, so we would not expect any rational reader to agree, either. What we do hope, is that readers will think for themselves, and at least be better informed of the issues, events, and values that our citizen journalists work hard to provide for free.. We automate much of the tasks so that our sources' content gets as much exposure as possible. We encourage constructive discussion & debate. The solution is more free speech, not less.

Photos from Constitutional Grounds's post