Lt. Gov’s bodyguard quits amid allegations of affair
December 8, 1998 AP
Mrs. Fallin, a Republican who was elected to a second term in 1996, filed for divorce a few weeks after the election. At a hearing, Fallin’s attorney raised an allegation about the lieutenant governor having an affair with an unidentified bodyguard.
In a statement Monday, Public Safety Commissioner Bob Ricks said rumors surfaced in early September about ”alleged unprofessional conduct between a member of the executive security detail and the lieutenant governor.”
The statement said the trooper first denied the allegations, but was again questioned late last month and ”admitted to unprofessional conduct and was permitted to resign. That resignation was accepted last week. His admission did not indicate that sexual activity was involved.”
Lana Tyree, Mrs. Fallin’s attorney, later issued a statement saying the lieutenant governor would have no comment.
”Out of legitimate concern for the privacy and welfare of her minor children through the Christmas holidays, Lieutenant Governor Mary Fallin, having denied the allegations, will not respond to or debate these issues in the media and will make no further public comment,” the statement said. Mrs. Fallin, 43, and her husband have two children, ages 11 and 8.
In court, Mrs. Fallin had said the allegations of an affair with a bodyguard were a rumor started by her husband. At last week’s hearing, District Judge Jerry Bass prevented Fallin’s attorney from pursuing questions about an alleged affair.
In response to a question from his wife’s attorney, Mr. Fallin said he had hired a private investigator to follow her.
Another hearing in the divorce case is set for next Monday.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sex scandal roils Oklahoma politics:Official accused of having affair with trooperGov. Keating Accused of HypocrisyDecember 12, 1998 Kansas City Star (MO)
Lame Duck Appointee Attempt:
Since 1990, the Republicans controlled the commission when they held 2 of the 3 seats. When Commissioner JC Watts was elected to congress in November of 1994, the lame duck governor, David Walters; sought to give the Democrats control of the Commission by appointing former state attorney general Charles Nesbitt as a temporary successor to JC Watts. Gov. Elect, Frank Keating intended to name Ed Apple to the temporary post. The case ended up being argued before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Oklahoma’s governor is sworn in a week after the US Congress swears in their members to a new term. The Daily Oklahoman recapped the drama this way…A brief accompanying Nesbitt’s petition claims Watts’ commission seat “was vacant at the latest on Jan. 3, the date of commencement of the congressional term for which Commissioner Watts was elected,” thus allowing Walters to appoint a replacement. Watts says he did not officially resign his commission seat until Jan. 9, after Keating became governor and gained the right to appoint Apple.
The watchdogs over the state-sanctioned monopolies are called “Corporation Commissioners”. But too often they become cozy with the very corporations they are supposed to be watching.
The Tulsa World said;Bribery scandal: Another Tulsan, Bob Hopkins, a former state corporation commissioner who represented Tulsa County for 28 years in the state Legislature, was convicted in 1994 of accepting a $10,000 bribe from a Southwestern Bell attorney. In return, Hopkins had voted to allow the telephone company to use $30 million in overcharges. Hopkins died in 1997 at age 68. Lame Duck Appointee Attempt:
Since 1990, the Republicans controlled he commission when they 2 of the 3 seats on the Corporation Commission. When Commissioner JC Watts was elected to congress in November of 1994, the lame duck governor, David Walters; sought to give the Democrats control of the Commission by appointing former state attorney general Charles Nesbitt as a temporary successor to JC Watts. Gov. Elect, Frank Keating intended to name Ed Apple to the temporary post. The case ended up being argued before the Oklahoma Supreme Court. Oklahoma’s governor is sworn in a week after the US Congress swears in their members to a new term. The Daily Oklahoman recapped the drama this way…A brief accompanying Nesbitt’s petition claims Watts’ commission seat “was vacant at the latest on Jan. 3, the date of commencement of the congressional term for which Commissioner Watts was elected,” thus allowing Walters to appoint a replacement. Watts says he did not officially resign his commission seat until Jan. 9, after Keating became governor and gained the right to appoint Apple.
Many Oklahoma school districts were found to be collecting far more money in property tax than their operations required. That ‘slush fund’ was secretly invested in money markets. As for where that interest income was finally accrued, was even more secret.
Ironically, it was the IRS which blew the lid on this scheme, by insisting that taxes needed to be paid on this interest income.
Roughly a decade after Okscam came to light, a major scandal broke that grew out of the misuse of education bonds issued by school districts. A word about bonds is in order. Federal officials allowed local officials to issue education bonds to tide them over financially tight periods, as when property tax receipts for schools were late coming in. The bonds were never intended as a means for local education officials to make money, a distinction that was to become quite important as the bond scam unfolded.
During the 1980s, a major bond underwriting company, Stifel, Nicolaus, and Co., was active in promoting the use of bonds to finance public projects. Stifel also engaged in promoting candidates for office via contributions to their campaigns. The Stifel bond company formed a political action committee (PAC) to channel political contributions to candidates, and also channeled contributions through company officers and lobbyists. By these means, they could contribute quite legitimately, just as other businesses did.
Over time, their contributions went to large numbers of legislators, executive branch officials, and others in public life. The list of Oklahoma politicians who received Stifel contributions, via perfectly legitimate channels, added up to a “who’s who” of people and organizations in public life. One wonders if those who failed to receive Stifel contributions felt that something was wrong with them.
A major development in the use of education bonds occurred when the legislature in 1987 changed the law governing the issuance of bonds to allow school districts to issue such bonds without a vote of the people. Three of the key legislators on the committee that formulated the changed law were recipients of Stifel contributions via the channels described. Stifel worked closely with the State School Boards Association to pass word to school districts that they could issue the school bonds without a vote locally. Officials of the Association received large sums in fees. By 1990, some 270 school districts, plus some vo-tech schools and a few counties, were participating.
Unfortunately, many of these participating school districts used the school bonds in the wrong way. They used inflated estimates of their education needs and then issued bonds to meet these needs. Since they overestimated needs, they had money from the bonds beyond that needed immediately. They used the extra funds to make deposits in banks, often in Japan, and then drew interest on the bonds in the banks.
At this point the districts were using the bonds not just to meet needs, but also to make money on the interest collected. And they were to find out that, in doing so, they ended up in serious difficulties with the IRS and other federal officials. In 1991, The Daily Oklahoman launched a series of investigative reports on the school bond program. These reports traced the political influence of Stifel in initiating the bond program and in channeling extensive campaign contributions to large numbers of political figures in the state. The impact of these stories was devastating. School districts began dropping out of the program and participation fell drastically. Then federal authorities became interested, including the IRS, FBI and the SEC. Eventually, two of the state’s largest urban school districts were informed that they had misused their education bonds and owed the IRS large sums. Stifel finally pulled out of the state entirely. In 1996, a onetime leading Stifel official, Bob Cochran, was convicted in federal court of misdeeds connected with the education bonds program, although a year later an appeals court reversed Cochran’s conviction. Most noteworthy here is the initiative from within the state, since it was The Daily Oklahoman that led the way, not federal officials. It is true that federal law enforcement authorities did reinforce the work of the reporters. State law enforcement officials never did contribute much. All in all, this state newspaper deserves much credit for leading reform efforts from within.
In 1991 investigative reporting by the state’s leading newspaper, the Daily Oklahoman, averted a potentially major scandal based on the misuse of bonds for education purposes. That education bonds could be a hazard if not properly handled became apparent when the state’s two largest school districts found themselves charged by the IRS with back taxes amounting in each case to several hundred thousand dollars. The metro districts had been using education bonds not as a legitimate supplement to school spending but as a means of making money via interest accrued on the bonds. Initially the education bond program was hugely popular, with many school districts large and small signing on. However, the investigative reports created skepticism and withdrawals. Had these districts not dropped out of the program, they could have been held liable by the IRS just as the metro districts had been. The investigative reporting by the Oklahoman disrupted the bond scam. Federal intervention, apart from the potential IRS threat, was minimal.
Read more: http://newsok.com/article/2445027
Harry Holloway, of the Oklahoma Historical Society Then in 1990 a scandal emerged from the gubernatorial campaign of winner and Democrat David Walters. Walters won, but the campaign was accompanied by a barrage of press reports that he had raised and spent more money that any previous candidate. Investigations by the state attorney general and Oklahoma County district attorney led to charges of campaign violations. Walters finally pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges. Critics attacked the outcome as letting him escape too easily from more serious charges. Still, the publicity probably moderated some of the worst excesses of campaign finance. And in this case reform had occurred with little federal intervention, in itself a significant gain.
NBC’s “The Tonight Show” host Jay Leno showed the headline to his national television audience and quipped: “It’s no secret now. ” The negotiations concluded Oct. 21 with Walters and his wife, Rhonda, being whisked to the Oklahoma County Courthouse where in a late-night rather secretive court session the state’s chief executive stood before a judge and coolly uttered the word - “Guilty” - to a misdemeanor campaign violation.
The governor’s attorney, R. Thomas Seymour of Tulsa, who elbowed reporters out of the governor’s way, described the seventh-floor courthouse hallway as a scene “straight out of the movies. ” A noisy throng of journalists and television cameramen as well as curious onlookers, had crowded into the courthouse that night to see history unfold.
One of the more prominent politicians convicted in the last 25 years of the state’s history was former Gov. David Walters. Walters pleaded guilty in 1993 to a misdemeanor charge of violating a state campaign law in a plea agreement that dismissed eight felony charges of conspiracy and perjury. The conviction also led to his decision not to run for governor again. Walters, a Democrat, became president of Walters Power International, a company that provides huge electricity-generating mobile plants sometimes located in remote regions. David Hall passed away in the Spring of 2019. He has been living quietly since he left public life on his way to prison.After the terrible governorships of the late 20s & early 30’s, it wasn’t until the 1960s that major scandals again surfaced, and then they did so with a vengeance. Three justices of the Oklahoma Supreme Court were removed from office by impeachment or resignation arising from IRS investigations of reports that justices were taking kickbacks for favorable decisions. A powerful former speaker of the Oklahoma House of Representatives, who had been a dominant figure in state government, was convicted and sent to jail as a result of IRS investigations arising from charges that he failed to report income received in return for political favors. Then in 1975 a former governor, David Hall, was convicted, shortly after leaving office, of misusing his powers of office by trying to direct a state retirement fund to help a friend with a loan. Again, federal officials were the chief agents in cleaning up the corruption. Harry Holloway, of the Oklahoma Historical Society.
In August 1963 I was transferred to Tulsa from Wall Street, in New York, in a corporate headquarters relocation. A month later, on Tuesday evening, September 10, 1963, I attended my first political meeting… the monthly meeting of the Tulsa County Young Republicans.
The guest speaker that evening was Tulsa attorney Walter Hall, Ballot Security Officer for the Oklahoma Republican State Committee. In his speech Hall described in detail the widespread fraud practiced by Oklahoma Democrats in every election. And since Democrats controlled all county and state election boards, the governor’s office, both houses of the legislature, the major law enforcement offices, and the courts, few Republicans were willing to challenge them.
Hall began by explaining that forty-four of Oklahoma’s seventy-seven counties had not provided a secret ballot for voters since statehood in 1907, and that local Democrats regularly used every conceivable illegal device to intimidate voters and to fraudulently control the outcome of elections.
Although state law required that one of the three election officials in each precinct must be a member of the minority party, Democrats systematically recruited loyal party members to register as Republicans so that they could fill the minority positions.
He described how, on election day, after voters had signed the entry log, they were handed a paper ballot and a pencil. And since there were no facilities for marking a ballot in secret, they were obliged to place their ballots on the table and mark them with the three election officials looking on. If the election officials saw a voter mark his/her ballot for even a single Republican candidate, a number of things could happen… none of them good.
Hall explained that, in many Oklahoma counties, the welfare rolls were divided up by precincts and kept on the tables in the polling places. If an individual on public assistance was so unwise as to vote for a Republican, his/her name would be removed from the welfare rolls the instant the voter completed the ballot. In some Oklahoma counties the election officials were so brazen as to keep a trash can next to the ballot box, and any ballot with a Republican vote on it went directly into the trash can. The only ballots in the ballot boxes were straight Democratic tickets.
In other counties they were a bit more subtle and used a technique that Hall referred to as the “lead-under-the-thumbnail trick.” That technique involved breaking the lead from a pencil and tucking it lengthwise under a thumbnail. When the election official took a completed ballot from a voter and the ballot contained a vote for a Republican candidate, the official merely scraped the lead across the face of the ballot, folded the ballot in the normal fashion, and placed it in the ballot box. When the ballot boxes were opened and the ballots were removed, state law required that all ballots with “extraneous markings” be classified as “mutilated ballots” and not counted in the final tally.
In other counties, election officials would allow a thumbnail to grow very long over a period of weeks or months preceding an election. On the day of the election they would file the thumbnail to a sharp point so that, when they took a ballot containing a Republican vote from a voter and prepared to fold it, they merely flicked the sharp nail through the edge of the paper. Ballots with small rips and tears were considered to be “mutilated” and were discarded along with those having extraneous markings.
When the speaker had concluded his remarks and the meeting was adjourned, I didn’t hesitate. I walked directly to the front of the room and approached Mr. Hall. As we shook hands, I said, “I’ve just recently moved to Oklahoma from New York and I’d like to volunteer to form a committee to raise funds and to provide voting booths for all of those counties that don’t have them.”
Hall looked at me, chuckled, and said, “You don’t really think they’ll let you get away with that, do you? The Democrats throw us a bone now and then,” he continued, “or we find them fighting among themselves and we manage to get somebody elected. We’re a distinct minority in Oklahoma and I’m afraid we have to be satisfied with that.” The people standing around the speaker nodded in agreement. “Yeah, that’s right!” they chorused.
I was very disappointed. I thought they’d be angry. As the primary victims of the fraud, I thought they’d be mad enough to do something about it, but they weren’t. They apparently proceeded from the assumption that if they tried, they were bound to fail… and, chances are, they would have. They had asked God for the patience to endure the things they could not change, for the will to change the things they could change, and for the wisdom to know the difference. Unfortunately, they’d put vote fraud in the category of “things they could not change.”
However, on February 8, 1966, I was elected Chairman of the Tulsa County Young Republicans. It didn’t take long for me to conclude that there was one major benefit to being Chairman of the Tulsa County YRs. I knew that if we played our cards right the Tulsa County YRs could do something about vote fraud in Oklahoma.
In mid-February, just days after my election, I created an organization called Operation: Secret Ballot. I appointed five Tulsa County YRs as coordinators, two of whom were also active in the Tulsa Jaycees. We made no public announcements and there was no fanfare… we just did it. More importantly, we had a plan. We knew that very little could be accomplished if the effort was perceived as being a partisan effort. What was needed was a non-partisan front with bipartisan support.
Through the efforts of our two Jaycee coordinators, the Tulsa Jaycees were urged to invite Mr. Hall to be guest speaker at a future meeting. Hall spoke at the June 1966 meeting of the Tulsa Jaycees and the result was totally predictable. They were outraged at what he told them about vote fraud in Oklahoma. We had our non-partisan front.
A Jaycee leader was selected as overall project coordinator, and after a quiet conversation with one or two fair-minded, idealistic members of the Tulsa County Young Democrats… young Democrats who actually believed in honest elections and the rule of law… the project was launched. Operation: Secret Ballot was an organization of mostly Young Republicans, with Jaycee leadership and publicity, and just enough Young Democrats to validate our claim to bipartisanship.
Working with a cabinetmaker from the Jaycees, we designed a voting booth that could be made from simple one-by-two white pine frames, covered with unbleached muslin, and assembled with offset hinges to allow easy folding and stacking for storage.
In late July, the project coordinators sent letters to county election boards in all of the forty-four counties where the secret ballot didn’t exist, informing them that we’d have voting booths available for them, free of charge, by election day, November 8. All they had to do was to decide how many they needed. We would deliver them to their county courthouses during the first week of November.
By mid-August the project assembly line was operational and voting booths were being produced. Every Saturday and every Sunday, from mid-August through late October, the cavernous interior of the voting booth “factory” echoed with the sound of saws, hammers, and staplers. And as the voting booths came off the assembly line they were folded, stacked, and stored along one side of the building. As the weeks passed, our inventory grew and grew.
When responses started coming in from county election boards, we found a mixed reaction. Some counties didn’t respond at all, but among those who did there were both written and oral responses. For the most part, the letters received said, “Thank you! We’ve never been able to afford voting booths in our county.” And they went on to say how many they needed and where to deliver them.
The oral responses were never direct or in writing, they were sent through third party word-of-mouth. Typically, they said, “If you come into our county with your damned voting booths you’ll all go back to Tulsa in pine boxes!”
We had many threats on our lives during the life of Operation: Secret Ballot and, knowing of many instances of violence by Democrats, we took them all very seriously.
In mid-October 1966, Governor Henry Bellmon commented publicly on our election reform project, and within a day or two we were contacted by the Adjutant General of the Oklahoma National Guard. The General informed us that he would make National Guard troops and trucks available to us whenever we needed them. All we had to do was to tell him which counties were to receive voting booths and the number of voting booths to be delivered to each location.
During the first week of November 1966, the National Guard loaded and delivered from eight hundred to a thousand voting booths to counties across the state. Under the glare of public scrutiny, Democrats were afraid not to use them, and on Tuesday, November 8, Oklahoma voters went to the polls and elected a new governor, State Senator Dewey Bartlett, of Tulsa, the second Republican governor in Oklahoma history; they elected a Republican attorney general, Tulsa attorney G.T. Blankenship, the first Republican attorney general in state history; they elected Republicans in two of the state’s six congressional districts; and they elected a Republican state labor commissioner.
We were very pleased that our friend, Dewey Bartlett, would be occupying the governor’s chair for the next four years, but the most significant outcome of Operation: Secret Ballot was the election of a Republican attorney general. Having a Republican attorney general meant that the most powerful Democrat in the state went to prison for eight years, and that a number of State Supreme Court justices… who’d been taking bribes of from $15,000 to $25,000… were impeached and removed from the court. One or two others resigned rather than face the public humiliation of impeachment.
A small group of determined Tulsa County YRs gave the State of Oklahoma the biggest dose of political reform it ever had. The Tulsa Jaycees received the National Community Service Award from the U.S. Jaycees for their role in the project. However, in Republican circles, Operation: Secret Ballot was never mentioned. As the YRs would learn in the months and years to follow, it was typical of the recognition that the Republican Party showers on its most dedicated supporters.
Nevertheless, it is almost certain that Henry Bellmon’s first term as governor (1963-67) and the Operation: Secret Ballot project of 1966 were, taken together, the two political developments that are the basis of the political renaissance that has made Oklahoma the reddest of red states. In 2014, although Democrats still maintained a slight edge in party registration, both U.S. senators, all five members of the U.S. House, the governor, lieutenant governor, and every other statewide office, as well as both houses of the state legislature, were in Republican hands.
Oklahomans can be duly proud of the fact that theirs is the only state in the nation in which in 2012; Barack Obama carried not a single county.
Paul R. Hollrah is a two-time member of the U.S. Electoral College, serving as chairman of Oklahoma’s seven-member delegation in 2004. In 1975 he pioneered the corporate PAC movement, creating and registering the first corporate political action committee with the Federal Election Commission. In 1983 he was the principal founder the National Republican Legislative Campaign Committee, a fundraising arm of the Republican National Committee. A nationally-published blogger, he is retired and resides among the hills and lakes of northeastern Oklahoma.
In 1974 A federal grand jury indicted Winters, for, among other things, of using his position to extort campaign money from banks. Winters was acquitted of four counts during a well publicized trial, and other counts later were dropped. A few weeks after that, he was re-elected.
Winters served five terms and was trying for a sixth when his 1986 campaign was doomed by allegations that a Tulsa bank may have written off millions in loans to him.
In 1986, many Oklahoma banks were on the brink of default from a crash in the oil markets, worldwide. Yet State Treasure Winters, decided to deposit a massive amount of state funds into a non-interest bearing account in Liberty National Bank of Oklahoma.
The Oklahoman reported:
When a high official gets involved in wrongdoing, it’s usually the cover up that gets him in big trouble.
The Democrats were ‘circling the wagons’ when Finis Smith was convicted. They knew it could lead to election losses. When several Democrats wrote to the judge in the Finis Smith trial, they begged for leniency for Smith. That revelation jeopardized several Democrat elected officials.
Well, evidently some operatives thought it would be good strategy to make the Republicans look like their prosecutions were politically motivated. So another Republican federal prosecutor was targeted for a Democrat dirty trick. A letter was forged with the signature of Federal Prosecutor, Layn Phillips. The Federal investigation traced the source of the letter to a typewriter in Democrat mayor Terry Young’s office. Everyone denied involvement and nothing was ever proven. Tulsa World said; One of the biggest stories of 1986 was the so-called “Lettergate” scandal, which toppled Mayor Young’s administration. After various public officials, including Young, wrote letters urging leniency for the Smiths, two subsequent letters with then-U.S. Attorney Layn Phillips’ named forged on them surfaced. The forgeries suggested Phillips would release names of Democratic officials who had written leniency letters in an effort to damage them politically. The Daily Oklahoman said: TULSA Republican Dick Crawford won Tulsa’s mayoral election Tuesday night, defeating independent candidate Patty Eaton and 18 other challengers. With 180 of 188 precincts reporting, Crawford had 44,434 votes to Eaton’s 32,986, in unofficial results. Crawford will take the mayor’s oath May 6, replacing incumbent Terry Young. Democratic nominee Tom Quinn received 10,589 votes. The 17 other candidates running for mayor polled about 4.5 percent of the vote. Eaton conceded defeat as she addressed supporters at the Westin Hotel here. She said she had known from the start it was “risky business” to abandon her race for re-election as water and sewer commissioner to run for mayor. “We had a lot of things going for us, but then we also had a lot of things going against us,” Eaton said. Years later, the Tulsa World wrote a decent summary… The letter that changed an electionSomewhere in this city some sentimental fool has kept a T-shirt, now 16 years old, with “I Ran for Mayor of Tulsa” printed on the front. If you can find it in the bowels of your closet you hold a souvenir from perhaps the wackiest city election season in Tulsa history. The general election of 1986 – an event held, quite aptly, on April Fools’ Day – was a testament to gonzo political pundit Hunter S. Thompson’s axiom: “When the going gets tough, the weird turn pro.” Generally it is wise to let bygone elections be bygones and if ever there was a political season that deserved eighty-sixing in the memory it probably is the political season of ‘86. But with the 2002 city primary and general elections approaching, it’s worth revisiting a moment in city history when voters were especially tuned into city elections. It took the Tulsa County Election Board 88 hours to print a two-sided ballot for the general election that featured 20 candidates for mayor and 27 more candidates for five other city offices. This year we will have a smaller pool of candidates upon whose messages we can focus. Sixteen years ago voters had trouble understanding messages because too many candidates were shouting them. Candidates of almost every age and from every walk of life had descended on the ballot like a swarm of locusts. That year re-election for first-term Mayor Terry Young, a Democrat, had appeared to be a cakewalk. Then came “Lettergate,” a bizarre scandal-ette that erupted a month before the primary. A mysterious letter, later proved to be forged, was given to the Tulsa Tribune by a Young political consultant. The letter implied that then-U.S. Attorney Layn R. Phillips had played politics several weeks earlier when he released names of prominent Democrats who’d written letters to a federal judge urging leniency for ex-state Sen. Finis Smith and his wife, Doris. The Smiths had been convicted on several federal charges and were awaiting sentencing. When the story broke, Phillips asked the FBI to investigate. The letter, carrying Phillips’ forged signature, was traced to a typewriter in Young’s offices. Young said he knew nothing about the origin of the letter. A federal grand jury investigated. While no charges were ever filed, the leniency letter and the letterhead scandal cost Young the election. He lost the Democratic primary by 1,479 votes to political unknown Tom Quinn, owner of a sign company, who acknowledged that the primary was the first time he had ever voted in a city election. The Republican nomination went to another political novice, Dick Crawford. At the time, the City Charter allowed Independent candidates to file up to 10 days before the general election. Eighteen Independents seized the opportunity to run for mayor and 18 Independents jumped into other city races. Shortly before the election, then-Election Board Secretary Harmon Moore paused in his hand-wringing to observe: “We will conduct the election April 1. At this point I don’t know how, but it will go on one way or the other.” Moore didn’t sound at all convincing. He earlier had lamented that he did not know whether to expect 25,000 voters because of apathy and disgust over the political circus, or 150,000 voters because of high interest. (Voter turnout hit a record for a city election at 97,901). On Election Day, voters were presented with a bewildering array of 47 candidates on the ballot. Included were two Kings, two Quinns, six high school seniors, “a Tom, a Dick but no Harry,” (as noted in a Washington Post story about the fluky election) and a retiree calling himself the Candyman, who gave out sweets to anyone nice to him. A candidate nicknamed “Night Train,” also campaigned but never got to fulfill his promise of “restoring good, moral Christian ethics to City Hall.” Some candidates were serious contenders; others, obviously, were jokes waiting to be elected. A few entered races because Democratic and Republican nominees for office were perceived to be political flukes who were ill-prepared to run a large city with complex problems. The front-runner among the mayoral Independents was three-time Water and Sewer Commissioner Patty Eaton, a Democrat. After the primary, Eaton abandoned her bid for a fourth term to that post, and threw her hat into the mayor’s race. She lost the hat and the election by 12,265 votes to Crawford. Quinn ran a distant third. The six high school students received several thousand votes in a turnout that was so large many voters had to cast their ballots while standing on sidewalks outside the polls. On Election Day, a clown in big shoes waddled the streets of downtown Tulsa wearing a placard that touted a candidate. Overhead, a plane swooped through the skies trailing another candidate’s message. A car equipped with a public address system blared still more recommendations. A local radio personality attracted the attention of the New York Times by urging voters to elect him as a write-in candidate. And T-shirts were hawked, emblazoned with the message: “I Ran for Mayor.” Read the full story at the Tulsa World: http://www.tulsaworld.com/archives/how-bad-it-was/article_39df5cec-db61-5fff-b210-19f79aa13463.html |
Corruption ChronicleA retelling of the dubious escapades our past state leaders have been exposed for their role in. Archives
January 2025
Categories |