Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

A United Methodist agency has indicated it has all hands on deck to fight for the fake right that children ought to medically transition their gender. Despite this being unbiblical, immoral, and totally deranged, the agency claims this is the official position of the United Methodist Church.

According to Protestia:

The missive was penned by Bishop Julius C. Trimble, the General Secretary of the General Board of Church and Society, which is one of several official agencies of the United Methodist Church.

In a statement on the denomination’s website titled ‘Protecting Transgender Civil and Human Rights, ‘⁠ he laments that “state, local and other governmental bodies in the United States have already enacted anti-transgender legislation,” which he describes as ‘discriminatory, harmful and unjust.’

If both genders are considered equal under the law, I am having trouble seeing how there is “discriminatory, harmful, and unjust” legislation being brought forward. This statement likely has to do with the fact that trans activists don't want equal rights — they want special privileges granted at the expense of half the population, usually women's rights. And the fact that they lump children into this fake pursuit makes it all the more deranged.

Trimble points out that several Democratic congressmen and women have introduced a Transgender Bill of Rights, which he lauds as important and needed legislation that will “protect and codify the rights of transgender and nonbinary people under the law and ensure their access to medical care, shelter, safety, and economic security.’ and seeks to spur them to action.

When the agency claims this will grant things like shelter, what this likely means is placing men with women in homeless shelters. This is not a right that should be up for debate — as it is no right at all.

Someone should really inform the agency that God makes no mistakes. Medically transitioning gender, especially for children, will always be reprehensible. Why they make this controversial is both delusional and unserious. Real problems are going on in this world, and the fact that the agency resorts to fighting fake ones that don't exist in reality proves how much their statement should be condemned.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 31, 2026 at 05:43PM - Madison W
United Methodist "Church" Supports Sex Changes for Children
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

The left won't hesitate to bend over backwards for a man who was killed after he resisted arrest and took enough fentanyl to kill a horse. You would expect, at the very least, that they would honor an innocent woman killed after obtaining refuge in this country as a result of the war in Ukraine. The problem with doing that, though, is that they would have to admit leftist "restorative justice” policies allowed a psycho with a painfully long rap sheet to enter back into society, where he then, subsequently, killed an innocent woman riding on the bus. So, rather than do the morally superior thing, the mayor of Providence has called to take down the mural honoring this victim, because he claims it is divisive.

According to Fox News:

The mayor of Rhode Island's capital city is calling for a mural reportedly backed by Elon Musk to honor Iryna Zarutska —the Ukrainian woman whose brutal murder while riding a North Carolina train prompted calls for harsher punishment for career criminals — to be taken down.

The office of Mayor Brett Smiley told Fox News he wanted the artwork taken down.

"The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the misguided, isolating intent of those funding murals like the one across the county is divisive and does not represent Providence," Smiley said in a statement.

He said he continued to "encourage our community to support local artists whose work brings us closer together rather than divide us."

The artist never intended to divide the people with the mural, and it is disgusting to him, the victim, her family, and all the law-abiding citizens of this country, to make such a claim. This mural has nothing to do with politics, or at the very least, it shouldn't. But the problem is that the left has no one to blame but themselves. It is their policies that allow career criminals to remain free to roam and jeopardize public safety, which de facto made this crime possible.

This crime was 100% preventable because the man should have been in prison.

According to Trump, the victim “escaped a brutal war only to be slain by a hardened criminal set free to kill in America.” There is no better representation of the situation than that. This should not be controversial, but according to the left, holding people accountable for their crimes is a greater sin than the crime itself. It is totally deranged.

Zarutska’s life mattered, and because of leftist soft-on-crime policies, it was taken far too soon. That is something that should never be forgotten, and it is disgusting that politicians like Smiley mock her death, as if it is nothing more than partisan politics. This is reprehensible, at best.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 31, 2026 at 05:41PM - Madison W
Democrats demand removal of mural honoring memory of woman murdered by illegal immigrant, claim it's "divisive"
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Ilhan Omar, the SAVE America Act "disenfranchises half of the population in the United States."

She claims this is because many married women have changed their last names and that some might not be able to access the documents to prove they are who they say they are. And if this is true, this is nothing more than a personal problem. If people want to vote in federal elections, it should be their duty to obtain these documents. This is also not controversial legislation by any means, as proven time and again by the massive polling data in existence.

In case it was not clear to Omar, when someone gets married, they get this little thing called a “marriage certificate.” Additionally, when they are born, there is also a document called a “birth certificate.” These are not hard documents to obtain by any means. So, not only is it a lie to claim it is nearly impossible to have such documents, but it is a deeply pathetic excuse to override the will of the people.

According to NBC:

It’s a policy long opposed by Democrats in Congress, who liken it — along with the bill's proof-of-citizenship requirement to register to vote — to nefarious Jim Crow-era laws aimed at preventing African Americans from voting.

But that message is increasingly falling flat with the American public, including Black voters, as photo IDs are increasingly required for common activities, like flying.

A Pew Research Center poll in August tested a variety of election rules and found that 83% of U.S. adults support “requiring all voters to show government-issued photo identification to vote,” while 16% oppose it. That’s up from 77% support in a 2012 Pew poll.

Why do people like Omar insist they know better than 83% of Americans? Does she really think voters are that stupid? Or is she really that stupid? Draw your own conclusions.

Why the left refuses to listen to the people they take oaths to represent is beyond reason, but this may or may not have a thing or two to do with the fact that they cannot win if voters prove who they say they are. That is just my two cents. You can do the math.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 31, 2026 at 04:54PM - Madison W
Ilhan Omar makes silly claim voter ID would “disenfranchise” half of the population, can’t explain how or why
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

The View claims that children are unaffordable. We found the study these ladies cited, and to say there are some problems with the data would be an understatement. Today’s show breaks it down.

“Has any advice from the left made your life any better?” Crowder said. “This kind of advice is reflected in birth rates and marriage rates, and our society is significantly weaker because people bought it.”

According to Sunny Hostin, you need an annual income of $400,000 a year to afford childcare. However, this could not be further from the truth.

“It is wrong on a multitude of levels,” Crowder said.

According to Lending Tree, “With average annual costs for care of an infant and a 4-year-old reaching $28,190, a family would need to earn $402,708 a year to stay within that benchmark. However, typical two-child households earn just $145,656, falling far short of what affordability standards suggest.”

This takes into account the claim that parents must use seven percent of their income for childcare, which is how the “study” gets to the $400,000 a year number. It is a bit bizarre, however, that the study did not take into account that over 60% of families have no child care arrangements, that only about 8% use a daycare center, and that 2% take their kids to work.

“They will try to tell you that those people are poor and therefore, they are miserable,” Crowder said. “This is something you really do have to deprogram yourself — this idea that wealth equals better child rearing — that having material possessions will make a happier family. Or that if you don't have a lot of money and you start your family early, you are going to struggle forever financially, and it is not worth it, and it is not reckless.”

The data disproves this.

Lower-income and single households have more kids. The birth rates for married women, part-time working women, and nonworking women are 1.9, 2.3, and 2.4.

“It goes up when you have someone at home with the children,” Crowder said. “You save that money, and you have more control and time with the most important people in your life — your children, and you actually get to raise them.”

March 31, 2026 at 12:16PM - Madison W
Watch: Debunking "The View's" unhinged rant against Americans having more children
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

The national average cost of childcare is approximately $15,000 per year. In New York City, that number can shoot as high as $26,000. However, when Socialists run things, stuff gets really expensive. This is what makes it a scandal that a new daycare center for New York City municipal workers will cost nearly $60,000 per kid — more than double the private cost.

According to the New York Post:

Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the opening of a new daycare center for municipal workers Monday that will cost more than double the average price of child care — to a tune of nearly $60,000 per kid.

The pilot program will start this fall on the first floor of David N. Dinkins Municipal Building in Lower Manhattan after a multi-million-dollar renovation of a room for just 40 children, ages six weeks to 3 years old.

The childcare center co-ops an initiative of Mamdani’s predecessor, Mayor Eric Adams, that was announced in October.

While the city claims this is just the startup cost, and the price will decrease to $47,000 per kid, the math still does not add up.

Why is it that when the left steps in to operate things, all on the taxpayers' dime, it costs exponentially more than the private sector? The only program this will be popular for is the 40 municipal workers who will profit off it, while many New Yorkers must bear the cost themselves. Is that the leftist compassion we keep hearing about?

Isn't it weird that when Socialists start running things, government workers seem to be the only ones who profit? Weird how that always works out.

Wouldn't it be much cheaper to give these municipal workers vouchers and cover the cost of childcare in the private sector? Wouldn't that make much more sense? For a city that seems to be in a budget shortfall, they do an awful job of balancing the funds.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 31, 2026 at 11:50AM - Madison W
Mamdani gives government employees "free" healthcare that costs double what taxpayers pay for it themselves
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

There are few people more deserving of ridicule than unironic influencers. It's pronounced "in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrr" as if you are a valley girl from the 80s. So when there is a dispute in a park between an old man sitting on a bench and an in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrr carrying on about her live stream, the old man is always in the right.

Standard viral video disclaimers apply. Where the video originates from is unknown. It also recirculates around Cousin Elon's internets every so often, so it's not new, but we here at the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website felt you could use a palate cleanser from Iran and No Kings.

The low-key best part about the video is how ridiculous some of the words said online sound when part of an IRL conversation.

The dispute can best be summarized with the in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrr being all "but muh live stream" and the old man being all "piss on your live stream." That was the old man's bench. He sits on it every day and he was going to sit on it that day. When the in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrrs and the followers and the whole internet tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree beside the river of truth, and tell the in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrrs — “No, you move.”

The in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrr kept carrying on about her followers and how she was trying to film a nice fitness video for her followers and how her followers didn't want to see an old man sitting on a park bench. Her followers want to see HER. At this point, the man ended the argument.

Your followers. Oh, are you Jesus now, are you?

Sorry, I take it back. The man only mostly ended the argument. This was the mic drop after the in-flu-ence-rrrrrrrrrr whined that it wasn't fair.

Are you from that snow flake brigade, are you?

Boom. After three rounds, the old man is declared the winner by TKO. Though it's the UK. One has to be careful about speaking one's mind.

• Parents call cops on their son over the crime of (check notes) posting right-wing opinions on social media
• Man warns daughter about avoiding migrant hotels, gets gross visit from police confronting his apparent thought crime
• Blogger finds out the hard way that anti-Hamas memes are illegal in the UK when the police show up
• Police arrest bro for yelling "We love bacon," apparently it's illegal in the UK depending on where you're protesting
• UK police laugh at absurdity of confronting citizens over social media posts, now a probe is launched against HIM

But the woman he expressed his opinion to hasn't been imported from the third world and doesn't appear to be trans, so the old man should be safe for now.

><><><><><><

Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Sign up for our DAILY EMAIL BLASTS! They can't stop us from delivering our content straight to your inbox. Yet.

March 31, 2026 at 06:54AM - Brodigan
Entitled female 'influencer' whines old man is ruining her livestream, he lets her know how little he gives a rip
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

You don't need to be a biologist to understand there is a physical difference between males and females. This is such a well-known fact that even cavemen understand this concept. The left, however, woke up one day and decided that there is no difference, despite reality proving otherwise. This is why the Department of Justice is suing Minnesota, as they have allowed boys to invade the female division of sports for far too long.

According to the New York Post:

The Department of Justice sued Minnesota on Monday for discriminating against female athletes by letting biological males compete against them and enter their bathrooms and locker rooms.

These asinine policies don't just destroy the integrity of the game: They actively jeopardize women's safety.

The suit, filed in Minnesota federal court, alleges that the state’s Department of Education and the Minnesota State High School League have been implementing policies and practices that ignored “undeniable physiological differences between male and female athletes” in violation of Title IX.

To claim the state ignored “undeniable physiological differences” would be an understatement at this point.

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon noted in the 45-page civil filing that the state also committed the violations while taking more than $3 billion in federal funding per year and agreeing to uphold nondiscriminatory policies.

This is an objectively good thing. The problem, however, is that this needed to be done in the first place. For far too long, the left has turned a blind eye to these blatant biological differences all under the fake guise of compassion, and they are destroying women's rights in the process. The fact that the left claims to be all in it to end the patriarchy, while effectively uplifting misogyny, is a scandal in itself.

Trans women are men. Why the state refuses to acknowledge this painfully obvious fact is beyond reason.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 30, 2026 at 05:44PM - Madison W
DOJ sues Minnesota For Allowing Males In Girls’ Sports
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Sunny Hostin, it is better not to be born at all than to grow up poor. This is because in her eyes, children are for the elites, such as herself, while you should not be afforded such a blessing.

Isabel Brown delivered a message at CPAC to the younger generation: Get married and have kids. As far as life goals go, this should be one of the most noncontroversial messages in the history of messages. However, this was a problem for the ladies on “The View,” as they mocked those who desire such a lifestyle.

According to Mediaite:

The View co-host Sunny Hostin called Brown’s suggestion “reckless.”

“I think it’s really reckless to be suggesting that people should have more children when you now know in this country there’s this affordability crisis, and for a two-person household, a married household, you need over $400,000 for childcare. Over $400,000. Most people don’t make over $400,000.”

It is unclear where she got this number from because it costs nowhere near that amount to raise a child.

When Hostin was asked if she meant this was over the cost of a lifetime, she clarified it was a year.

You don't have to be an economist to know this is nonsense. According to Family Studies, “a middle-income family of four is expected to pay $233,610 per child from birth to age 18.”

Does she really think people are this stupid?

“So she’s advocating for people to be born into poverty, people not being able to feed those children, people not being able to educate those children, and people not being able to house those children, at the same time when this government is cutting all of the services that would allow people to have families and big families,” Hostin said.

No. That is not what she is advocating for, and the only way you can come to that conclusion is by lying or being objectively stupid. Unclear which one Hostin is, so draw your own conclusions.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

March 30, 2026 at 05:41PM - Madison W
The shrill harpies on "The View" lash out at conservative influencer who says having lots of kids is a good thing
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder