Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Rep. Robert Garcia, he is watching Donald Trump, Kristi Noem, and Tom Homan, and he is “going to ensure that we get justice for our communities.” This is in response to the “crimes” he claims are being perpetrated by the government. However, he said nothing about the crimes people commit when they break federal immigration laws, but that is likely because this rant was in response to defend these people, despite the threat it poses to American communities.

What a total clown. Does he really think this is going to scare them and stop deportation efforts? Or is this all a show to appease the radical left mob?

How exactly will he get justice for these foreign nationals? And how will he hold authorities accountable? Because last time I checked, he has like zero power in doing that — but that is neither here nor there.

According to ABC 7:

Almost six months after the immigration raids began in Los Angeles, congressional Democrats held a field hearing Monday to bring accountability, help families locate their loved ones, and highlight what they call a majority of unlawful detentions by the Trump administration.

Mayor Karen Bass and Rep. Robert Garcia led a march before the hearing in downtown Los Angeles to gather testimony from people impacted by immigration enforcement.

Pathetic. Truly pathetic. Don’t you wish these people fought for American citizens the way they do for illegals? Yeah, one can only dream.

"In this county, no one is above the law and the constitution protects everybody. The constitution clearly states due process is afforded to all people. Not just U.S. citizens," said Long Beach Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Last time I checked, foreign nationals don’t have a right to be here. Additionally, it’s so disingenuous and deranged that they pretend ICE is going after American citizens. That’s not a thing, and I would like him to point to at least one instance where that happened. But he won’t, because again, these are falsehoods.

"We want to establish a record because when the political winds change, we want to hold those accountable,'' Bass said during the rally. "We want transparency and accountability for all of the egregious unconstitutional acts that are taking place.''

Oh, look. More of the same. Now some more leftists promising to go after people solely because they disagree with them politically. In fact, it’s far worse than that. He wants to go after people when a leftist is in office simply because they were enforcing the law. You truly cannot make this level of insanity up.

Again, maybe — just maybe — these officials will defend you like they do foreigners, but that is unlikely, as he vows to go after everyone and anyone who does just that. Not that we needed reason one million that these people will never represent you, but here it was. Disappointing, yet deeply unsurprising.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

November 30, 2025 at 06:44AM - Danielle B
Democrat official threatens to go after Trump to "get justice for our communities.” He's talking about illegals.
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Last May, a drag queen staged a protest against the Trump Administration by flying a trans flag loud and proud at Yosemite National Park. The problem? It was against park rules. So while he may have believed this stunt would send a message to the president that trans people “exist,” it ended up costing one of his own “allies” her job.

And rather than take this as a lesson, they’ve taken the termination notice as an opportunity to double down—because apparently, the crucial thing at hand is making sure you know he exists.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

The enormous 55-by-35-foot banner, first unfurled on El Capitan in May as part of a climber-led demonstration, was repurposed into a flowing dress worn by drag environmentalist Pattie Gonia on the red carpet at Out100 — an annual tribute to influential LGBTQ+ figures — at Nya Studios West in Hollywood on Friday, Nov. 21.

Wow. Slay, queen. Just slaying it everywhere you go, aren’t we?

Beside her stood SJ Joslin, the transgender Yosemite park ranger and wildlife biologist who was fired over the summer for helping mount the flag in the national park from the rock’s Heart Ledges.

Joslin, an Out100 honoree this year, has become a symbol of the fallout from the El Capitan action — a flashpoint in a broader national clash over transgender rights and public-lands policy.

Why do these people care so much about whether the president validates their indescribable feelings? Activists insist that whatever they “feel” not only defines their identity but somehow defines womanhood itself. But why is it the job of the leader of the free world to weigh in on anyone’s internal emotions? Their existence isn’t in dispute — they quite literally exist, which is how we’re all having this conversation. And while plenty of people may disagree with their life choices, that doesn’t mean anyone is pretending they’re imaginary. In reality, we can only wish this whole story were satire. But it’s 2025, where vague, self-declared feelings are treated as more authoritative than objective reality.

“Raising this flag in the heart of El Capitan is a celebration of our community, standing in solidarity with each other and all targeted groups,” they told the Los Angeles Times after their dismissal. “Being trans is a natural, beautiful part of human and biological diversity.”

If being trans is a “natural, beautiful part of human and biological diversity,” then why does the explanation always seem to involve rejecting the biological facts surrounding their existence? If it were truly natural, why does it contradict what every cell in the body reflects? And if biology is supposedly so diverse, why does the entire conversation still revolve around moving from one of the two established sexes to the other? That part is still unclear as of writing this — but you can be sure those feelings are officially deemed “valid.”

As of writing this, trans people do, in fact, still exist. I received that memo long before this protest, and someone should really pass it along to these activists, too. Because in this exaggerated crusade to fight the fight, they’re battling imaginary forces no one is actually deploying against them. And, unfortunately for this drag queen, that disconnect is starting to look like a personal problem more than a political one.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

November 30, 2025 at 06:42AM - Danielle B
Yosemite Drag Queen Has Another Message for the Trump Administration: “We Will Keep Showing Up”
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Last week, Jasmine Crockett accused several Republicans of taking money from someone named Jeffrey Epstein. Some argue she did this to imply they took donations from a man accused of some of the worst crimes known to humanity. However, it turns out that Jeffrey Epstein is more of a common name than some assumed. This is why it was both disingenuous and a lie for her to make that claim. She even found the nerve to suggest the point was not to mislead the public, even though we all know exactly what this imbecile was doing.

Her defense? She implied she said “a Jeffrey Epstein,” even though she never actually said the word “a.” But that’s neither here nor there. There was no point in her little rant if she didn’t intend to mislead the public — draw your own conclusions.

That being said, “a Jeffrey Epstein” would like to clear the record.

You heard that right, folks. You know who also took donations from “a Jeffrey Epstein”? Jasmine Crockett herself. Incredible. You cannot make this level of political theater up.

Why did she not call herself out? Maybe because the point wasn’t to bring attention to people with similar names, but because, just maybe, she wanted you to believe Republicans are complacent in this mess. I don’t know — you do the math.

Why would she care if “folks also named Jeffrey Epstein” took money? She wouldn’t. And if I didn’t know any better, I’d say she was banking on naive voters assuming she had uncovered something scandalous — but I do know better, so I won’t say that.

Why would she have her team dig into something so meaningless? Why?! At best, she was just vague enough to make uninformed people second‑guess what they heard. At worst, she knew exactly what she was doing and did it anyway. And yes — both can be true at the same time.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

November 29, 2025 at 06:21AM - Danielle B
As it turns out, "Jeffrey Epstein" donated to Jasmine Crockett too
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

This might be Joy Reid’s worst take yet, and that says a lot.

According to Joy Reid, illegals “is just the N-word for brown people.” And the reason why that is so racist is because an immigrant, illegal or not, is not a race. But that was not even the worst thing she said.

Of course, Reid had to go after Usha Vance, claiming she has to leave JD because “the base of MAGA is fundamentally racist."

Does she really think people are this stupid?

Firstly, she does realize that calling half the country racist is not only severely played out at this point—so much so that it’s essentially meaningless—but that this rhetoric is what cost the left the election in the first place?

Secondly, she knows nothing about JD Vance’s marriage, and it’s disgusting that she speaks as if she’s a moral authority on this matter. No one cares if “the successor to MAGA” is “the guy with the brown Hindu wife,” and it’s totally deranged that she even made that claim.

She also claimed that it was MAGA who is “opposed to non-white immigrants” and that “hatred and bigotry” fuel the movement. But if that were true, why is it not true? She can’t even come up with a new lie at this point.

It’s also not a racial slur to call an illegal alien “illegal” if it’s a fact, because facts are facts and they can’t be racist. But she likely knows that, doesn’t she? Thus, we can only assume Reid is a miserable liar pretending she knows a thing or two about a thing or two, and she could not be more off if her life depended on it.

What did she even mean when she claimed Usha “was in on it”? In on what? And again, the fact that she pretends she knows anything about this marriage is deeply deranged and a level of arrogance no one knew was possible. And worst of all? They had to mock Erika Kirk as if she’s not grieving through one of the worst tragedies one can go through. Totally disgusting. And it speaks volumes about who they truly are, not the other way around.

These are some miserable and awful women, and that is putting it lightly.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

November 29, 2025 at 06:18AM - Danielle B
Joy Reid claims there is a brand new "n-word" you keep using that you need to stop
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML

Click to set custom HTML

Click to set custom HTML

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

In case you have not heard, the world’s strongest woman is a man. Today’s show gets into it.

According to GB News:

A trans athlete has sparked outrage after being crowned "World's Strongest Woman" in Texas.

American competitor Jammie Booker, who was born male, secured first place ahead of Britain's Andrea Thompson, who appeared to storm off the podium in protest.

Since the verdict, athletes and coaches have declared Thompson the rightful champion.

"Only women have voted for this. Across demographics, across races, men have repeatedly said this is not right. You have this because of feminism," Crowder said. "Women, you need to start policing your own."

In a 2017 video uploaded to YouTube, Brooker admitted to being a “21-year-old trans woman with a history of abuse struggling to stay true to herself.”

Three-time World's Strongest Woman champion Rebecca Roberts revealed that neither competitors nor event organisers were aware of Booker's background before the competition.

“This is simply a lesser man beating the best woman by a nose,” Crowder said.

In comparison, Brooker completed one rep at 250 lbs. However, the strongest man was able to do seven reps at 352 lbs. Brooker then set the unofficial world record for “world’s strongest woman” with a 10-meter yoke walk of 750 lbs. No surprise he would set zero records in the men’s competition, as the world record is over 1,200 lbs.

"Across the board, the strongest man is significantly stronger than the strongest woman, and the strongest woman is generally not as strong as the strongest man. It’s not fair, and it’s not right. We’ve had men’s and women’s divisions forever for a reason."

This is why it’s important to stop voting for people who condone and affirm this nonsense.

“Women, start voting correctly; otherwise, it only gets worse for you,” Crowder said.

November 25, 2025 at 01:22PM - Danielle B
Watch: Turns out the World's Strongest Woman is actually a man
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

If your entire existence is dedicated to convincing the global masses that humanity will cease to exist solely because the weather may or may not be changing, you’ve got to do better than turn water green. Nonetheless, that is all Greta Thunberg and activists with Extinction Rebellion had up their sleeve, and that decision just got them banned from entering Venice for at least 48 hours.

Look, if you can’t be trusted to enter one of the world’s greatest cities because authorities fear you might turn the water green, that tells you all you need to know about their cause.

According to Fox News:

Climate activist Greta Thunberg has been slapped with a 48-hour ban from entering Venice, Italy after joining Extinction Rebellion protesters in dyeing the Grand Canal bright green, according to reports.

The Swedish activist, 22, was also fined $172 along with roughly 35 other demonstrators involved in the action, per The Telegraph.

Extinction Rebellion said the dye used was a fluorescent, non-toxic tracer commonly employed in environmental studies, such as tracking water flows or monitoring leaks. The group reportedly insisted the dye posed no ecological threat.

How about just not messing with the water? Is that so hard for these toddlers to do?

The group also argued the stunt was designed to "draw attention to the massive effects of climate collapse," and claimed that Venice is among Europe’s most vulnerable cities due to rising sea levels and increasingly frequent flooding.

Do they really think tourists are going to see green water and think to themselves, “Gee, I better jump on whatever bandwagon these people are on. They must really be on to something!”? At best, zero people were convinced of whatever lie they want you to believe. At worst, more people ended up despising their movement. And I think I am leaning towards the latter.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

November 25, 2025 at 10:18AM - Danielle B
Greta Thunberg banned from Venice with other lunatics for turning the water green in the name of climate extinction
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML