Dear Subscribers, We just reached the one-year birthday for my Substack, The Right Way, and so it’s time to say a few words about it. When I posted my first article on this site, “How I Murdered The Weekly Standard” on August 20th, I didn’t know much about Substack. That first post went out to 500 people that I had compiled from an old email list— mostly fellow journalists. At that time, I was working for Newsmax as their chief White House correspondent. A lot can happen in 12 months. By early November, The Right Way had 10,000 readers. I was pleased that my first post received about 48,000 page views. I was astonished that my August 30th post — “How The National Review Sold Its Soul To Google” — received more than 128,000 page views. Substack seemed like the future to me in 2021, but the reality was that it had already displaced corporate media websites as the best place for journalism to flourish without government-sponsored censorship. via Emerald Robinson One of the most important reports in the world has been released by a group of German scientists who call themselves The Working Group For COVID Vaccine Analysis. The members of the group have chosen to remain anonymous at the moment because vaccine critics “have been publicly defamed, ostracized, and economically ruined.†That’s a wise decision — considering the contents of this report. This working group has made several preliminary discoveries that will reverberate around the world. The conclusion of this group’s report is simple and stark: all COVID vaccine programs must be halted immediately. Why? Because every COVID vaccine that was tested was toxic to human beings. To make matters worse: the blood of vaccinated individuals has been corrupted in terrible ways, including deformed red blood cells, blood clots, elevated blood viscosity, and the presence of “novel structures†made of strange materials that “cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.†Let me repeat: all COVID vaccines that were tested contained “substances the purpose of which cannot be determined.†(Figures 4 & 5 from the report) The inescapable conclusion from this report will send shockwaves throughout the world: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans and they were designed to be toxic. Dangerous substances and toxic metals that were never disclosed by Pfizer or Moderna or AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson are found consistently in blood samples and, therefore, cannot be “accidental contaminants†but rather ingredients that were secretely and deliberately included in the vaccines. I want to highlight four of the group’s discoveries: The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. The fourth discovery: The vaccines consistently contain substances the purpose of which cannot be determined. Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the COVID-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes. (Figure 3 from the report) The first discovery: toxic substances were found in all of the samples of COVID-19 vaccines — without exception. From the report: “In all samples of COVID-19 vaccines, without exception, components were found, using several methods of measurement, that: — are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines, — had not been declared by the manufacturers as present in the vaccines, — are for the most part metallic, — are visible under the dark-field microscope as distinctive and complex structures of different sizes, — can only partially be explained as a result of crystallisation or decomposition processes, — cannot be explained as contamination from the manufacturing process.†What this means: the COVID vaccines are toxic to humans, and they are deliberately toxic. Let me repeat: The vaccines were designed to be toxic to humans. (A portion of page 18 of the report) The second discovery: The blood samples of all the people who had been vaccinated showed marked changes. From page 9 & 10 of the report:
What this means: The vaccines contaminate human blood itself — causing blood clots and red blood cell damage and elevated blood viscosity. (Figure 1 from page 30 of the report) The third discovery: The greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent are vaccine side effects. According to the report: “The mRNA needs a protective envelope to enter the cells. This protective envelope consists of nanolipids. The nanolipids are stabilised by layers of polyethylene glycol ( NOTE: The renowned journalist Thomas Lipscomb has just completed a new manuscript titled The Oswald Letter and it contains a number of staggering claims on the true story of the Kennedy Assassination based on newly released documents — as well as fresh accounts from new eyewitnesses who have never before been interviewed. This is the fifth excerpt from The Oswald Letter to appear here on my Substack. Read Part 1: Lee Harvey Oswald’s Last Call Read Part II: Lee Harvey Oswald Was Trained by The CIA Read Part III: Hidden In Plain Sight Read Part IV: The Secret of the Zapruder Film On April 17th, 1961, there was a nighttime invasion of Cuba by CIA-trained Cuban exiles. It was intended to overthrow the new Communist Castro government just 90 miles from the United States — but it collapsed most embarrassingly in just two days — and it happened only three months into the new Kennedy Presidency. President Kennedy had inherited the invasion plan from the Eisenhower Administration. A Brigade named “2506†(composed of about 1500 Cuban dissidents) was trained and equipped in Guatemala under the CIA. Brigade 2506 was told there would be a general Cuban uprising to support them once they landed on a swampy coast-line at the Bay of Pigs on the south coast of Cuba. The Brigade had its own ships — and a fleet of B-26s and other aircraft in support — repainted in Cuban air force colors pretending to be Cuban air force defectors. They were to take out the Castro Cuban air force, and other targets in advance. While publicly pretending to take “sole responsibility†for the ensuing failure at the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy’s inner circle quickly spread the word about his true feelings. They put out the word privately, and widely throughout the media and the Washington establishment, that JFK had been duped into going forward with a disastrous plan by the assurances of the American military and the CIA. In any case, Kennedy’s first big venture on the Cold War foreign policy stage was a total fiasco. He was publicly humiliated — but his PR team succeeded in winning sympathy for the gallant young president among influential Washingtonians who agreed that he was “forced into failure†by incompetent advisers. Although no one realized it at the time, the ramifications of this PR effort were to haunt the Kennedy Administration until its end. Our perceptions today of what really happened at the Bay of Pigs are artfully and purposefully distorted by self-interested accounts by the participants, and their allies and institutions, overlayed by the prejudices of pro and anti-Kennedy factionalism, along with the weighting of partisan historians and journalists. The only thing everyone agrees on is that it was a fiasco — but whose fiasco? Daily Mail cartoon April 21, 1961 by Leslie Gilbert Illingworth Kennedy began his reputation-rehabilitation campaign by a most curious face-saving meeting with his predecessor, President Eisenhower, just as the last defeated remnants of his Bay of Pigs invasion force were being marched to prison in Havana. On April 22, 1961 — just five days after the Bay of Pigs fiasco — President Kennedy sent a helicopter to Ike’s Gettysburg farm to fly him to Camp David for secret talks. He told Eisenhower that he had followed the advice of the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and “everybody had approved†the invasion. The meeting itself, if not the private talks, was set up for major public consumption with dozens of reporters and photographers and a full contingent of military aides. Kennedy was publicly signaling his careful consultation with America’s preeminent military hero, while he was privately blaming the Eisenhower plan that had failed him to anyone who would listen. Eisenhower informed Kennedy in short terms that not only had the operation been a military disaster, but it had been worse: it had let Khrushchev see that he was weak. “I just took their advice,†Kennedy pleaded, meaning the CIA and the Chiefs of Staff. After leaving the meeting, the new president was visibly shaken. According to an anonymous source at The New York Times, President Kennedy “wanted to splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.†Kennedy subsequently dismissed CIA head Allen Dulles, and others at the CIA — and reassigned others. Presidential historian Robert Dallek summarizes JFK’s point of view clearly: “Afterward, Kennedy accused himself of naïveté for trusting the military’s judgment that the Cuban operation was well thought-out and capable of success. ‘Those sons of bitches with all the fruit salad just sat there nodding, saying it would work,’ Kennedy said of the chiefs.’†“He repeatedly told his wife, ‘Oh my God, the bunch of advisers that we inherited!’ Kennedy concluded that he was too little schooled in the Pentagon’s covert ways and that he had been overly deferential to the CIA and the military chiefs. He later told Schlesinger that he had made the mistake of thinking that ‘the military and intelligence people have some secret skill not available to ordinary mortals.’†Kennedy’s heavily publicized meeting with Eisenhower — the man whose plan supposedly had blown up on Kennedy — was a well-planned exercise in duplicity. However, Eisenhower’s notes on the meeting clarify the reality behind the intended obfuscation. The key point turned on Kennedy’s paramount concern to Eisenhower about undertaking the Cuban invasion: “the State Department ‘thought that we should be very careful that our hand not show in this operation.’ If the United States airplanes carried out airstrikes, the diplomats argued, there would be no question of American involvement. They persuaded him to cancel a second bombing run in support of the exiles because ‘the Soviets would be very apt to cause trouble in Berlin.’†Ike was astounded by this reasoning. Everyone would know that the United States had been complicit. Where else would the invaders have gotten their ships, their arms, and their communications? Ike says that he told Kennedy that there was “only one thing to do when you go into this kind of thing. It must be a success.†In one sentence, Eisenhower demonstrated what Kennedy’s real failure had been at the Bay of Pigs: he had sacrificed military effectiveness for absurd political public relations concerns. It hadn’t been the advice of the CIA or the military which had doomed his venture, as he had stated to his close associates. Kennedy had been listening to the advice of the State Department, and his political advisers, in conducting a military operation. Indeed, there had been a carefully developed invasion plan. Eisenhower had commissioned it early in 1960 under Vice President Richard Nixon’s direction. But Kennedy not only did not follow the Eisenhower plan, he made critical last-minute changes that doomed it to failure before it was executed, exactly as he had told Eisenhower — for political considerations. That plan, called “Pluto,†was created under the CIA’s Richard Bissell. Trinidad is a small city 200 miles from Havana, on the south coast of Cuba, in the province of Sancti Spiritus which is south of Santa Clara. From the immediate aftermath of Castro’s revolution in 1959 to 1965, this area was the center of a large number of dissident groups opposing the Communist regime of Fidel Castro. From the earliest revolutionary allies of Castro who did not want a Communist state to former Batista supporters to small farmers resisting collectivism, it totaled thousands of people. In the end, it would take Castro raising 250,000 militia members to finally suppress their uprising — four years after the Bay of Pigs in 1965. What made the location an ideal hideout for the dissidents was the presence of the wild and extensive Escambray Mountains less than an hour’s drive from Trinidad. The thickets and ravines of the Escambray already held thousands of the anti-Castro guerillas — and the CIA was supplying them, with some difficulty because of the remote location. The mission was comparatively simple: train and equip Cuban exile troops in Guatemala, make arrangements for them to acquire the ships they needed to carry them (along with their equipment, and other arms and ammunition needed to supply the guerillas already in the Escambray), and land them at Trinidad’s port at Casilda. The port had a 12 meter depth, and roll-on roll-off capability at its dock, making it easy to unload the Brigade’s cargo for transport into the Escambray by truck. A week after his Inauguration (on Saturday, January 28th), President Kennedy was given a full briefing on the forthcoming Trinidad operation. It had to be scheduled for April, a little over two months later, so it could occur prior to rainy weather — and the arrival of more Soviet military equipment, as well as some MIG jet fighters with Cuban pilots trained by the Czechs. The MIGs might preclude any invasion at all. As he told Eisenhower, Kennedy staffed his go/no go decision on PLUTO/Trinidad and finally overruled the plan on March 15. Running out of time, only three days later the CIA came back with a new location at the Bay of Pigs. This time it was quickly approved by Kennedy. The new plan was named after the Zapata peninsula — just off the Bay of Pigs. Bay of Pigs deep inlet on left (Bahia de Cochinos) Trinidad on far right Two problems were readily apparent. The Bay of Pigs is only a little over 100 miles from Havana, twice as close as Trinidad, and 100 miles of bad road farther from the refuge of the Escambray mountains. That meant in case of difficulty, Brigade 2506 hadn’t a prayer of making it to the Escambray mountains. Even if successfully landed, it would have no choice but to try to overthro In a shocking move that signaled its full support for stopping President Trump from running in 2024, Fox News published an opinion piece by Democrat lawyer Bradley Moss which claimed the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was legal and justified. Bradley Moss is an infamous Democrat troll who has publicly supported the false claims of national security “experts†about Russiagate, and other anti-Trump hoaxes, for several years. Publishing an op-ed by Bradley Moss on the Mar-a-Lago raid is like promoting a book on marital fidelity by Hugh Hefner or asking Harvey Weinstein for tips on dating — it’s such an absurd idea that it reeks of bad faith. It’s the strongest possible sign yet that Fox News will try to stop President Trump’s 2024 run by any means necessary. Meanwhile, Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham appeared on Lisa Boothe’s podcast this week to say that: “People conflate Trump with people’s overall sense of happiness in the country. Donald Trump’s been a friend of mine for 25 years, and I’m always very open about this on my show. But, you know we’ll see whether that’s what the country wants. The country I think is so exhausted. They’re exhausted by the battle, the constant battle, that they may believe that, well, maybe it’s time to turn the page if we can get someone who has all Trump’s policies, who’s not Trump.†Last week, the passive-aggressive cookbook guru Steve Doocy announced on Fox & Friends that Trump needed to “tamp down the rhetoric†because he was being too mean to the Justice Department and the FBI after the raid on his mansion. This week, Doocy displayed his immense ignorance once again by telling the world that he was totally unaware that past presidents lawfully retain classified documents all the time. 
In fact, Steve Doocy has felt liberated recently to be the liberal Democrat that he has always been in real life. Curiously, Steve Doocy wants his audience to understand that he will never stop protecting the image of the FBI and he will never stop praising the integrity of the FBI — it makes you almost wonder if he basically works for the FBI. 
And let’s not forget that — just last month! — Fox News’ gasbag-in-chief Bret Baier tried his best to make GOP voters “dump Trump†over the January 6th Unselect Committee show trial, and its parade of bogus “witnesses†with their unreliable “testimonies.†
Speaking of trash testimony — hello again to the currently unemployed guy who called Arizona early for Biden at Fox News, Chris Stirewalt! 
Where does Fox News find all these useful idiots? The covert policy at Fox News for many years has been to hire Democrats on the news division side until they blow themselves up publicly with their barely-contained anti-conservative bias. This policy explains their rotating White House correspondent problem: Major Garrett to John Roberts to Kristin Fisher to Jacqui Heinrich. Major Garrett is currently hawking a dumb book that says the 2020 election was the most secure election in history. Seriously. He’s a Democrat. Kristin Fisher moved to CNN. She’s a Democrat. John Roberts is Canadian, and he used to work at CNN. He’s a Democrat. As for current hire Jacqui Heinrcih — who is she kidding? Based on his latest stunts, Steve Doocy has now “Very soon, there will be hundreds of health officials saying, “It was your choice. No one made you take it.†— Dr. Robert Malone In case you missed it, the pro-vaccine frauds at Fox News are trying to pivot away from pushing the experimental Big Pharma shots day and night for two years — it’s almost like the Pfizer and Moderna advertising dollars have suddenly dried up! Watch Sean Hannity attempt to walk back his years-long role as America’s dumbest Pfizer salesman. Perhaps he can hear the lawsuits coming. Hannity didn't tell anyone to get vaccinated? Hannity told everyone to get vaccinated — and he told them practically every night for a year. “And it absolutely makes sense for many Americans to get vaccinated. I believe in science, I believe in the science of vaccination.†— Sean Hannity, July 2021 I mean: who are we kidding? Why is Hannity trying to gaslight his own audience in 2022? He must know that bamboozling them about the shots will carry an enormous price tag — and it’s a bill that he’s not willing to pay. Let’s not forget: Hannity and the rest of the Big Pharma pimps at Fox News also relied on the very fat and very stupid Dr. Marc Siegel as their “medical expert†to push the shots in every time slot for the last two years. 
The pathetic Neil Cavuto was also dispensing bad medical advice on a daily basis on Fox News — even becoming semi-hysterical about therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine while always thanking the Big Pharma shots for their miraculous power.
Who can forget the fully vaccinated Cavuto announcing that he caught COVID, and still thanking the vaccines for working? The brainwashed anchor went on to say: “Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is helping people worldwide. Stop the deaths, stop the suffering, please get vaccinated, please.†Cavuto’s extraordinary rant is, of course, a prime example of magical thinking. As I discussed back in March, most corporate news outlets in America were paid by the Biden regime’s HHS to push the vaccines to their audiences without disclosing it — and that list includes Fox News. That’s the largest and most comprehensive breach of journalistic ethics that has ever occurred. Almost every corporate media outlet took the money. Almost every corporate media outlet lied about the vaccines (knowingly or unknowingly). Almost every corporate media outlet refused to report anything negative about the vaccines — because they were paid to close their eyes. Almost every corporate media outlet is implicated. The real pivot away from the Big Pharma shots at Fox News probably started on August 16th, 2022 when Fox News anchor Brian Kilmeade interviewed prominent Substack author (and former Democrat Party donor) Steve Kirsch about the vaccines. Now ask yourself: how is it possible that Fox News is just now reporting on vaccine injuries in August of 2022? 
Here’s Steve Kirsch also explaining to you why Fox News can’t verify his vaccine injury numbers: “Fox was not interested in verifying it. They said they ‘can’t.’ They aren’t kidding. It’s probably due to their advertising co
Here’s the only interview with the press that Dr. Fauci didn’t want to do in 2021 — and the only one that has been disappeared from social media. 
I wonder why? No doubt America’s own Angel of Death was too busy funding the torture of puppies — by locking their heads inside cages filled with hungry sandflies — to chat with me. via Emerald Robinson This one-hour section from the Summit of Truth is well worth your time — if you care about our elections. It’s called “The Trial of the Machines.†It explains what are called “Cast Vote Records†and why these records are the clearest indicators of machine-based election fraud. Mike Lindell interviewed cyber experts Jeff O’Donnell and Walter Daugherity to discuss these records. (Click on the image to view.) You learn that a Pima County (AZ) whistleblower attended a meeting of Democrats in September 2021 where each of them was promised an extra 35,000 votes. The whistleblower sent an email explaining this cheating to the FBI. You learn that Utah — which does all mail-in voting — refuses to turn over any of its Cast Vote Records. You learn that Texas refused to turn over any of its Cast Vote Records — until AG Ken Paxton forced them to do so. You learn that Edison Research — the company that reports the vote counts for American elections to the media — reported impossible and absurd numbers in the 2020 election! 
How To Get Your County’s Cast Vote RecordsThe Cast Vote Records are the clearest indicators of whether or not there is machine-based election fraud. On September 3, 2022, federal protections for these records under Title 52 Section 20701 comes to an end allowing the legal destruction of these records. Don’t let these records disappear from the public conscience. Here’s how you can request your county’s records. Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Don’t miss the extraordinary story of how the corporate media smeared Trump White House staff secretary Rob Porter in this Daily Wire exclusive by Ashe Schow. Steve Kirsch has compiled 100 data points to prove that the “safe and effective†COVID vaccines have failed. It’s a must-read. Share it with everyone you know! The heroic Dr. Robert Malone’s latest Substack article is something like the “unified field theory†of how the COVID medical tyranny has overthrown the West. Why are young and healthy Canadian doctors dying suddenly? Jessica Rose was just permanently banned from Twitter for sharing the truth about the shots. CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell was just the latest journalist to make a fool of herself by repeating the exact words that an unnamed DOJ official told her without verifying the information independently. This time, the factual matter under dispute was the exact whereabouts of President Trump’s three passports after the FBI raided his Florida mansion. The Deep State wanted ordinary Americans to know yesterday — off the record of course! — that the FBI didn’t take Donald Trump’s passports. How dare the 45th President of the United States suggest such a thing! To have the audacity to accuse our finest law enforcement officers of stealing his stuff, Norah wanted you to know, was just another low in the career of Orange Man Bad. Except, of course, Trump was right. The FBI had stolen his passports during the raid on Mar-a-Lago. Trump’s attorneys even released an email from the FBI telling them when his passports could be picked up! To make matters worse: the passports were missing on the FBI’s property receipt of items seized (whoops), and the warrant didn’t allow the FBI to take them anyway (whoops again), and the federal government had failed to get a special court order to seize his passports too (triple whoops). When President Trump said that the FBI stole his passports, he was being technically (and ethically and legally) correct. It turns out that the DOJ official that CBS News had trusted to tell the truth was not — like countless other DOJ officials and FBI officials and CIA officials and other assorted other national security state bureaucrats during the Trump years — telling the truth. Like so many other media personalities in the last few years, O’Donnell had humiliated herself by doing exactly what federal law enforcement officials in the Banana Republic of Biden wanted her to do: spread misinformation. Norah O’Donnell’s Twitter account was not suspended, of course, for spreading misinformation. Far from it! Her career as a pseudo-journalist will continue on at CBS News because she has willingly played her part in the greater cause of “getting Trump†before the 2024 election. In fact, the chances that Norah O’Donnell will win some bogus news journalism award (named after an octogenarian Democrat donor no doubt) have actually increased — which tells you everything you need to know about corporate journalism in America today. Those who parrot the falsehoods of government officials in Biden’s Banana Republic are rewarded handsomely. There are laurels for every liar. Meanwhile, a much more important journalist named Paul Sperry — who works as an investigative reporter for Real Clear Politics — suffered a very different fate. He found himself permanently suspended on Twitter for sharing information from anonymous sources just like Norah O’Donnell. Notice the difference. Paul Sperry has spent his time following the Durham investigation — which is too close for comfort for the corrupt figures in charge of the Biden regime. The FBI is probably not a fan of his reporting either — so he’s been banned. In case you’re wondering whether you still live in America, just consider this: the corporate news had no problem with picking disgraced FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strozk to defend the integrity of the FBI. Now remember: the folks over at MSNBC could have picked anyone to publicly defend the FBI’s credibility. They chose Peter Strozk. 
That’s like picking Ike Turner as your marriage counselor, or Hunter Biden as your spiritual advisor, or Bill Clinton as a babysitter for teenage girls. It’s a failure of judgment that’s so spectacular and obvious that it must be deliberate. In other words, MSNBC is telling you that the Democrat wing of the |
   
Emerald RobinsonReports on DC swamp from Emerald Robinson. No longer censored by the 'right' establishment. Archives
February 2026
Categories
|
RSS Feed
