Thanks for making THE RIGHT WAY the #1 newsletter for the red-pilled.
Get 15% off today to help me share the absolute truth!
Here’s the 13th article in our new section on international military affairs: NatSec Guy.
The United States’ counter-blockade of Iran in the Strait of Hormuz is not a strategy. It is a symptom of a presidency trapped in an escalation spiral with no clear exit.
At its core, the move is meant to squeeze Iran economically. But in reality, the true targets are far broader: China and Europe, both of which are deeply reliant on global energy flows disrupted by this policy.
The problem? This gambit reveals a president boxed into an impossible corner.
Before the counter-blockade, the administration faced two bad choices: abandon the war and risk handing Iran a symbolic victory — or escalate further with a direct invasion that could spiral into a catastrophic quagmire, even a nuclear confrontation. The blockade, then, is not a solution.
It is a third, equally flawed option.
Worse still, it is unlikely to achieve any of its stated goals. Iran only needs to survive to claim victory — and it can. China, meanwhile, is far less vulnerable than Washington assumes. The broader global system is already adjusting in ways that disadvantage the United States.
via Emerald Robinson
RSS Feed
