The U.S. military budget is the largest in the world, and by a wide margin. The Biden administration recently submitted a defense budget of $773 billion for fiscal 2023 - which is more than the combined budgets of the next 10 highest-spending countries combined.

While the size of the defense budget, and exactly how and where all that money should be spent, will be an enduring source of political controversy, the defense spending is a boon for local economies across the United States.

According to a recent report, the Department of Defense spent $593.9 billion on contracting and personnel in the 50 states and D.C. in fiscal 2020. This money went to defense contractors that manufacture aircraft, ships, and weapons, in addition to service providers, research and development, as well as wages for active-duty service members, civilians, and reservists.

This spending, of course, is not spread evenly, and states that are home to large military bases and contractor operations receive more funds than states where the military and defense industry have a smaller footprint.

The DoD spent a reported $6.6 billion in Oklahoma in fiscal 2020, or about 1.1% of its total domestic spending, the 24th highest share among the 50 states. Of that money, payroll accounted for about 48% while about 52% went to contractors.

The overall economic impact of defense spending in the state is higher than average, as annual military spending is equal to about 3.5% of Oklahoma's overall GDP, compared to the 2.8% national average. On a per capita basis, defense spending in Oklahoma is equal to about $1,664 per person, the 18th most among states.

All data in this story is from the Department of Defense report Defense Spending By State Fiscal Year 2020.

RankStateTotal defense spending, FY 2020 ($B)Defense spending as a share of GDP (%)Defense spending per capita ($)1Texas834.62,8282Virginia64.311.37,4813California611.91,5504Maryland30.475,0235Florida29.12.61,3386Connecticut23.68.26,6467Arizona20.25.32,7238Massachusetts18.63.12,7009Pennsylvania17.82.21,39110Georgia15.82.51,47211Missouri154.52,43712Alabama14.86.43,01113Washington14.62.31,90014North Carolina14.42.41,35415New York12.80.766216Kentucky12.65.82,80417Colorado11.62.91,99217Ohio11.61.799219Illinois9.31.174220New Jersey8.41.394821Hawaii7.78.55,50621Mississippi7.76.52,60723District of Columbia7.65.210,69024Michigan6.81.368525Oklahoma6.63.51,66426South Carolina6.12.51,17727Wisconsin5.51.694228Indiana5.41.480228Utah5.42.61,65330Louisiana4.31.792731New Mexico3.63.51,70732Maine3.55.22,62633Kansas3.41.91,17533Tennessee3.40.949735Alaska3.36.44,57736Nevada3.11.797637New Hampshire33.42,19738Iowa2.91.491338Minnesota2.90.751140Nebraska1.81.494941Arkansas1.61.253141Oregon1.60.638441Rhode Island1.62.61,51944West Virginia11.458845North Dakota0.91.71,24046Delaware0.70.865946Idaho0.70.837946Montana0.71.365546South Dakota0.71.275046Vermont0.72.11,13351Wyoming0.51.2784

(The Center Square) - The Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals set the execution dates for six men on death row, including one that some lawmakers say is innocent.

The six men were among other death row inmates that challenged the constitutionality of the state's lethal injection protocol. U.S. District Court Judge Stephen P. Friot ruled against the men on June 6. District Attorney John O'Connor asked the appeals court to set execution dates for death row inmates that have exhausted their appeals," the court said in its ruling.

The Court set the execution date for James Allen Coddington first "because his March 10, 2022 execution date was stayed by federal court after Coddington was allowed to rejoin the lethal injection lawsuit. He is scheduled to be executed on Aug. 25 for the 1997 murder of Albert Hale.

Richard Glossip, who was convicted of murder in the connection with the 1997 murder of hotel owner Barry Van Treese, has an execution date of Sept. 22. His case has drawn national attention because Glossip is not accused of being the one that killed Van Trees. He is accused of hiring Justin Sneed to commit the murder.

Sneed was given a life sentence for his testimony against Glossip.

Reps. Kevin McDugle, R-Broken Arrow, and Justin Humphrey, R-Lane, held a news conference last month saying they believe Glossip is innocent based on a 343-page report from the Reed Smith law firm.

Humphrey said he and McDugle support the death penalty "but if innocent men are put to death without being offered a fresh, properly-conducted trial at which all available evidence is presented for jurors to assess, our system of law and order will inevitably come under attack leaving us all less safe."

The other four men scheduled for execution:

Benjamin Robert Cole, Sr. who was convicted of murdering his infant daughter in 2002. He execution date is Oct. 20Richard Fairchild is scheduled to be executed on Nov. 17. He was convicted of killing a 3-year-old boy in 1993. John Fitzgerald Hanson was convicted for killing a 77-year-old in 1999. His execution date is Dec. 15. Scott Eizember is scheduled to be executive on Jan. 12, 2023. He was convicted for killing an elderly couple in 2003

O'Connor said in a statement that some of the families waited years for justice.

"Oklahomans overwhelmingly voted in 2016 to preserve the death penalty as a consequence for the most heinous murders," O'Connor said. "I’m certain that justice and safety for all of us drove that vote."

(The Center Square) - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Oklahoma has jurisdiction to prosecute non-Native Americans who commit crimes on tribal lands.

The vote was 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. siding with the majority.

The ruling is a blow to the McGirt decision handed down in 2020. In that case, the court ruled that states and local governments have no jurisdiction to prosecute crimes on tribal lands per agreements between the tribes and the federal government made years ago. The federal government has the sole prosecuting authority, according to the ruling.

The current case involved Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta, a non-Native American convicted of child neglect involving his stepdaughter, who is a member of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, according to court records. His case was tossed out after a lower court said the state did not have jurisdiction because the alleged crime happened on tribal land.

"A state prosecution of a non-Indian likewise would not harm the federal interest in protecting Indian victims," wrote Justice Kavanaugh in the majority opinion. "State prosecution would supplement federal authority, not supplant federal authority."'

The McGirt ruling also presented challenges for the federal government, the majority said.

"The Oklahoma courts have reversed numerous state convictions on that same jurisdictional ground," Kavanaugh wrote. "After having their state convictions reversed, some non-Indian criminals have received lighter sentences in plea deals negotiated with the Federal Government. Others have simply gone free. Going forward, the State estimates that it will have to transfer prosecutorial responsibility for more than 18,000 cases per year to the Federal and Tribal Governments."

Justice Neil Gorsuch sided with Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan and wrote the dissenting opinion.

He cited an 1831 case in which a white missionary was arrested in Georgia for preaching on tribal lands. Gorsuch called the arrest a "power play" by Georgia officials that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to support it.

"Where our predecessors refused to participate in one state's unlawful power grab at the expense of the Cherokee, today's Court accedes to another's," Gorsuch said.

Gov. Kevin Stitt said he was "heartened" by the ruling.

"Since the Court's 2020 McGirt decision, federal prosecutors have declined thousands of cases like Castro-Huerta, a non-Native who monstrously abused his 5-year-old Native stepdaughter," Stitt said in a statement. "Justice has been delayed and denied to thousands of Native victims in our state for no reason other than their race."

Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. said in a statement, "the Court failed in its duty to honor this nation's promises, defied Congress' statutes, and accepted the lawless disregard of the Cherokee's sovereignty."

The McGirt decision stood "despite the Oklahoma governor's lies and attacks," he said.

"As we enter a chapter of concurrent jurisdiction, tribes will continue to seek partnership and collaboration with state authorities while expanding our own justice systems," Hoskin said. "We hope that with these legal questions behind us, Governor Stitt will finally lay his anti-tribal agenda to rest and come to the table to move forward with us – for the sake of Oklahomans and public safety."

(The Center Square) - Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt won the Republican nomination for a second term as governor, defeating three other candidates without a runoff, according to unofficial election results.

Stitt took 69% of the vote in Tuesday's primary election. He will face State Superintendent of Instruction Joy Hofmeister, who switched from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party, Libertarian Natalie Bruno and independent Ervin Yen in November.

Hofmeister won 60% of the vote in her contest against Connie Johnson.

Attorney General John O'Connor lost his bid for a four-year term to Gentner Drummond in a close race. Drummond took 50.9% of the vote, while O'Connor garnered 49.12%. O'Connor was appointed to the post by Stitt after Mike Hunter stepped down. No Democrat ran for the seat. Drummond will face Libertarian Lynda Steele in November.

In congressional races, U.S. Rep. Markwayne Mullin and T.W. Shannon are headed to an Aug. 23 runoff to determine who will be the Republican nominee in the race to succeed retiring U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe. The winner of that race will face Democrat Kendra Horn in November.

U.S. Senator James Lankford held off two opponents to advance to the November general election, garnering more than 67% of the votes. Two Democrats are headed to a runoff to determine who will challenge the incumbent. Madison Horn led the pack of six candidates with more than 37% of the vote. She will face Jason Bollinger in the Aug. 23 runoff.

Interest rates on mortgage loans are rising rapidly in the United States. As the Federal Reserve pursues an aggressive strategy of rate hikes to curb inflation, homebuyers are increasingly saddled with higher borrowing costs.

The national average 30-year fixed mortgage rate is now approaching 6%, up from just 3.79% in January. The rate increase could mean tens of thousands of dollars more in interest payments for new homebuyers this year.

A recent report published by loan platform LendingTree reviewed home sale and mortgage data to quantify the effect rising mortgage rates could have on homebuyers.

In Oklahoma, the average APR - annual percentage rate - on a mortgage rose from 3.84% in January to 5.36% in April. This increase means that a homebuyer who took out a mortgage in April will pay about $216 more per month in interest than one who took out a mortgage in January, based on the average mortgage amount of $237,849 across Oklahoma.

Accounting for both average home values and mortgage rates, the increase in interest rates from January to April for the typical homebuyer in Oklahoma will add up to $2,591 more in the first year alone and $77,722 over the lifetime of the 30-year mortgage - the 11th smallest increase among states.

All data in this story is from the report Rising Mortgage Rates Could Cost Some Homebuyers More Than $100,000 Over Lifetime of Loans from LendingTree.

RankStateExtra amount paid over 30-year lifetime of mortgage ($)Average APR, January 2022 (%)Average APR, April 2022 (%)Average mortgage amount, 2022 ($)1California$146,4413.705.09493,5782Washington$128,6593.765.11447,4003Massachusetts$121,4043.695.10407,5324Colorado$119,1653.725.18382,5715New Jersey$117,0293.625.08379,9146Utah$117,0013.685.16369,8117New York$111,1713.685.17351,1698Oregon$105,2213.765.20343,1159Hawaii$104,2253.734.88427,90110Virginia$102,4783.815.18352,10511Idaho$102,2153.765.26319,04612Arizona$101,3993.915.32333,63613Delaware$101,2313.695.18320,53314Maryland$101,0753.775.15342,35515Montana$100,3963.605.11313,33616Nevada$100,1353.855.23339,42217Alaska$99,1923.585.05317,57518Florida$96,3973.765.25303,88419Maine$95,6713.785.38278,69420New Hampshire$94,8563.825.22316,93921Vermont$94,6363.735.39266,04522Rhode Island$94,5143.695.12310,59023North Carolina$94,0473.765.21304,23924Connecticut$94,0203.735.13314,56525Illinois$92,8283.785.23298,44126Texas$92,0113.805.21306,21727Georgia$89,8523.845.24299,99228Pennsylvania$88,5603.805.31273,63429New Mexico$87,9673.875.44260,30930Minnesota$87,9383.775.22283,88531South Dakota$86,7483.535.12257,30132North Dakota$86,3173.745.30257,71833Nebraska$85,9393.745.29259,50334Louisiana$84,8953.855.39256,15035Wyoming$83,8733.855.22284,98936Tennessee$82,7933.965.35275,81537Kansas$82,2953.845.30261,98838South Carolina$78,6803.915.29264,71639Alabama$77,8303.915.40242,17540Oklahoma$77,7223.845.36237,84941Indiana$77,2833.905.42236,70142Mississippi$76,5243.885.39235,12343Michigan$76,1063.875.32244,03944Arkansas$75,9143.815.25246,67245Iowa$74,8743.845.34233,61846Wisconsin$74,8133.895.34240,72947Missouri$72,9393.995.46229,61548Kentucky$72,8203.915.41224,56249West Virginia$72,2923.865.47207,30050Ohio$71,8373.945.33241,517

(The Center Square) - Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company has lowered its request for a rate hike, but some customers are still concerned.

The utility company's new proposal will raise the bill for the average residential customer by just under $3 a month, according to Donald Rowlett, director of regulatory policy and compliance for OG&E. The original proposal would have raised the average residential customer's bill by just under $10 a month.

The last time OG&E raised its rates was September 2019, Rowlett said.

The lower rates came after negotiation with several parties, including Walmart, the Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives and the Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma, OG&E said during the Oklahoma Corporation Commission meeting Monday. It is now seeking to increase its total revenue by $45 million, instead of $163.5 million, a nearly $119 million decrease from its original proposal.

"There was great thoughtfulness in arriving at the $45 million change," said Rowlett. "While it's not zero, it is significantly less than what the company proposed and, at 2.3%, it is much lower than the increases that are being experienced in other parts of the economy."

Dropping OG&E's proposed revenue increase from $163.5 to $45 million represented an overall decrease of 73% from the company's original proposal for rate hikes.

Rowlett said the increase would still be "significantly below" the current average rate of inflation.

"I believe the settlement is in the public interest. It's a significant change from what the company originally proposed," he said

Some customers spoke against the proposed rate increases during public comment, including Reverend Tim Luschen, who pastors a church in Oklahoma City.

"Looking back now we can see that in this last year that we are already $6,000 over on our utility budget," said Luschen.

He said large utility bills that have been difficult to anticipate led the church to pull resources from other areas to cover the payments.

"We have a clinic, we have a food pantry, we do all kinds of other social ministry, but this cuts back on our ability to do the ministry that we find that is essential for our church," Luschen said. "I don't believe that this is a good time considering that OG&E is still able to pay their stockholders' dividends and to still compensate their management and executives at a generous rate. This is not a good time as we're coming out of COVID to ask for the ratepayers to pay any additional cost that will impact their lives."

Monday's meeting was heard before an administrative law judge. No action was taken.

(The Center Square) - Three drug companies reached a $250 million settlement with Oklahoma related to the opioid crisis, Attorney General John O'Connor said in a news release Monday.

The settlement with McKesson, Cardinal, and AmerisourceBergen comes after the state rejected a national settlement.

The three lawsuits were first filed in 2020 by former attorney general Mike Hunter and accused the drug companies of fueling the opioid crisis for one reason – greed.

"Defendant substantially contributed to fueling the opioid crisis by supplying massive and patently unreasonable quantities of opioids to communities throughout the United States, including Oklahoma," the lawsuit against McKesson said. "Defendant ignored its duties and responsibilities to prevent oversupply and diversion of opioids for illicit and non-medical uses."

Similar wording was in the lawsuits against Cardinal and AmerisourceBergen.

Cities and counties will share the money and must agree to the terms of the settlement before it is final, according to the news release. The money will go to the "areas that need help the most."

"Many Oklahoma families have been ravaged and lives have been lost by opioid addictions and overdoses," O'Connor said in a statement. "Money cannot possibly heal those wounds or bring back our loved ones. The funds we are recovering will be used to prevent and treat addictions to opioids."

The drug companies will pay the state's attorney's fees, O'Connor said. Attorneys hired by the state and the cities and counties includes in the lawsuit also agreed to reduce their fees, according to the news release.

Oklahoma has received more than $680 million in settlements related to the opioid crisis, according to the release. That number does not include attorney's fees and court costs.

The announcement comes a day before O'Connor's bid for reelection in the Republican primary. He is facing Gentner Drummond.

(The Center Square) - Oklahomans are going to the polls to decide who will be on the ballot in several key races, including governor and U.S Senator.

Early voting began Thursday and polls are open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Tuesday.

Candidates must receive 50% of the vote plus one to avoid a runoff.

Voters will choose between 13 Republicans who are hoping to replace outgoing U.S. Sen. James Inhofe.

Inhofe announced in February that he would retire from his post at the end of the year, setting up a special election to fill the remainder of his term that ends in 2027.

The Republican senator endorsed his chief of staff, Luke Holland, to succeed him. Also on the ballot is U.S. Rep. Markwayne Mullin, just the second Republican to represent the state's 2nd Congressional District since 1923.

State Sen. Nathan Dahm, former state Rep. T.W. Shannon, Scott Pruitt, who served as administrator for the Environmental Protection Administration under President Donald Trump, are on the ballot. Alex Gray, deputy director of the Office of Trade & Manufacturing Policy under Trump, is also on the ballot

Rounding out the list of candidates are Adam Holley, Jessica Jean Garrison, Laura Moreno, Michael Coibion, Paul Royse, John F. Tompkins and Randy J. Grellner.

No Democrats qualified for the post.

U.S. Sen. James Lankford is also facing two Republican challengers in his quest for another term. Jackson Lahmeyer, an Owasso pastor and Joan Farr, who ran as an independent in 2020, have also qualified. The winner of the primary election will have a Democratic challenger. Arya Azma, Dennis Baker, Jason Bollinger, Jo Glenn, Madison Horn and Brandon Wade are vying for the Democratic nomination.

Gov. Kevin Stitt will face three Republican challengers in his bid for reelection, including one candidate from his administration. Joel Kintsel, the director of the state's Department of Veterans Affairs is running against his boss.

Kintsel describes himself as a "Ronald Reagan conservative" in a news release announcing his candidacy. He described the Stitt administration as "rife with corruption, self-dealing and cronyism and Oklahomans deserve another choice.”

Also challenging Stitt in the Republican primary is Mark Sherwood, a naturopathic doctor and former Tulsa police officer, and Moira McCabe

On the Democrat side, state school superintendent Joy Hofmeister, who ran for her position as a Republican, has switched parties. She and former state Sen. Connie Johnson are vying to run in the November primary.

Incumbent John O’Connor and Gentner Drummond are running in the Republican primary for attorney general of Oklahoma on June 28. Libertarian candidate Lynda Steele is running in the general election, but no Democratic candidate filed to run, meaning that the winner of the Republican primary will be heavily favored in November. Republicans have held the office of Oklahoma attorney general continuously since voters elected Scott Pruitt (R) to the position in 2010.

Ben Felder wrote in The Oklahoman that “One attorney general candidate is running on his close working relationship with the governor and his fidelity to the former president, while his challenger has presented himself as an independent who would serve as a check on state government power.”

Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) appointed O’Connor to the office on July 23, 2021, to succeed Mike Hunter (R). Hunter – who was elected in 2018 – resigned on June 1, 2021, after The Oklahoman inquired about whether he was having an extramarital affair.

O’Connor’s professional experience includes being a founding shareholder in the law firm of Newton, O’Connor, Turner & Ketchum, P.C. and working as an attorney at Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. President Donald Trump (R) nominated O’Connor for a federal judgeship in 2018 but his nomination was returned by the U.S. Senate before the conclusion of the 115th United States Congress, and he withdrew from consideration for re-nomination in 2019. During the campaign, O’Connor highlighted his efforts as state attorney general against some Biden administration policies, including joining lawsuits against vaccine and mask mandates.

Drummond ran for attorney general in 2018 and advanced from that year’s Republican primary with 38.5% of the vote to Hunter’s 44.5%. In the primary runoff, Hunter defeated Drummond by 273 votes, 50.05% to 49.95%. Drummond served as a pilot and instructor in the U.S. Air Force during the Gulf War. His professional experience includes owning The Drummond Law Firm and serving as a principal shareholder and director of Blue Sky Bank. Drummond said on his campaign website that “As attorney general, he will defend our rights, uphold the rule of law, and serve the people of Oklahoma, not the political elite.”

Both candidates criticized the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma but differed on how the state should proceed. In July 2020, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to reverse a decision by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals and ruled that under the Indian Major Crimes Act, lands reserved for the Creek Nation in eastern Oklahoma constituted Indian Country and that the state of Oklahoma could not legally try a Creek citizen for criminal conduct in state court. It confirmed that a large portion of eastern Oklahoma are Indian reservations and not under the state’s law enforcement jurisdiction.

Drummond said he would work with the tribes in that area to develop a solution to jurisdictional issues. At a campaign forum, Drummond said, “The Supreme Court has ruled. That was two years ago. For two years we have not had a solution in the state of Oklahoma. … What must be resolved right now is a collaboration with the Native American tribes. O’Connor said that he has met with leaders from four of the six main tribes in the area and would still continue to pursue legal action on cases related to tribal jurisdictional matters. He also said, “Job number one is to protect the sovereignty of the state of Oklahoma.”

A June 2022 poll of 400 likely Republican primary voters by Amber Integrated found Drummond leading O’Connor, 41% to 28%, with 30% undecided. The margin of error was +/- 4.9 percentage points. A poll of 455 likely Republican primary voters also conducted by Amber Integrated in March showed Drummond with 37% support, O’Connor with 16%, and 47% undecided. The margin of error of that poll was +/- 4.6 percentage points.

(The Center Square) - Oklahoma leaders praised the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which comes months after state lawmakers passed some of the most stringent abortion laws in the country.

The case in question began with a legal challenge to a Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks. Last year, Mississippi Attorney Lynn Fitch requested that the Supreme Court use that case to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The court ruled 6-3 that there is no constitutional right to abortion and said it’s up to states to decide how to handle the issue.

Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 612 during the 2022 legislative session. The bill makes it a felony to perform an abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger during a medical emergency. Anyone who violates the law faces a prison term of up to 10 years and a fine of up to $100,000. The bill will not make the woman criminally liable.

Lawmakers also passed House Bill 4327, which will hold abortion providers liable except in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother’s life.

“Abortion is a state’s rights issue and it belongs to the people,” said Gov. Kevin Stitt in a statement on Friday. “I promised Oklahomans I would sign every pro-life bill that came across my desk and I am proud to have kept that promise, especially today as Oklahoma now has trigger laws to ban abortion in our state.

House Speaker Charles McCall, R-Atoka, said in a statement Friday the ruling makes Oklahoma one of the most pro-life states.

‘Decades of steadfast prayer and unwavering legislative efforts to protect the lives of the unborn have finally prevailed,” McCall said. “Overturning Roe v. Wade justifies the long battle by Oklahoma House Republicans and pro-life allies nationwide to return this matter to the duly elected representatives of state legislatures to decide.”

O’Connor said it was a “day for celebration and thanksgiving.”

“Roe not only took away over 60 million lives, it also barred Oklahomans and all other Americans from protecting our unborn children,” O’Connor said in a statement. “We should help every woman facing a crisis pregnancy, but not at the cost of the innocent child’s life.”