The recent Tennessee Winery case which went to the Federal Supreme Court is already contradicting multiple mandates in SQ811. Interstate Commerce rights in the US Constitution do not allow a state to ban people from commerce during a waiting period of years after establishing residency. While this flaw does not kill the whole amendment, it demonstrates that the effort lacked proper research and broad input.
Here's what else we saw:
Leading Oklahoma Cannabis Industry attorney, Ronald Durbin, posted a cursory video review of the filed document and gave both a scathing and complimentary reaction to the document.
His statements seem to say that this could be pulled and refiled into an excellent statutory initiative petition. We embedded his video in the column to the right. |
|
The embedded frame to the right consists of the document filed at the Secretary of state's office.
You can scroll through the document and follow the comments of Attorney Ron Durbin, while he details the flaws and fixes that SQ811 contains. |
|