After a long three months or so, Top G Andrew Tate has been released to house arrest from a jail in Bucharest. As a refresher, Tate and his brother, as well as two Romanian women, were arrested back in December on suspicion of human trafficking, rape, and crime gang offenses.

Tate has maintained his innocence the entire time, updating his Twitter audience while apparently in solitary confinement. I wasn't aware they allowed you to have your phone in solitary, but I guess that's how they do it in the modern age.

\u201cBREAKING: Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan released from jail and put under house arrest, spokesperson says\n\nRead more here: https://t.co/f1r09dQAgW\n\n\ud83d\udcfa Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube\u201d

— Sky News (@Sky News) 1680288697

Earlier this month, the four appeared at a bail hearing and their bail applications were rejected. However, they appealed the decision, and the appeals court overturned it today. All four will be placed under house arrest as the investigation continues. None have been formally charged yet.

Just before the news broke, Tate tweeted, "In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."

\u201c\u201cIn the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, \n\nbut the silence of our friends.\u201d\u201d

— Andrew Tate (@Andrew Tate) 1680263119

Back in February, wiretaps that purportedly proved Tate and his brother were framed began circulating on social media. According to the alleged wiretaps, the women who accused Tate planned on setting him and his brother up by pretending to be in love with them, and planned to play dumb if they were caught in a police raid.

\u201c\u201cIt means the boys are going to be freed\u201d: Twitter erupts as Andrew Tate framed claim emerges amid wiretap leaks https://t.co/IyNVHKpPFM\u201d

— SK POP (@SK POP) 1676484244

Whether Tate and his brother were framed for this specific allegation remains to be seen. Regardless, it does seem that Tate was running some type of brothel in Romania. His own website used to describe his business model, which is...questionable, to say the least.

"I've been running a webcam studio for nearly a decade, I've had over 75 girls work for me, and my business model is different than 99% of webcam studio owners. Over 50% of my employees were actually my girlfriend at the time and, of all my girlfriends, NONE were in the adult entertainment industry before they met me."

"Literally, that was my job. My job was to meet a girl, go on a few dates, sleep with her, test if she's quality, get her to fall in love with me to where she'd do anything I say, and then get her on webcam so we could become rich together."

\u201cAndrew Tate\u2019s website was straight up just like \u201cWhy am I an expert in this? Because I am a successful sex trafficker\u201d\u201d

— worms cited (@worms cited) 1672378588

Now, I'm no legal expert but that sounds...bad. I guess we'll just have to wait and let the courts decide if the Top G will be freed permanently.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 04:48PM - Lily Hayes
Andrew Tate and his brother get released to house arrest after spending months in a Romanian jail
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

There's another insurrection going on at the Florida State Capital in Tallahassee. But something tells me this one won't result in hundreds of arrests, years-long prison sentences, and solitary confinement. Because this insurrection was in the name of trans rights, which no one is allowed to portray even the slightest bit negatively, ever. For reasons.

This latest insurrection comes the same week a transgender person killed six people at a Christian elementary school. Now, I know what you're thinking, what exactly are they upset about? And they weren't protesting for gun control or school safety, which would have made slightly more sense. They were protesting a bill passed by state lawmakers that bans teachers from teaching radical gender ideology to students in grades Pre-K to 8. Which seems reasonable to me. But then again, what do I know. I'm just a "cisgender" white girl with a laptop.

Some of them chanted, "Whose schools? Our schools!" Other insurrectionists held signs that said, "Cure Transphobia" and "Stop Trans Genocide".

\u201cAnother Insurrection by Trans Activists today in Florida. \n\nActivists stormed the state capital demanding Trans Rights! \n\nAgain, no sympathy or care for the mass shooting that just took place carried out by a member of their own community! \n\n\u201d

— Oli London (@Oli London) 1680286442

\u201cRadical Trans Activists Scream inside the Florida State Capital holding placards with \u2018Cure Transphobia\u2019 and \u2018Stop Trans Genocide\u2019 \n\nThis comes just 4 days after a Transgender shooter took 6 innocent lives. \n\n\ud83d\udcf9 @FLVoiceNews #Trans #TransDayOfVengeance #Transgender\u201d

— Oli London (@Oli London) 1680286742

This confusing rhetoric and lack of sympathy for the shooting victims is coming from the White House, too. I guess today is Transgender Day of Visibility, so to provide more visibility to the transgender people, the White House issued a statement that claimed there is an "epidemic of violence against transgender women and girls, in particular women and girls of color". It also said "transgender Americans shape our nation's soul". Again, there was no mention of the shooting that happened just this past Monday.

\u201cBiden notably did not mention the mass murder carried out by a trans-identified person on Monday. \n\nhttps://t.co/65GedlYhDd\u201d

— The Post Millennial (@The Post Millennial) 1680236412

This is such an incredibly bizarre reaction to the tragic shooting, I don't even know where to begin. And the worst part is, there seems to be little if any sympathy for the families of the victims, which is where everyone's focus should be now.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 03:47PM - Lily Hayes
Watch: Days after a mass shooting, trans activists invade another state capitol in protest of "Anti-Woke Bill"
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Earlier this week, Riley Gaines spoke at the University of Pittsburgh. If you need a refresher, Gaines is the former NCAA swimmer for the University of Kentucky who competed against biological male Lia Thomas. Gaines and Thomas actually tied at the NCAA champs, but they decided to give the trophy to Thomas. Just cuz.

Gaines spoke about this experience at UPitt, and at one point, she asked an anthropologist about the difference in male and female bones.

"So if you were to dig up a human, two humans, in 100 years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?"

And this man sad, "no". Which we all know for a fact ain't true. That's why the crowd burst into laughter and chaos immediately after his answer.

\u201c.\u2066@Riley_Gaines_\u2069 to anthropologist: "If you were to dig up\u2026 2 humans\u2026 100 years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?"\n\n"No."\n\n*CHAOS*\n\n"I'm not sure why I'm being laughed at if I'm the expert in the room. ... I have a PhD!"\u201d

— Vince Coglianese (@Vince Coglianese) 1680182018

He then got very butt-hurt that he was being laughed at for denying a long-known scientific reality.

"I’m not sure why I’m being laughed at if I’m the expert in the room. Have any of you been to archaeological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data. I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at.”

Gaines tried to explain that she has done a lot of research into this topic and considered all viewpoints, but he cut her off, saying, "I have a Ph.D." Which of course resulted in more laughter.

I think what Gaines was trying to get at was, no matter how a person "identifies" during their lifetime, a scientist examining their body centuries later could determine if they were a male or female because of the undeniable biological differences. Men and women's skeletons differ in bone density, length, and structure - and all these things happen to benefit men in sports. Women's bodies, and specifically their bones/pelvis, are structured to prioritize child-bearing.

But what do I know? I don't have a Ph.D.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 03:05PM - Lily Hayes
Watch: Girls sports advocate Riley Gaines stumps scientist on basic biology, crowd laughs as he pulls 'Ph.D' card
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Welcome to Eugene, Oregon. Where an angry father is addressing a school board. Context is missing, but I can gather the school board knows of the alleged assignment that the father is at the meeting to address. He starts off by saying it's "not a rumor," which leads me to believe the board is attempting to claim the assignment never happened. Standard viral video disclaimers apply.

Now here is a father discussing how his high school daughter was given an assignment to declare her preference for anal vs oral sex.

"And my daughter specifically stated that the teacher up a wheel on the class board, and it stated anal penetration, oral sex, licking of ear, kissing. And he wanted them to write now the initials of a boy or girl they would do these activities with. Now, I don't know what's worse. Wanting to know my child's sexual fantasy? Or who they're going to do have anal penetration and oral sex with?"

I'd go with a little from column A and a little from column B.

Here's what I want to know. Because we can't say this is the first of these stories we've heard. There has been a teacher who made students read a story about nine-year-olds watching grown men masturbate. High school students were asked to grade how comfortable they were with anal sex. Kindergarten students -- KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS -- were assigned to draw a picture of where the best place in their home is to masturbate.

The resolution tends to be some version of the same: a suspension pending an investigation, plausible deniability by administrators, and the teacher not heard from unless it also involves a perp walk. What I want to know is what this teacher's (and his peers) excuse/rationale/thought process is.

Is it a simple case of sexual deviancy and needing to be 500 yards away from playgrounds at all times? Or in the teacher's twisted mind, do they think there is educational value in these assignments? I'd like to hear the teacher have to explain in front of parents why they assigned these assignments, what the goal was, and what ideology went into deciding these were appropriate assignments for school children.

Then they can be fired and kept 500 yards away from playgrounds.

><><><><><><

Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 12:26PM - Brodigan
Watch: Father obliterates school board over daughter's in-class assignment about who she would do...and in what orifice
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

LwC Senior Zoomer Culture Correspondent Lily Hayes hit on this earlier. Twitter has had the opportunity to do Community Notes things since then. And we at the LwC(dot)C love ourselves a good Community Notes as much as we hate Nancy Pelosi and think she is a wretched waste of chromosomes.

Here's where we left off:

Anyone who is not a nincompoop knows what is wrong with that tweet. And thanks to Community Notes, even the nincompoops reading Nancy's ignorant tweet will too: "Ms. Pelosi mistakenly says that Trump can prove his innocence at trial. Law in the US assumes the innocence of a defendant and the prosecution must prove guilt for a conviction."

With a link to Cornell Law School. Ironic, since Cornell students themselves also don't understand how the law works.

Innocent until proven guilty is basic civics. It's not Trump's job to prove his innocence. It's Alvin Bragg's job to prove Trump's guilt

I harken back to something Jon Stewart said this week. He lamented how old our elected officials are, and how everything is held together by a handful of staffers. Pelosi's staffers holding it together for her don't understand basic civics. The political communication professionals, all of who had to sign off on this talking point, also don't understand basic civics.

Or, none of them care about basic civics. And think that because they hate Trump and he's their political opponent, he doesn't deserve to be treated fairly.

That's fine. It's the new norm now. It's the new rules. New rules I'm going to look forward to having under a Republican administration. Not unlike when Harry Reid was warned when he eliminated the filibuster, leftists aren't going to like what happens next.

><><><><><><

Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 11:15AM - Brodigan
Nancy Pelosi gets fact-checked into oblivion over ignorant Trump indictment tweet
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

China is continuously realizing that a longstanding policy of female infanticide has less-than-favorable impacts on the population. And it has since taken actions to try and correct this - like encouraging college students to fall in love in the hopes that they'll help increase the birth rate.

\u201cCertain colleges in China are giving students time off to "enjoy love" as the country's birth rate has seen a steep decline in recent years.\nhttps://t.co/hvEWutty5P\u201d

— FOX Illinois (@FOX Illinois) 1680235201

Last week, the Sichuan Southwest Vocational College of Civil Aviation told its students and staff that a one-day holiday will be extended for a whole week. The official notice encourage them to "leave the classroom, leave campus, enjoy the nature and feel the beauty of spring and love." Another college in Xiamen also extended its break to a full week.

Students on Weibo aired their suspicions that this break wasn't tooootally about rest and relaxation, with one writing, "I'm sure this is just another attempt to push people into having more babies." And this isn't totally unfounded, since China has been desperately trying to encourage citizens to have more babies, particularly since more people died than were born in the country last year. China's birth rate for 2022 was its lowest ever at 6.77 births per 1000 people. For comparison, the United States's 2022 birth rate was 12.012 births per 1000 people.

Several local governments already offer extended maternity leave, financial subsidies, tax cuts or relaxed restrictions on acquiring property. And now it seems they're targeting education, with the city of Weifang announcing it will exempt high school fees for the third child of families.

Perhaps the best method adopted by several provinces is encouraging marriage with a recently instated 30 days paid marriage leave. This seems like a better idea than encouraging college kids to go crazy on a spring break, since children are much better off when their parents are married and stay together as opposed to a wild spring fling.

And no more infanticides. Please.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 09:30AM - Lily Hayes
Chinese colleges are giving student time off to get their freak on, and the students have a good idea why
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Nancy Pelosi tweeted something stupid about the Trump indictment, and now we all get to laugh about it. And also be concerned about the criminal justice system in our country. But let's focus on the laughs.

After news of the indictment broke, Pelosi tweeted out, "The Grand Jury has acted upon the facts and the law. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence. Hopefully, the former President will peacefully respect the system, which grants him that right."

Wait, what was that? "Prove innocence?" That doesn't sound right...

\u201cThe Grand Jury has acted upon the facts and the law. \n\nNo one is above the law, and everyone has the right to a trial to prove innocence. \n\nHopefully, the former President will peacefully respect the system, which grants him that right.\u201d

— Nancy Pelosi (@Nancy Pelosi) 1680221715

Thankfully, Twitter readers added some helpful context as to what Pelosi might've meant: "Ms. Pelosi mistakenly says that Trump can prove his innocence at trial. Law in the US assumes the innocence of a defendant and the prosecution must prove guilt for a conviction."

However, I'm not so sure this was a mistake. Since Trump announced he was running for President the first time, all investigations launched against him seem to be based on the assumption that he is guilty. Over and over again, his political opposition alleged both criminal and impeachment charges against him, only to have them completely unravel when they couldn't meet the burden of proof. Like the disastrous Mueller Report, which might as well been a doodle from my 5th grade math notebook.

This is especially evident with the current indictment, since we still have no idea what charges Trump is facing. It's not illegal to pay a porn star to keep quiet about an affair. Immoral, sure - but not illegal. Not to mention the 2018 letter that came out last week showing Michael Cohen lied to federal election officials about the payments to Stormy Daniels, and that the Trump campaign was not involved.

From the NY Post:

"In [the letter] Cohen told the Federal Election Commission that he 'used his own personal funds to facilitate a payment of $130,000 to Ms. Stephanie Clifford,' aka Daniels, in 2016.

'Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed Mr. Cohen for the payment directly or indirectly,' Cohen lawyer Stephen Ryan wrote on Feb. 8, 2018."

So it'll be interesting to see how this whole thing shakes out. But right now, it looks like they're just making even more of a martyr out of Donald Trump.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 08:49AM - Lily Hayes
LOL: Nancy Pelosi says the quiet part out loud about Trump's indictment and 'proving innocence'
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Y'all know the drill. Ron DeSantis said something about George Soros that has absolutely nothing to do with Soros's being Jewish. But somehow, that means DeSantis is an antisemite. Because lefty math is weird.

In DeSantis's statement on the indictment of Donald Trump, DeSantis wrote, "The Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney has consistently bent the law to downgrade felonies and to excuse criminal misconduct. Yet, now he is stretching the law to target a political opponent."

The "Soros-backed" attorney he's referring to is Alvin Bragg, who is in fact "Soros-backed". But we'll get to that later. First, watch as MSNBC accuses DeSantis of being a rabid antisemite for *checks notes* stating a fact.

\u201c@JoyAnnReid @GovRonDeSantis .@JoeNBC on DeSantis saying DA Bragg is "Soros-backed": "They\u2019re attacking Jewish international bankers. It is what anti-Semites have been doing for 100s of years ... That\u2019s what they do. They try to blame everything on Jewish international bankers. it\u2019s Germany 1933."\u201d

— Tom Elliott (@Tom Elliott) 1680220432

And there's more! NBC Senior Reporter Ben Collins claimed on Twitter that since George Soros has never personally met with Alvin Bragg, there's simply NO WAY he could be Soros-backed! CheckMATE Republicans.

Obviously, this is very silly. As Joe Cunningham over at RedState pointed out.

\u201cWhether or not Soros met with a politician has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not the politician is \u201cSoros-backed,\u201d and Ben knows this.\u201d

— Joe Cunningham (@Joe Cunningham) 1680263607

Now, about that Soros funding. In May 2021, Soros donated $1M to the Color Of Change PAC, a group "focused on building independent Black political power, amplifying Black voices, electing progressive candidates and holding them accountable". Alvin Bragg's campaign then received over $1M from the Color of Change PAC. And George Soros's son Jonathan and his wife both donated directly to Soros's campaign.

Soros has funded at least 75 progressive prosecutors nationwide, either directly or funneled through various progressive organizations, many of which are connected to his Open Society Foundations. Notably, Soros has funded the defense attorneys of Manhattan, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, and Portland. Soros's DAs all enact soft-on-crime policies like eliminating cash bail. Oh, and Soros also backed the DA of Loudon County, Virginia, where a biologically male student in a skirt allegedly sexually assaulted a girl in the bathroom at school. The father of the girl was convicted of "disorderly conduct" for criticizing the school board.

In conclusion, yes, the Manhattan DA is Soros-backed, as are many DAs across the country. But don't repeat this, lest you be labeled an antisemite and shunned from polite society.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 08:29AM - Lily Hayes
Watch: MSNBC slimes Rom DeSantis as antisemitic for stating facts about district attorney behind Trump's indictment
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

To paraphrase western philosopher Kolby Cooper, diamond rings and cocaine are both one and the same 'cause you spend a whole month's paycheck on something you'll probably regret. Not sure if this dude regrets the diamond ring. Though he might regret the public proposal as he gets BODIED by security.

Ricardo Juarez is the romantic fella here. It was opening day for Los Angeles Dodgers baseball (shout out Jen Van Laar). Juarez wanted to give his girlfriend a proposal she would never forget. Thankfully, they were Dodgers fans and not Mets fans, whose season is already over (shout out my sister).

Ricardo lept the centerfield wall. He ran to centerfield, turned around, and got down on one knee. "Ramona, will you marry...oh f*ck."

It is unclear what the security guards were saying to Ricardo as they rubbed his face into the first. Safe to assume at least one of them was divorced and was telling the romantic Dodgers fan that prostitutes are cheaper in the long run. All while Ramona stands in the bleachers confused, awkward, and noticing way too many smartphones in her face.

It worked out for all involved. The DailyMail reports Ramona said yes to Ricardo's bold proposal before he was handcuffed.

Don't let anyone tell you love is dead. At least, not at a baseball game. At a hockey game maybe. But definitely not baseball.

><><><><><><

Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 31, 2023 at 08:19AM - Brodigan
Watch: Baseball fan's proposal goes hysterically wrong when he gets plowed into centerfield by security
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

If you aren't aware, AOC has a bit of a feud with Chaya Raichik, the lovely lady behind the famed Libs of TikTok account. And they finally met in person. When Chaya served her with an ethics complaint. I'm sure you'll be shocked to find out our socialist darling did not take this well.

Chaya went to AOC's office in the Capitol to deliver the ethics complaint for lying about an American citizen in a committee hearing. AOC wasn't in her office, but luckily, Chaya spotted her while walking through the Capitol and asked for a photo. While they posed for the camera, Chaya revealed she had just dropped off the complaint and said she never inspired a bomb threat. AOC turned and told her, "You're actually super transphobic and I never want to share a space with you."

Dang. That's harsh.

\u201c\ud83d\udea8BREAKING: We served @AOC with an ethics complaint for breaking House rules by intentionally defaming @libsoftiktok.\n\nShe...did not take it well.\n\nThis is the nasty rhetoric of the radical, violent transgender movement.\u201d

— Oversight Project (@Oversight Project) 1680184747

For some background, AOC previously lied about Chaya in a committee hearing with former Twitter executives. Specifically, AOC accused Chaya of lying about Boston Children's Hospital performing sex-change operations on kids, and subsequently blamed her for a bomb threat received by the hospital.

Except, the hospital does perform sex changes on kids. Or at least, they did before everyone found out. Like "gender-affirming hysterectomies". They even said so on their own YouTube page, until people started to notice and they scrubbed all the evidence. A telltale sign of innocence and smear campaigns, obviously.

\u201cBoston Children\u2019s Hospital (@BostonChildrens) is now offering \u201cgender affirming hysterectomies\u201d for young girls https://t.co/JOH5fFtGJ0\u201d

— Libs of TikTok (@Libs of TikTok) 1660237705

Before they were all deleted, Boston Children's Hospital had a whole video series dedicated to detailing the transition process of young teens. This hospital accepted patients seeking top surgery (AKA double mastectomies for girls or breast augmentation for boys) as young as 15 years old, and vaginoplasty at just 17 - though one of the hospitals co-directors said he is "slightly flexible" on the age of males seeking this surgery.

But according to AOC, this is all just a right-wing conspiracy. No one's performing sex changes on children. Only "transphobes" like Libs of TikTok think that.

><><><><><><

Lily is a Zoomer college dropout who somehow landed a writing gig here at LwC.com. In her spare time, she enjoys going for runs, touching grass, and occasionally tweeting tweets for fellow tweeters.

Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Bookmark LouderWithCrowder.com and check us out throughout the day! Also, follow us on Instagram and Twitter.

March 30, 2023 at 03:59PM - Lily Hayes
Watch: LibsofTikTok serves AOC with a defamation complaint, and then it gets hilarious
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder