Click to set custom HTML

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Fighting for the right for female sports to stay female is not a matter of how competitive the players are, but a crucial need to uphold the integrity of women’s sports. This, combined with the safety component, proves just why men should be kept out of women’s sports.

Arizona state Senator Catherine Miranda believes otherwise and implied that girls who want to keep men out of the women’s division lack competition, adding that if it were up to her, she would be more than eager to compete against a man.

According to Fox News:

Arizona state senator Catherine Miranda, a Democrat, has come under scrutiny on social media after an exchange with former NCAA volleyball player and "save women’s sports" activist Kaylie Ray.

Ray showed up to the Arizona Senate Education committee hearing on Wednesday to lobby for a bill that would protect women's sports from biological males. She spoke from the perspective of a former Utah State captain who led a team forfeit against San Jose State in 2024, in protest of a trans athlete on San Jose State University (SJSU).

"I have my sports hat on now. It's all about a sports mentality, growing up in sports, being a tomboy. I mean, you look pretty healthy. I've played against girls that look like you. You look very much in shape and strong," Miranda said.

What does being a “tomboy” have to do with anything? Why does the left always resort to random character traits while defending such reprehensible policies?

The state senator then argued against Ray's position and the bill by claiming she had competed against men herself in sports, and would compete against men in sports and ended her lecture with the question, "How competitive do you think you really are?"

The funny thing is that the senator never even called these "athletes" trans or any gender confused term. She only used the term “men.” This means she knows we are not debating if trans women are women; she has acknowledged that trans women are, in fact, men. That is what makes this all the more worse. She does not even have a leftist talking point to justify her ignorance. She is very much aware that she is advocating for destroying women's sports, and she mocks the athletes trying to uphold fair play.

"It's a sports mentality when you're growing up and how much competition that you'll take on. So it's not just a silver bullet for one community of sports players, it's the individual person on how competitive you wanna be. So you grew up one way. I grew up a different way. I would have taken on a man in a heartbeat. I've played in, I was the only girl sometimes in sports. But to have a man on my team, I would have welcomed it," Miranda said.

The bill already takes into account three separate divisions: Males, females, and coed. If trans women wish to compete not against their biological sex, there is a time and place for that. But when you have men flood women's sports, it ceases to exist. That is the point, and she does women athletes a disservice everywhere by making up some story about how she loves competition.

"But this is just my opinion … and that's why this bill is bad, because you're just putting a whole community of women's sports in one category. When women like me, we have a different opinion. So, how competitive do you think you really are?"

While this would have been insulting, she is far too naive to even give her credit for that. The fact that she tried to mock the athletes fighting on the right side of history, by pretending loads of women are dying to compete against men, is deeply disingenuous. Fortunately, though, her ignorance was on full display.

The men’s mile world record is 3:43.13, and the women's world record is 4:07.64. This is because men have a physical advantage. This is not rocket science, it is not complicated, and it should not be controversial. Men and women are not on the same playing field when it comes to sports. Miranda can lie all she wants by pretending she would have loved to have her sports division flooded with men, but she fools no one. The fact that she tried to chalk this up to competitive spirit shows how little justification the left has for these policies.

Trans women are men. And the worst part is that Miranda KNOWS that.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 15, 2026 at 06:40AM - Danielle B
Democrat senator lashes out at female athlete, questions if she's trying hard enough against (trans) male competitors
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Judge Lawrence VanDyke, “the supposed adults in the room have collectively lost their minds.” He said this in response to his colleagues forcing a Chrisitan spa to admit men into female-only spaces.

According to TPM:

“This is a case about swinging dicks,” began 9th Circuit Judge Lawrence VanDyke in his dissent.

The case in question centered on the policy of two Korean spas in Washington state that allowed only “biological women” to use their services — or more specifically, barred trans women who had not yet undergone surgery. Washington’s Human Rights Commission took enforcement action against the spas for violating an anti-discrimination state law. The spas sued, arguing that the enforcement action had violated their First Amendment rights. A district court dismissed the complaint, and a 9th Circuit panel upheld that dismissal. In a Thursday ruling, the full 9th Circuit declined to rehear the case.

As VanDyke put it, this is selective outrage, as the courts believe the ambiguous feelings of an individual are somehow more important than the religious freedoms of the spa owner. Some feelings are valid, while others are not. In this case, the feelings of the trans individual should not be validated, considering he was “a naked adult male” who allegedly has no quarrels with “exposing himself to thirteen-year-old girls.”

“The fact that the religious owners of a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa are prohibited by law from preventing a naked adult male, who remains sexually attracted to women, from exposing himself to thirteen-year-old girls tragically illustrates the sick and twisted consequences of erasing sex as a coherent legal category,” he wrote, arguing that Thursday’s decision allowed the crimes of “voyeurism and indecent exposure” to be freely carried out by trans people at the spas.

“My distressed colleagues appear to have the fastidious sensibilities of a Victorian nun when it comes to mere unpleasant words in my opinion, yet exhibit the scruples of our dearly departed colleague Judge Reinhardt when it comes to the government trampling on religious liberties and exposing women and girls to male genitalia,” he wrote. “That kind of selective outrage speaks for itself.”

Someone should really inform the left that just because you claim to feel some type of way, that does not automatically bar you from the rules of society. Society has order for a reason, and it is time the left acknowledges that, as more people will inevitably suffer until this is addressed.

To claim that leftists have “collectively lost their minds” would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 14, 2026 at 06:26AM - Danielle B
Trump judge blasts "case about swinging d*cks" and sides with Christian women's spa over trans activists
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML

Click to set custom HTML

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

According to Planned Parenthood Mar Monte's Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Laura Dalton, the “future financial stability remains uncertain” for Planned Parenthood. This is because the organization is no longer getting Medicaid reimbursements for its services after Trump cut its funding. This is an objectively good thing for unborn children. It is not a good thing for over 30 clinics in California and Nevada. Because it turns out, not aborting choices is not a feasible financial model for the abortion provider. This is why they have decided to offer Botox to offset funds.

To call that pathetic would be an understatement.

Planned Parenthood claims to be all in it for helping women. So why not offer more pregnancy resources and prenatal care? Why not help out by giving new mothers diapers, formula, and other essentials? Could it be because this is not financially beneficial for the organization? You do the math.

The next best thing, according to them, would be offering medically unnecessary facial procedures. But hey, at the very least, this won't increase the organization's pursuit of a de facto genocide.

According to The Post Millennial:

"Our kind of future financial stability remains uncertain," Dr. Laura Dalton, the chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, which operates 30 clinics in California and Nevada, said in an interview on March 4. The losses for Planned Parenthood come from portions of the “One Big Beautiful Bill,” and the abortion provider has been trying to fill in the gap with other services.

"We are resilient and innovative, and I like to say that when faced with a crisis, our doors did not close. They opened wider," Dalton said.

To the abortion provider, this is what they consider a “crisis.” However, multiple reports have indicated the organization does not help women when faced with pregnancy crises.

The Planned Parenthood in San Jose will now be offering Botox injections as well as nitrous oxide (laughing gas) for pain management. "We're providing [a] neurotoxin which is commonly referred to as Botox," Dalton said. "And, hopefully, in a few weeks, we'll be launching fillers and sclerotherapy."

Offering Botox won’t erase the fact that they helped contribute to 402,230 abortions in 2022. It will, however, help them in the pursuit to add to that number. Methinks the organization does not care so much about women’s health, but draw your own conclusions.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 13, 2026 at 01:04PM - Danielle B
Planned Parenthood's desperate for cash after Trump cut their funding, so they're breaking into the... Botox market?
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

We now live in a time where claiming your gender is ambiguous gets you a pass for what was once considered serious crimes, and the people are not okay.

“A serial upskirter” has walked out of a Melbourne court free to pursue his dreams of becoming a doctor. According to reports, “He told police he was in the female toilets because 'he wasn’t sure about his gender.’” It is unclear if this statement had an impact on his lack of sentencing, or if he truly is gender confused, so draw your own conclusions.

According to news.com.au:

A serial upskirter whose phone contained more than 100 videos of young women secretly filmed in public toilets has heard of his lecherous behaviour’s “profound impact” on one of his victims.

The man was also an immigrant from Vietnam.

Bao Phuc Cao, 23, a Vietnamese biomedicine student at The University of Melbourne, appeared for sentencing in Melbourne Magistrates’ Court after he was caught filming a woman in a public toilet at a Docklands shopping centre in February 2025.

This was not the first time he was caught engaging in such a morally reprehensible act.

The court was told Cao had been sentenced to a community corrections order in May last year for “effectively identical offending” against one known victim.

It is unclear why he was not deported after the first offense, but in leftist ideology, immigrant status and gender confusion often absolve people of their sins.

Let’s get this straight. A man, who claimed he might be gender confused, was caught filming women in the bathroom not once, but twice, and can now become a doctor, which effectively means he is very likely to treat women later. Is this adding up for you?

At one point in history, filming unconsenting women used to be considered a very serious crime. We are now at the point where, as long as you claim you might be gender confused, you are given a pass. I am having a hard time seeing how this takes the victim's point of view into account.

Even if the man was genuinely confused by his gender, which he might not have been, this is precisely why bathroom laws must correlate with biology. Anyone can claim to feel some way, and there is no objective way to discern who is genuine. Not that genuine gender confusion should allow people to enter the bathroom of the opposite sex, but I digress. Nonetheless, Western society has given creeps a pass to enter the women's restroom and has de facto created far too many victims of sexual assault in that process.

Is that that leftist compassion we keep hearing about?

In the progressive pursuit to affirm all gender confusion, the left has announced to creeps their get out of jail free card. To claim these people are on the wrong side of history would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 13, 2026 at 11:43AM - Danielle B
"Serial upskirter" who filmed over 100 videos up girls' skirts avoids prison time because he isn't sure of his gender
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Rachel Wilson joins us today to discuss gender roles, growing up with brothers and her book, Occult Feminism: The Secret History of Women’s Liberation. Despite women’s studies and gender studies majors becoming more prevalent, the history of prominent feminists is surrounded by a facade while in reality, early feminists were frauds, hucksters and con artists. We discuss how we got here, the negative impacts of feminism and how we fix it.

March 13, 2026 at 09:39AM - Brodigan
Hidden Origins of Feminism: Socialists, Polygamists & Con Artists | Ash Wednesday with Rachel Wilson
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand questioned Air Force Gen. Alexus Grynkewich over how the U.S. military “reportedly issued a strike against an Iranian school using outdated intelligence.” However, her motive behind the questioning did not appear to be genuine, as she tried to bait Grynkewich into admitting this was a “targeted” operation, which it was not, and she very likely knows that.

In other words, just another Democrat more focused on a gotcha clip than genuine concern over what happened. But what else is new?

She attempted to get the general to call out Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth twice in the clip, trying to get him to blame Hegseth’s oversight, even after he claimed it was best to let the investigation finish its course. He even stated that the military goes to great lengths to minimize civilian casualties, to which she then responded that Hegseth does not agree with him. She had zero evidence for that accusation, aside from the fact that she hates him, which is what makes her questioning all the more pathetic.

Senator Roger Wicker then had no choice but to interject, as her choice of semantics was deeply misleading. He informed her that it was best not to use the term “targeted,” as it implies the U.S. intentionally tried to cause harm to school-aged kids, which could not be further from the truth. She then clarified that she was seeking to find out how the U.S. “chose its target,” which implies she very well knew the school was not targeted.

While Gillibrand desperately tried to assign blame to Hegseth for this terrible accident, she failed miserably, as her desire for answers was not the least bit genuine. And to claim this sums up the left’s fake compassion would be an understatement.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

March 13, 2026 at 07:17AM - Danielle B
Shrill Democrat senator breathlessly tries to bait General into blaming Pete Hegseth for Iranian schoolgirl deaths
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder

Click to set custom HTML