John Cleese has pissed off Twitter again. We've seen the movie before. But unlike Monty Python's The Meaning of Life, it doesn't get better with each viewing. A liberal celebrity, like J.K. Rowling, says something slightly critical about transgender activism. The permaoffended woke tw*ts attack. SJW bloggers write about how that celebrity is a transphobe. Cleese's transphobic crime was tweeting that he liked J.K, Rowling.
The actor went a few rounds chirping back at his critics. This one tweet, besides being funny, also provides a valid point.
Oh I do sympathy and support all the time, for most of the Third world. Except for Glasgow, of course
I exclude all wokes, of course. I hope they fry in their own sanctimoniousness and narcissistic posturing
Until they get a sense of perspective, that is... https://t.co/yfzfWDx7Az
— John Cleese (@JohnCleese) November 22, 2020
There is a clear line between being a sympathetic person and a woke tw*t. It's how much you virtue-signal over how sympathetic you are. It's obvious people who don't signal their virtue as beautiful and brave as they do hate all the things. They must be shamed and canceled. It's no wonder liberals like Cleese and Rowling have no patience for their bollocks. A pile of FU money usually helps.
What's great, politically speaking, is that the wokes do all the right's recruiting for them. Not that Cleese will be voting for Boris Johnson any time soon. I'm talking about the non-famous people without the FU money. People attacked for not tweeting the right thing, using the right words, in the right order. Unlike the woke tw*ts, the right won't hate you for having the slightest difference of opinion from them.
November 24, 2020 at 08:18AM - Brodigan
John Cleese Wants Woke People to Fry, Makes an Important Point
Click the headline to read the full report at Louder With Crowder