Patrick Wyrick is either the 'wonder boy' or the 'bastard' of the high court. After today's ruling, I clearly side with the latter. He was not constitutionally allowed to be nominated, much less serve; yet the judicial nominating committee had little regard for the constitution, so they nominated an OKC resident to a slot constitutionally reserved for a voter in the Second Judicial District ('Little Dixie' region) of the state. Gov. Fallin had even less regard for the constitution when she selected him over the only two other options given to her.
And even more egregious was the way the high court refused to even listen to a challenge by an Oklahoma legal watchdog group. The court said that only the two other finalists had constitutional standing to challenge. Tell that to 'Little Dixie' residents who just got denied constitutional representation. They got a 'carpetbagger' scam.
Now this young esquire is denying the plain text of the constitution and replacing it with the court's own seance sessions where they divine the attitude of the founders... if it suits their desired outcomes. Never mind that the constitution was amended more than 150 times by State Questions. Why don't they divine the attitudes of us who were here in 1992 and voted for the stiff provisions?
Private sector commerce exercises this pandering with 'senior discount' promotions. They effectively charge a premium to anyone younger than 55. But that's a proprietor's right. We can take our business somewhere else if we don't like it.
My personal involvement with this...
My volunteer work extends deeply into the area of mental health advocacy and training. I volunteer my time to the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) through the Oklahoma organization and I serve on the Tulsa affiliate's board. As the Chairman of the Legislative and Public Policy Committee, I spent a good deal of time at the capitol and in meetings with govt. officials from all levels.
A strategic decision was made by lawmakers to take away about 1/4 of the general revenue funding to ODMHSAS and instead, earmark about the same amount to come from the controversial new tobacco tax hike. I was repeatedly asked to advocate for this new tax. That pressure came from lawmakers, lobbyists, Contracted mental health providers, and other citizen advocates. But that earmarked money would only apply to the current fiscal year. After that, ODMHSAS would have to fight for sustaining capital from other means... perhaps some other new tax.
It's a way to get passionate advocates to do the work of activism for free. It's also a way to get the public to insist on the new funding because of the dire predictions of what the consequences would otherwise be.
Teachers in our public schools are very aware of this, because they have been played in much the same way. Remember how our education problem would be fixed, if only we'd approve of:
I continually said 'No' to those who asked me to advocate for the new tobacco tax. The truth is that the existing tobacco tax and TSET settlement money is sitting in the banks and the state will not let that $1Billion+ fund be used for addiction related care. Instead that trust is wasting it on frivolous ad campaigns about drinking enough water and other 'feel good' initiatives. I advocated a change in state code and policy so that TSET money could be accessed in a more responsible manner. Lawmakers ignored that idea.
Now the lawmakers are preparing a narrative for a special session and the rhetoric will heat up for even more tax schemes. We could just put the matter before the citizens for a vote. But they don't seem to trust us anymore. Well, we don't seem to trust them very much, anymore... so the feeling seems mutual.
I'll speak for myself. I am insulted that lawmakers, lobbyists, and corporate contractors would exploit the many families who care for loved ones with chronic mental illness. Public mental health is a constitutional role of the state and it's equitable funding is mandated in our state constitution. If you think it's more than you want to pay, then consider the high cost of not paying. When the state abdicates it's constitutional role, the counties are forced to get them off the streets through criminalizing their disoriented behavior and spending way more through county and municipal agencies. It is abject inhumanity.
Making these heroic families and individuals help push new taxes so the politicians can divert them to other programs, is highly unethical and indicates a lack of compassion for the suffering among us. This is a public safety mandate and we need to count on all govt. officials to understand that a sensible treatment hospital is far more essential to the state than a Pops Museum or High Speed Rail venture.
- David Van Risseghem