44 Republican House Members Seek To Recall TaxPayer Rights

3/15/2018

With no warning and under the cover of overwhelming bills and no posted floor agenda, The Leadership pushed a measure to recall the constitutional amendment that the voters worked so hard to put in place when we last had a runaway legislature passing massive new taxes.

The vast majority of House Democrats voted with a conservative Republican minority who held faithful to the OKGOP Platform principles regarding taxation.

Grassroots Republican Groups are already organizing to prepare their response to this development within the GOP.
The Tulsa Area Republican Assembly is calling a meeting on March 20th, in Tulsa. The topic will be candidates and challengers filing in targeted seats, as needed, Preparing an election message of taxpayer protections and due respect, and support for incumbents who demonstrate adherence to the OKGOP principles of conservatism.

Below, we have posted the 44 Republican House members who voted to begin a recall of constitutional rights of the voters to chose tax increase proposals.

Click on the Member's Photo to display that Member's information.

Babinec, Greg
(R) District 33

Baker, Rhonda
(R) District 60

Caldwell, Chad
(R) District 40

Casey, Dennis
(R) District 35

Cockroft, Josh
(R) District 27

Echols, Jon
(R) District 90

Enns, John
(R) District 41

Fetgatter, Scott
(R) District 16

Ford, Roger
(R) District 95

Ford, Ross
(R) District 76

Frix, Avery
(R) District 13

Hall, Elise
(R) District 100

Henke, Katie
(R) District 71

Hilbert, Kyle
(R) District 29

Jordan, John P
(R) District 43

Kannady, Chris
(R) District 91

Kerbs, Dell
(R) District 26

Lawson, Mark
(R) District 30

Martinez, Ryan
(R) District 39

McBride, Mark
(R) District 53

McCall, Charles
(R) District 22

McDaniel, R
(R) District 83

McEntire, Marc
(R) District 50

Montgomery, J
(R) District 62

Mulready, Glen
(R) District 68

Newton, Carl
(R) District 58

Nollan, Jadine
(R) District 66

O'Donnell, T
(R) District 23

Ortega, Charles
(R) District 52

Osborn, Leslie
(R) District 47

Osburn, Mike
(R) District 81

Ownbey, Pat
(R) District 48

Pfeiffer, John
(R) District 38

Roberts, Dustin
(R) District 21

Rogers, M
(R) District 98

Sears, Earl
(R) District 11

Taylor, Zack
(R) District 28

Thomsen, Todd
(R) District 25

Vaughan, Steve
(R) District 37

Wallace, Kevin
(R) District 32

West, Josh
(R) District 5

West, Tammy
(R) District 84

Worthen, Rand
(R) District 64

Wright, Harold
(R) District 57

Comments

Sooner Politics
Editorial

David Van Risseghem reports the events and adds some perspective.

Author

David Van Risseghem is the Publisher of SoonerPolitics.org. The resource is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform. This endeavor seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement...

"No politician 'checks off every box" in your list of issues. You have to prioritize and use personal discretion regarding every current and future issue that you can imagine. Then you have to also judge integrity & consistency. A candidate's openness to study the issues & courage to think for themselves. Then you need to review their honesty & work ethic. I respect any voter's decision, when they've informed themselves and took voting seriously." - David Van Risseghem

FRONT PAGE • OKLAHOMA NEWS • EDITORIAL • SOONER ISSUES • STATE GROUPS • SOONER ANALYSTS • LAWMAKER'S JOURNAL • NATION • NATIONAL COMMENTARY • CARTOONS •

918 . 928 . 7776

SoonerPolitics.org is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform & restored liberty. We seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement... Content of the diverse columns are solely at the discretion of the dozens of websites who create the content. David Van Risseghem is the founder of this platform.
Sooner Politics News is a platform, not a media site. All our bloggers get their feeds promoted regardless of content. As soon as We suppress or delete even one posting, we become an endorser of whatever We didn't censor..The publisher doesn't (and could not) logically agree with all the content, so we would not expect any rational reader to agree, either. What we do hope, is that readers will think for themselves, and at least be better informed of the issues, events, and values that our citizen journalists work hard to provide for free.. We automate much of the tasks so that our sources' content gets as much exposure as possible. We encourage constructive discussion & debate. The solution is more free speech, not less.