9 of 15 Candidacy Challenges Prevail At Hearing

4/23/2018

The Oklahoma State Election board held a marathon docket of hearings today. At issue were 15 contests of candidacy for various elections ranging from district judge to legislator, to State Attorney General.
At 9am the contestants and contestees were all required to be at room 230 of the state capitol for a roll call of sorts and to demonstrate that they would even have the right to make their case.
The election board secretary, Paul Ziriax, announced 2 cases were settled already. One was by a candidate withdrawal from a race and the other was a contestant withdrawing his complaint against his opponent.
Then Rep. Kevin McDugle had to plead mercy when he failed to follow instructions and have a cashiers check to present to the board. The board gave him until noon to come back with the proper fee in proper form. One other novice candidate also took advantage of that precedent and got the same mercy.
Rep. Bobby Cleveland and one other contestant succeeded when the contestees failed to show up. Cleveland had 2 such cases ruled by default for failure to appear.
Then came the main event. The Drummond v Hunter case. We wrote about that decision earlier today. Hunter was allowed to stay in the race despite declaring principle residence in Virginia within the past 10 years.

After the lunch break the cases averaged 30 minutes per final ruling. The widow of David Brumbaugh was allowed to run under the name she held for 20 years. She did marry this month and the board provided accommodation for her to update her legal name change. Ford claimed that Shelly Brumbaugh is seeking to deceive the voters. the board didn't buy it. Nor did they when Sen. Anestasia Pittman's daughter was challenged under a similar argument by Nkem House.
McDugle avoided some very damaging revelations in the room when he claimed his former residence which he hasn't been living in since Easter of last year. Two months later his abandoned wife finally filed for divorce. McDugle was living in OKC and having an affair with another woman. Mahoney's legal council dropped the ball on a couple of key points and procedures.

At the beginning of the day there was not sufficient room for all parties to fit in the hearing room and several times the 'bailiff' had to go out to the hall and summon parties in for new cases.
The final matter was not adjudicated until after 8pm.

AG Mike Hunter greets the opponent who challenged his candidate qualifications on residency requirements.

Comments

Sooner Politics
Editorial

David Van Risseghem reports the events and adds some perspective.

Author

David Van Risseghem is the Publisher of SoonerPolitics.org. The resource is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform. This endeavor seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement...

"No politician 'checks off every box" in your list of issues. You have to prioritize and use personal discretion regarding every current and future issue that you can imagine. Then you have to also judge integrity & consistency. A candidate's openness to study the issues & courage to think for themselves. Then you need to review their honesty & work ethic. I respect any voter's decision, when they've informed themselves and took voting seriously." - David Van Risseghem

FRONT PAGE • OKLAHOMA NEWS • EDITORIAL • SOONER ISSUES • STATE GROUPS • SOONER ANALYSTS • LAWMAKER'S JOURNAL • NATION • NATIONAL COMMENTARY • CARTOONS •

918 . 928 . 7776

SoonerPolitics.org is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform & restored liberty. We seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement... Content of the diverse columns are solely at the discretion of the dozens of websites who create the content. David Van Risseghem is the founder of this platform.
Sooner Politics News is a platform, not a media site. All our bloggers get their feeds promoted regardless of content. As soon as We suppress or delete even one posting, we become an endorser of whatever We didn't censor..The publisher doesn't (and could not) logically agree with all the content, so we would not expect any rational reader to agree, either. What we do hope, is that readers will think for themselves, and at least be better informed of the issues, events, and values that our citizen journalists work hard to provide for free.. We automate much of the tasks so that our sources' content gets as much exposure as possible. We encourage constructive discussion & debate. The solution is more free speech, not less.