| The Federal Justice Department appears to be at least an accessory to an unprecedented election fraud plot. Media outlets appear to also be at least giving 'cover' to the plot. Fox News Channel's news dept. is the most obvious player in national media efforts to suppress any narrative of corruption by county and state election agencies. The conspiracy narrative would add about 100k fake votes to the statewide Democrat slate. Trump only lost by 10k and McSally lost the US Senate race by 80k. These are the main takeaways of yesterday's 'bombshell' letter, released by the Arizona legislature. Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, read the letter. It was dated November 10, 2020, and addressed to the Criminal Division of the DOJ. "In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals." |  The 'smoking gun' letter from a Democrat whistleblower details how state officials will not have the political will to investigate the crime to the degree necessary to uncover the full scope of the criminal operation. And candidates will not have the money needed to pay for the cost of a complete recount & recanvass. |
Arizona Whistleblower Letter"Please be advised the Pima County Recorder, located at 240 N. Stone Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, 85701 in Pima County, Arizona, and the Democrat Party added fraud votes. In the initial count of the vote by mail (VBM) totals released at 8 pm on November 3, 2020, There are approximately 35,000 fraud votes added to each Democrat candidates’ vote totals. Candidates impacted include County, State, and Federal Election candidates. Through the utilization of the automated ballot count machines in Pima County Elections, My understanding is that 35,000 was embedded into each Democrat candidates’ total votes. Below are the meeting notes. In a meeting I was invited to by the Democrat party in Pima County, Arizona on September 10, 2020, no phones or recording devices were allowed. A presentation was given including detailed plans to embed 35,000 votes in a spread configured distribution to each Democrat candidate’s vote totals. When I asked, “How in the world would 35,000 votes be kept hidden, or from being discovered?” It was stated that spread distribution will be embedded across the total registered vote range and will not exceed the registered voter count. And the 35,000 was determined allowable for Pima County based on our county registered voter count. It was also stated total voter turnout versus total registered voters determined how many votes we can embed. The embedding will also adjust based on voter turnout. Because the embedded votes are distributed sporadically, all embedded votes will not be found if audited because embeds are in groups of approximately 1,000. This is so the County Recorder can declare an oversight issue or error, as a group of 1,000 is a normal and acceptable error. Maricopa County’s embed totals will be substantially larger than Pima, due to embeds being calculated based on the total number of registered voters. When I asked, “Has this ever been tested, and how do we know it works?” the response was, yes, this has been tested and has shown significant success in Arizona judicial retention elections, since 2014. Even undetectable in post audits because no candidate will spend the kind of funds needed to audit and contact voters to verify votes and the full potential of the total registered voters, which is more than 500,000 registered voters. This year our Secretary of State has removed precinct level detail from election night releases, so candidates can’t see precinct over-votes. This is what I have from this meeting. Just thought I’d report this. Not sure if you can do anything since I was unable to have a recording device at this meeting. Thank You.’ |
The Oklahoma Election Fraud Plot. It's a narrative which sheds new light on Oklahoma's June primary election and the cloud of suspicion about a a 'dump' of mail-in ballots which put the Medicaid clause in the Oklahoma Constitution. The June Oklahoma primary may have served as a 'dry run' for the national election fraud plot. It proved to be a huge success and the plot moved forward when Oklahoma's now-disgraced Attorney General refused to even talk with citizens who sought a criminal investigation of the June election anomalies across Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Constitution was significantly changed by a margin of a few thousand ballots in Oklahoma.
Cleveland County Election board is especially suspect. The Republican party leadership in Cleveland County has a large contingent of 'Never Trumpers'. In the November election, a Democrat legislator only won by a few dozen votes. Sadly, the OKGOP completely dropped the ball and failed to file a recount and audit of the absentee vote process. |
