Sooner Politics.org
  • Front Page
  • Oklahoma News
    • Oklahoma Reports
    • OCPAC
    • Oklahoma Constitution News
    • Citizen of the Year
    • Oklahoma History
    • Today, In History
    • Oklahoma Center Square
    • Faked Out Sports
    • AP Wire
    • NewsBreak Oklahoma
    • Inside the Capitol
    • Lawton Rocks
    • Muskogee Now
    • OSU Sports
  • Podcasts
  • SPTV
    • Fresh Black Coffee, with Eddie Huff
    • AircraftSparky
    • Red River TV
    • Oklahoma TV
    • E PLURIBUS OTAP
    • Tapp's Common Sense
  • Editorial
    • From the Editor
    • Weekend Report
    • 3D Politics
    • Reagan Speaks
  • Sooner Issues
    • Corruption Chronicle
    • Constitutional Grounds
    • State Groups
  • Sooner Analysts
    • OCPA
    • Muskogee Politico
    • Rooke Report
    • SoonerPoll
    • Everett Piper
    • Andrew Spiropoulos
    • Tulsa Devil's Advocate
    • Eddie Huff & Friends
    • 1889 Institute
    • Steve Byas
    • Michael Bates
    • Steve Fair
    • Josh Lewis
    • Tulsa Today
    • OK2A
    • Dr. Jim Meehan
    • AFP Oklahoma
    • Sooner Tea Party
  • Nation
    • Bongino Report
    • Breitbart News
    • Daily wire
    • Steven Crowder
    • InfoWars News
    • Jeff Davis
    • Alex Lains
    • The F1rst
    • Nigel Farage
    • NewsMax
    • America's Voice
    • Ron Paul Institute
    • Bill Gertz
    • Emerald
    • Just the News
    • Trey Gowdy
    • Fox Politics
    • National Commentary
  • Wit & Whimsy
    • Libs of Tiktok
    • It's Still The Law
    • Terrence Williams
    • Witty Cartoons
    • Will Rogers Said
    • Steeple Chasers
    • The Partisan
    • Satire
  • SoonerPolitics.org

Several Candidates Face Legal Challenges For Ballot Eligibility

4/18/2018

Comments

 
 Last night the Oklahoma State Election Board posted the docket of legal challenges to the candidacies of those seeking elective office.
  Of the many cases, one very notable & high profile statewide office is in the midst of this eligibility drama.
  The recently appointed Attorney General, Mike Hunter, is facing his own challenger. AG candidate, Gentner Drummond, is contesting Hunter on a matter of meeting residency requirements. The Oklahoma Constitution states that in order to be a qualified candidate, Hunter would have to be deemed qualified as "an elector" of the state for the preceding 10 years. 
  In Hunter's original appointment, the Supreme Court held jurisdiction on eligibility challenges. The high court  often limits  the 'standing' to challenge so that the citizens generally cannot press a case. But in this hearing, any citizen has broad standing to file a challenge.
Article 6 § 3. Eligibility to certain state offices.

 "No person shall be eligible to the office of Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, State Auditor and Inspector, Attorney General, State Treasurer or Superintendent of Public Instruction except a citizen of the United States of the age of not less than thirty-one (31) years and who shall have been ten (10) years next preceding his or her election, or appointment, a qualified elector of this state."
Picture
The 2016 Election Board heard several challenges of candidacy. they provided a web feed for live viewing of the proceedings.
Article 3 § 1. Qualifications of electors.

Subject to such exceptions as the Legislature may prescribe, all citizens of the United States, over the age of eighteen (18) years, who are bona fide residents of this state, are qualified electors of this state.

  The challenge to the AG's qualifications does expose a flaw in Oklahoma election law. Our research of the statutes does not indicate any clear language which prohibits a person from retaining their voter registration after moving out of a particular precinct.  But the law does not require candidates to be registered voters. in order to seek elective office. It only requires them to be "qualified electors". And a qualified elector must be a "bona fide resident.
  To become a registered voter, you must affirm proper residency.
§26-4-101.  Persons entitled to become registered voters - Exceptions.  "Every person who is a qualified elector as defined by Section 1 of Article III of the Oklahoma Constitution shall be entitled to become a registered voter in the precinct of his residence..."

As best we can judge, Mike Hunter was not a "qualified elector" of Oklahoma while residing in the DC area, even though a loophole may have let him remain on the Oklahoma voter rolls.
The language to remain a registered voter only stipulates that if you register in a new location, your old registration is thereby invalid. So if Mike Hunter registered to vote in Virginia, Maryland or DC while living there during much of the last 10 years, then Hunter is not a legal Oklahoma voter, nor a qualified Oklahoma elector.
  In other words, Hunter is only a qualified Oklahoma voter if he remains completely disconnected from any civic duty to vote in his DC metro home (during the years he worked as a lobbyist).
  There is an obvious need to strengthen Oklahoma voter registration law. But the key here, is that "Qualified Elector" is not the same as "Registered Voter". And the Oklahoma Constitution is clear that only real and true adult residents residing in Oklahoma are deemed "Qualified Elector". And Hunter clearly did not reside in Oklahoma for all of the past 10 years.
  Typically, the AG's office provides legal counsel to the Election Board members during the contests. But in this case it is obvious that  the AG's employees must recuse themselves from any advisory role until the Drummond v Hunter case is adjudicated.
  Two years ago, the Oklahoma Senate provided live video coverage of the Eligibility hearings. It is expected that this same accommodation will be provided at next Wednesday's proceedings.

Statutes For Contesting A Candidacy

​​§26-5-118.  Contests of candidacy.
Any candidate, hereafter referred to as petitioner, may contest the candidacy of any other candidate for the same office, hereafter referred to as contestee, by filing a written petition with the secretary of the election board with whom said candidate filed the declaration of candidacy.  In the event only one candidate files for an office, a petition contesting the candidacy may be filed by any registered voter who is eligible to vote for the candidate.
Added by Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-118, operative Jan. 1, 1975.  Amended by Laws 1990, c. 306, § 4, emerg. eff. May 30, 1990; Laws 1994, c. 360, § 1, eff. July 1, 1994; Laws 1997, c. 130, § 1, emerg. eff. April 17, 1997.

§26-5-119.  Time for filing contest.
The petition must be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on the second business day following the close of the filing period.
Added by Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-119, operative Jan. 1, 1975.  Amended by Laws 2011, c. 196, § 8, eff. Nov. 1, 2011.
§26-5-120.  Grounds for contest.
Said petition must allege that the contestee was not qualified by law to become a candidate for the office for which he filed a Declaration of Candidacy and must contain the reasons therefor. Reasons not appearing on the face of the petition shall be considered waived and shall not be grounds for a contest.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-120, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-121.  Deposit required for contest.
The petition must be accompanied by a cashier's check or certified check in the amount of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
Added by Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-121, operative Jan. 1, 1975.  Amended by Laws 1976, c. 90, § 3, emerg. eff. May 6, 1976; Laws 1999, c. 88, § 7, emerg. eff. April 13, 1999.

§26-5-122.  Date for hearing contest.
When such a petition is properly filed, the secretary of the appropriate election board shall set the matter down for a hearing, said hearing to be not fewer than three (3) days from the date of filing of said petition.
Added by Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-122, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-123.  Service of notice.
It shall be the duty of the petitioner to cause a true copy of the petition and notice of the date and place of the hearing to be served on the contestee.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-123, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-124.  Time for service of notice.
Said service shall be made in person, where possible, within twenty-four (24) hours after the date and place of the hearing has been set by the election board secretary.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-124, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-125.  Sheriff to serve notice - Secretary of election board made agent for constructive service.
Service shall be made by the sheriff of the county of residence of the contestee as to all offices, except that of sheriff, in which case the same shall be served by the county clerk of the appropriate county, and the certificate of returns of such sheriff or county clerk, showing the inability to make such service within the aforementioned time, shall be deemed sufficient proof of the absence of the contestee, or the inability to serve such petition and notice upon him, and to justify the constructive service herein provided. When personal service is impossible, within said time, it is hereby made the duty of said petitioner to serve said true copies upon the secretary of the appropriate election board.  Provided that for the purpose of such constructive service, the Secretary of the State Election Board and the secretaries of the county election boards are hereby made and constituted the service agents for all candidates who file declarations of candidacy with them.  By filing his declaration of candidacy, each candidate shall thereby be conclusively presumed to have accepted the terms and provisions hereof and specifically the aforesaid constructive service.  When constructive service becomes necessary, said constructive service shall be made at the date, time and place of said hearing, after proof of inability to personally serve the contestee has been returned to the petitioner.
Amended by Laws 1983, c. 171, § 8, emerg. eff. June 6, 1983.

§26-5-126.  Hearing of contest.
The petition may be heard without formal pleadings being filed in answer or reply thereto.  The election board with whom the petition is filed shall have the authority to issue subpoenas and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence. Such election board shall have the authority to receive the testimony of witnesses under oath, said oath to be administered by the secretary of the board.  At the conclusion of the hearing, the board shall render its decision and the vote of the individual members in writing.  The decision of such board shall in all cases be final.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-126, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-127.  Candidacy may be stricken.
If the election board determines that the contestee was not qualified to become a candidate for the office for which he filed a Declaration of Candidacy, it may order that his candidacy be stricken and that his name not be placed on the ballot.
Added by Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-127, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-128.  Declaration may be amended.
If said contestee's Declaration of Candidacy may be amended or corrected to conform to law, the election board may order the same to be done, if the board determines such amendment or correction to be proper at the time of its order or decision.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-128, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-129.  Answer to contest - Deposit required.
Should the contestee desire to appear in answer to said contest, said contestee shall be required, at the time of filing his answer, or, if no answer is filed, at the time of his appearance, to deposit with the secretary of the election board a cashier's check or certified check in the same amount as that filed by the petitioner.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-129, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-130.  Burden of proof on petitioner.
The burden of proof shall be upon the petitioner to sustain the allegations in his petition.  However, failure of the contestee to appear or answer thereto shall be deemed to place him in default, and shall constitute an admission of the allegations of the petition, in which event, if the board determines that the factual allegations of the petition constitute appropriate grounds for disqualification, such contestee's candidacy shall be stricken.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-130, operative Jan. 1, 1975.

§26-5-131.  Disposition of deposits.
In the event the petitioner is successful at said hearing, his deposit shall be returned to him, and all costs of such hearing shall be deducted from the deposit of the contestee, and the balance, if any, shall be returned to said contestee.  If the contestee does not file an answer or make an appearance, or if the petitioner is unsuccessful, all costs incurred shall be paid from the deposit made by the petitioner, and the balance, if any, shall be returned to said petitioner.
Laws 1974, c. 153, § 5-131, operative Jan. 1, 1975.
Comments

    Sooner Politics
      Editorial  

    Picture
    David Van Risseghem reports the events and adds some perspective. 


    Search Our Archives.

    Get A Daily News Email

    * indicates required

    Get new posts by email:


    Archives

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    August 2015
    January 2015


    Subscribe in a reader
    ​We recently moved our blog. Our archives are still partially stored at our old site. 

    Author

    David Van Risseghem  is the Publisher of SoonerPolitics.org. The resource is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform.  This endeavor seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement...

    ​"No politician 'checks off every box" in your list of issues. You have to prioritize and use personal discretion regarding every current and future issue that you can imagine. Then you have to also judge integrity & consistency. A candidate's openness to study the issues & courage to think for themselves. Then you need to review their honesty & work ethic.  I respect any voter's decision, when they've informed themselves and took voting seriously." - David Van Risseghem
​FRONT PAGE •  OKLAHOMA NEWS • EDITORIAL • SOONER ISSUES •​ STATE GROUPS •​ SOONER ANALYSTS •​ LAWMAKER'S JOURNAL •​ NATION •​ NATIONAL COMMENTARY •​ CARTOONS •​ ​
Picture

918 . 928 . 7776

 SoonerPolitics.org is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform & restored liberty. We seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement... Content of the diverse columns are solely at the discretion of the dozens of websites who create the content.   David Van Risseghem  is the founder of this platform.
 Sooner Politics News is a platform, not a media site. All our bloggers get their feeds promoted regardless of content. As soon as We suppress or delete even one posting, we become an endorser of whatever We didn't censor..The publisher doesn't (and could not) logically agree with all the content, so we would not expect any rational reader to agree, either. What we do hope, is that readers will think for themselves, and at least be better informed of the issues, events, and values that our citizen journalists work hard to provide for free.. We automate much of the tasks so that our sources' content gets as much exposure as possible. We encourage constructive discussion & debate. The solution is more free speech, not less.​

  • Front Page
  • Oklahoma News
    • Oklahoma Reports
    • OCPAC
    • Oklahoma Constitution News
    • Citizen of the Year
    • Oklahoma History
    • Today, In History
    • Oklahoma Center Square
    • Faked Out Sports
    • AP Wire
    • NewsBreak Oklahoma
    • Inside the Capitol
    • Lawton Rocks
    • Muskogee Now
    • OSU Sports
  • Podcasts
  • SPTV
    • Fresh Black Coffee, with Eddie Huff
    • AircraftSparky
    • Red River TV
    • Oklahoma TV
    • E PLURIBUS OTAP
    • Tapp's Common Sense
  • Editorial
    • From the Editor
    • Weekend Report
    • 3D Politics
    • Reagan Speaks
  • Sooner Issues
    • Corruption Chronicle
    • Constitutional Grounds
    • State Groups
  • Sooner Analysts
    • OCPA
    • Muskogee Politico
    • Rooke Report
    • SoonerPoll
    • Everett Piper
    • Andrew Spiropoulos
    • Tulsa Devil's Advocate
    • Eddie Huff & Friends
    • 1889 Institute
    • Steve Byas
    • Michael Bates
    • Steve Fair
    • Josh Lewis
    • Tulsa Today
    • OK2A
    • Dr. Jim Meehan
    • AFP Oklahoma
    • Sooner Tea Party
  • Nation
    • Bongino Report
    • Breitbart News
    • Daily wire
    • Steven Crowder
    • InfoWars News
    • Jeff Davis
    • Alex Lains
    • The F1rst
    • Nigel Farage
    • NewsMax
    • America's Voice
    • Ron Paul Institute
    • Bill Gertz
    • Emerald
    • Just the News
    • Trey Gowdy
    • Fox Politics
    • National Commentary
  • Wit & Whimsy
    • Libs of Tiktok
    • It's Still The Law
    • Terrence Williams
    • Witty Cartoons
    • Will Rogers Said
    • Steeple Chasers
    • The Partisan
    • Satire
  • SoonerPolitics.org