Sooner Politics.org
  • Front Page
  • Oklahoma News
    • Oklahoma Reports
    • OCPAC
    • Oklahoma Constitution News
    • Citizen of the Year
    • Oklahoma History
    • Today, In History
    • Oklahoma Center Square
    • Faked Out Sports
    • AP Wire
    • NewsBreak Oklahoma
    • Inside the Capitol
    • Lawton Rocks
    • Muskogee Now
    • OSU Sports
  • Podcasts
  • SPTV
    • Fresh Black Coffee, with Eddie Huff
    • AircraftSparky
    • Red River TV
    • Oklahoma TV
    • E PLURIBUS OTAP
    • Tapp's Common Sense
  • Editorial
    • From the Editor
    • Weekend Report
    • 3D Politics
    • Reagan Speaks
  • Sooner Issues
    • Corruption Chronicle
    • Constitutional Grounds
    • State Groups
  • Sooner Analysts
    • OCPA
    • Muskogee Politico
    • Rooke Report
    • SoonerPoll
    • Everett Piper
    • Andrew Spiropoulos
    • Tulsa Devil's Advocate
    • Eddie Huff & Friends
    • 1889 Institute
    • Steve Byas
    • Michael Bates
    • Steve Fair
    • Josh Lewis
    • Tulsa Today
    • OK2A
    • Dr. Jim Meehan
    • AFP Oklahoma
    • Sooner Tea Party
  • Nation
    • Bongino Report
    • Breitbart News
    • Daily wire
    • Steven Crowder
    • InfoWars News
    • Jeff Davis
    • Alex Lains
    • The F1rst
    • Nigel Farage
    • NewsMax
    • America's Voice
    • Ron Paul Institute
    • Bill Gertz
    • Emerald
    • Just the News
    • Trey Gowdy
    • Fox Politics
    • National Commentary
  • Wit & Whimsy
    • Libs of Tiktok
    • It's Still The Law
    • Terrence Williams
    • Witty Cartoons
    • Will Rogers Said
    • Steeple Chasers
    • The Partisan
    • Satire
  • SoonerPolitics.org

The Case Against The Auto Tax Increase

8/13/2017

Comments

 
   The Oklahoma Supreme Court issued a 'slam dunk' unanimous ruling in figurative 'sound barrier speed', on Thursday. they struck down a shameless money-grab which tried to cloak itself as a state-run smoking cessation program.  The newest and most controversial justice on the court, Patrick Wyrick, wrote a brilliant, plain-spoken, and thoroughly-reasoned opinion. Two justices partially dissented, but they did not elaborate. Wyrick wrote a masterpiece of both form and substance.
  The remaining cases will not be so simple to prevail upon.
   The matter of removing exemptions to a tax, is essentially the same as a bill to establish a new, yet narrower tax.  But the comments and questions of the 9 justices give us a hint that they do not have a common mindset on the matter.
  Justice Gurich claims that the founders of our state had a disdain for exemptions. She says that tax burdens should be broadly and equitably applied to all. At least that's what she gratuitously asserts as being the heart and soul of the framers of Oklahoma's constitution. She asserts that carve-outs and narrow exemptions are a form of pandering and abuse of the whole, to give a gift of money to a select demographic.
Picture

​ But her argument is rebutted by the very facts of the Auto tax. Oklahoma has two classes of taxation on commerce.   The sales tax is more commonly understood. We see it applied to us every day. Excise tax is only on specific goods. Whereas sales tax applies to just about everything you buy (usually with specific exceptions such as unprepared food and clothing), excise taxes are applied to specific goods.  If an item or service is subjected to a sales tax, it generally is not hit with an excise tax. Gasoline sales are a prime example. While the state collects 4.5% sales tax on most other items, Oklahoma charges a flat 17¢ on each gallon of gasoline. That's nearly double the sales tax when the fuel sells for $2 per gallon. So if the state eliminates the sales tax exclusion on fuels, they are effectively singling out motor fuels for punitive taxation to an even greater degree.

Auto Taxes

 
  Wyrick came up with his own analogy to refute the argument of eliminating exclusions when he challenged the state's oral arguments, about 27 minutes into the session. I will paraphrase.

 "If a new tax proposal is so controversial that a legislative body cannot attain 75% support, they may seek to overcome the resistance of several members by explicitly exempting a subject significant concern. If that explicit exemption convinces enough members so that the 75% support is obtained and the bill become law; then the same legislative body can turn right around and remove that exemption immediately with a mere 50% threshold. So that there is no longer a 75% support for the tax in the first place."
PictureGurich, Combs, Reif, Colbert, Winchester, Edmondson, Kueger, Wyrick, & Watt
  The Leverage case was extensively cited in the oral arguments. That is when an unintended exemption arises out of unintended 'loop holes'. In that situation, a legislature is not changing the intention of the tax code. It is merely being more clear and explicit about the original intention. Chief Justice Combs & Justice Kauger seem to also support this narrower intention of the Leverage case.
​
Intention Is everything
  The intent and impact of Article 5 Section 33, as amended in 1992 by the revolt of the voters, is to prevent the state from extracting more money from the people, unless certain support is attained. Either 75% of the legislature or 50% of the people. It matters not what justification is cited. even equalization and 'fairness' does not exempt the legislature from the constitutional requirements.  Gurich's comments seem to indicate that her prevailing concern is whether a change in tax code is "more fair". She sees 'fairness' as a superior issue to constitutional process. To Gurich's expression, the bill is constitutional because it's 'fair'. It's fair because it elevates excise taxes to the same rate as sales taxes. The Gurich line of questioning should bother any constitutionalist, because it suggests that she is willing to assert legislative powers from her bench.
 Justice Reif offered up his understanding of the legislative powers of granting exemptions as a "legislative Grace" power. He sees that power as superseding the mandates of Article Five of the constitution. But Reif's analogy is only that. An idea of his own to justify his outcomes. If the court does not hold this legislative action to the clear language of the constitution, then we effectively have discarded this portion of the constitution by fiat of the court. It will further erode the peoples' confidence in and submission to our current power structure.


Comments

    Sooner Politics
      Editorial  

    Picture
    David Van Risseghem reports the events and adds some perspective. 


    Search Our Archives.

    Get A Daily News Email

    * indicates required

    Get new posts by email:


    Archives

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    August 2015
    January 2015


    Subscribe in a reader
    ​We recently moved our blog. Our archives are still partially stored at our old site. 

    Author

    David Van Risseghem  is the Publisher of SoonerPolitics.org. The resource is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform.  This endeavor seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement...

    ​"No politician 'checks off every box" in your list of issues. You have to prioritize and use personal discretion regarding every current and future issue that you can imagine. Then you have to also judge integrity & consistency. A candidate's openness to study the issues & courage to think for themselves. Then you need to review their honesty & work ethic.  I respect any voter's decision, when they've informed themselves and took voting seriously." - David Van Risseghem
​FRONT PAGE •  OKLAHOMA NEWS • EDITORIAL • SOONER ISSUES •​ STATE GROUPS •​ SOONER ANALYSTS •​ LAWMAKER'S JOURNAL •​ NATION •​ NATIONAL COMMENTARY •​ CARTOONS •​ ​
Picture

918 . 928 . 7776

 SoonerPolitics.org is committed to informing & mobilizing conservative Oklahomans for civic reform & restored liberty. We seeks to utilize the efforts of all cooperative facets of the Conservative movement... Content of the diverse columns are solely at the discretion of the dozens of websites who create the content.   David Van Risseghem  is the founder of this platform.
 Sooner Politics News is a platform, not a media site. All our bloggers get their feeds promoted regardless of content. As soon as We suppress or delete even one posting, we become an endorser of whatever We didn't censor..The publisher doesn't (and could not) logically agree with all the content, so we would not expect any rational reader to agree, either. What we do hope, is that readers will think for themselves, and at least be better informed of the issues, events, and values that our citizen journalists work hard to provide for free.. We automate much of the tasks so that our sources' content gets as much exposure as possible. We encourage constructive discussion & debate. The solution is more free speech, not less.​

  • Front Page
  • Oklahoma News
    • Oklahoma Reports
    • OCPAC
    • Oklahoma Constitution News
    • Citizen of the Year
    • Oklahoma History
    • Today, In History
    • Oklahoma Center Square
    • Faked Out Sports
    • AP Wire
    • NewsBreak Oklahoma
    • Inside the Capitol
    • Lawton Rocks
    • Muskogee Now
    • OSU Sports
  • Podcasts
  • SPTV
    • Fresh Black Coffee, with Eddie Huff
    • AircraftSparky
    • Red River TV
    • Oklahoma TV
    • E PLURIBUS OTAP
    • Tapp's Common Sense
  • Editorial
    • From the Editor
    • Weekend Report
    • 3D Politics
    • Reagan Speaks
  • Sooner Issues
    • Corruption Chronicle
    • Constitutional Grounds
    • State Groups
  • Sooner Analysts
    • OCPA
    • Muskogee Politico
    • Rooke Report
    • SoonerPoll
    • Everett Piper
    • Andrew Spiropoulos
    • Tulsa Devil's Advocate
    • Eddie Huff & Friends
    • 1889 Institute
    • Steve Byas
    • Michael Bates
    • Steve Fair
    • Josh Lewis
    • Tulsa Today
    • OK2A
    • Dr. Jim Meehan
    • AFP Oklahoma
    • Sooner Tea Party
  • Nation
    • Bongino Report
    • Breitbart News
    • Daily wire
    • Steven Crowder
    • InfoWars News
    • Jeff Davis
    • Alex Lains
    • The F1rst
    • Nigel Farage
    • NewsMax
    • America's Voice
    • Ron Paul Institute
    • Bill Gertz
    • Emerald
    • Just the News
    • Trey Gowdy
    • Fox Politics
    • National Commentary
  • Wit & Whimsy
    • Libs of Tiktok
    • It's Still The Law
    • Terrence Williams
    • Witty Cartoons
    • Will Rogers Said
    • Steeple Chasers
    • The Partisan
    • Satire
  • SoonerPolitics.org